Post by Master Kim on Oct 10, 2014 13:19:54 GMT -5
KOSA makes no medical claims, and its purpose is purely informative. KOSA also does not intend to promote any particular cure, nor do they suggest that patients should eventually abandon their ongoing therapies in favor of any others.
Did Cancer Evolve to Protect Us? - www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-cancer-evolve-to-protect-us/?WT.mc_id=SA_HLTH_20141007 Could cancer be our cells’ way of running in “safe mode,” like a damaged computer operating system trying to preserve itself, when faced with an external threat? That’s the conclusion reached by cosmologist Paul Davies at Arizona State University in Tempe (A.S.U.) and his colleagues, who have devised a controversial new theory for cancer’s origins, based on its evolutionary roots. If correct, their model suggests that a number of alternative therapies, including treatment with oxygen and infection with viral or bacterial agents, could be particularly effective...........
Last Edit: Jul 10, 2015 10:15:40 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Breast cancer is mainly due to unhealthy stomach and can easily and successfully treated with proper treatment on stomach. Eating a lot will give a lot of burden on stomach and liver, which is in charge of self-healing. Western medicine always tries to prove that the oriental medicine is right and they still do not know what exactly they are doing.
Last Edit: Nov 5, 2014 20:14:57 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Post by Master Kim on Oct 10, 2014 16:14:57 GMT -5
The present work illustrates unique design, construction and operation of an i-motif-based DNA nanomachine templated on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), which utilizes pH-responsive dynamic motion of i-motif DNA strands and aggregational behavior of AuNPs to elicit programmed delivery of therapeutic siRNA. The pH-sensitive nucleic acids immobilized on the AuNPs consisted of three functional segments, i.e., an i-motif DNA, an overhanging linker DNA and a therapeutic siRNA. At neutral pH, the i-motif DNA is hybridized with the overhanging linker DNA segment of the therapeutic siRNA. However, in endosomal acidic pH, the i-motif DNA forms interstrand tetraplex, which could induce cluster formation of AuNPs resulting in endosomal escape of AuNP clusters, and produce a high gene silencing efficiency by releasing siRNA in the cytosol. Furthermore, the cluster formation of AuNPs accelerated photothermal ablation of cells when irradiated with laser. Precise and synchronized biomechanical motion in subcellular microenvironment is realized through judicious integration of pH-responsive behavior of the i-motif DNA and AuNPs, and meticulous designing of DNA. i-Motif-Driven Au Nanomachines in Programmed siRNA Delivery for Gene-Silencing and Photothermal Ablation - pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn5022567
This technology seems to be of a great help to cancer patients. However, this still seems to have limitations like following, at least. 1. It is not possible for it to be delivered to bone of bone cancer patients. 2. This cannot prevent cancer cells from being created. 3. What happens to the dead cancer cells?
이 기술에도 적어도 아래와 같은 문제점이 있다. 1. 골수암 환자의 뼈에 도달시킬 수 없다. 2. 새 암 세포가 생기는 것을 막을 수 없다. 3. 사망한 암 세포는 어떻게 될 것인지에 대한 답이 없다.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
What many people in nutrition industry does not think of: 1. Not all people have good metabolism and/or digestion system to absorb nutritions they recommend. 2. KOSA has successfully treated many different kinds of challenging diseases without changing diet or nutriiton.
Last Edit: Nov 7, 2014 14:19:16 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
GM and herbicide cancer warning suppressed in retracted study Glyphosate promotes growth of human breast cancer cells at minute concentrations Glyphosate in humans and animals within the range with carcinogenic potential Carcinogenic potential of glyphosate known since the 1980s Epidemiological evidence that pesticides are associated with cancer risks Why glyphosate should be banned.....
The evidence is growing that using cellphones increases the risk of developing glioma, a deadly form of brain cancer. A Swedish study found that people who talked on cellphones for more than 25 years had triple the risk compared to those who used the phones for less than a year.
The study, which was published in the journal Pathophysiology, found that people who used the phones the most — a total of 1,486 hours — doubled their risk of being diagnosed with glioma. A previous Swedish study found that people who used cellphones regularly before the age of 20 quadrupled their risk of the rare tumor. An article, also published in Pathophysiology stated that brain cancer is only the "tip of the iceberg" because the rest of the body shows effects other than cancers.
The actual numbers of gliomas caused by cellphones may be much higher, says neurosurgeon and health expert Dr. Russell Blaylock. "Because of problems with reporting, many gliomas are never reported," he tells Newsmax Health. "It may take over ten years of heavy use to see a dramatic rise, and with younger ages now using cellphones for long periods and sleeping on them, we will definitely see a tremendous rise in brain tumors in the next ten years."
Many studies that show cellphones are safe have been financed by the cellphone industry, he says. "Most studies were designed by the companies and conducted for too short a time to see statistical changes.....
..... Dr. Kondo's latest book, "Side Effects of Anti-Cancer Drugs," has hit several best-seller lists since it arrived in bookstores late last year. Patients flock to his practice, and he has become about as much of a celebrity as a full-time radiologist can.
Surveys suggest that only about a quarter of Japanese doctors always tell patients when they have cancer. People are especially unlikely to be told if they have inoperable cancers with a poor prognosis; patients with stomach cancer may be told they have nothing more than an ulcer.
A 50-year-old woman named Kazuko Makino was told that she had gallstones, even though her doctor suspected gallbladder cancer. The doctor recommended surgery, but Mrs. Makino was a nurse and decided that she did not need an operation to remove her "gallstones."
The cancer spread, and Mrs. Makino died. Her family sued the hospital for malpractice, but a court rejected the claim, ruling in a landmark case in 1989 that doctors need not tell cancer patients their true condition.
Japanese doctors do not disclose bad news primarily because of fear that it would upset the patient and harm the prognosis. Neither side can cite statistics about whether patients live longer if they have been lied to, but even some of those who favor honesty worry about the psychological and physiological consequences if a doctor is seen as pronouncing a death sentence.
Dr. Kondo acknowledges that he used to go along with this.
"I didn't tell patients the truth," he said. "I lied to them. But it was a very bad experience."
Dr. Kondo was also greatly affected by a year he spent in the United States, in 1979. "I realized that if a doctor could tell the truth to patients in the U.S.," he said, "then I could do the same to patients in Japan."
The best gauge of what Dr. Kondo is up against is the popularity of an anti-cancer drug called Krestin. Its manufacturer says Krestin sales amount to about $100 million a year.
It is said to be popular because doctors can prescribe it without telling patients that they have cancer. Krestin is taken orally, and does not have debilitating side effects that might give patients clues to the diagnosis.
But critics assert that Krestin does not have much in the way of good effects either. The Japanese Hospital Association has condemned the drug, saying doctors wasted $10 billion on it and another anti-cancer drug.....
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
They say there’s only two things constant in this life: death and taxes. But a third viable contender might be cancer, which an extensive cohort of scientific research has found is caused by prolonged exposure to radiation from cell phones and their associated communication towers.
Contrary to what you may have heard in the mainstream news, mobile phones and the antennas that allow them to communicate emit powerful, microwave radio frequencies capable of penetrating our bodies and cells. And constant exposure to these frequencies, according to the science, appears to be one of the leading causes of cancer in the modern age.
Wireless Phone Radiation Can Lead to Brain Cancer
Extensive research into the connection between cell phone radiation and cancer has linked this ubiquitous modern technology to two main types of brain tumors: gliomas and acoustic neuromas. Information compiled by the ElectricSense.com has confirmed the following findings with regard to cell phones and brain cancer.
1) An independent study commissioned by U.S. wireless carrier T-Mobile found that cell phone radiation directly initiates and promotes the formation of cancer:
3) A review of 23 epidemiological studies conducted by seven scientists concluded that cell phones cause a “harmful association” between cell phones and cancer. The only included studies that didn’t suggest this were “lower quality” ones that researchers say “failed to meet scientific best practices” — these studies were all funded by the mobile phone industry:
4) Researchers from the Hardell Research Group, which is noted for conducting what many consider to be the highest-quality studies on the subject, found a “consistent pattern” of increased risks for both glioma and acoustic neuroma in conjunction with mobile phone use:
5) A study out of France observed similar outcomes associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic frequencies from mobile phones. Scientists noted higher rates of gliomas and temporal tumors from “occupational and urban mobile phone use.” In response, the EMF watchdog group Powerwatch noted that this study supports the categorization of mobile phone radiation as a “probable human carcinogen.”
6) A study of nearly 800,000 middle-aged UK women found that those who used cell phones for 10 years or more had a 250 percent increased risk of developing an acoustic neuroma. The longer the women used the phones, the higher their risk:
7) Similarly, a study conducted by the group Lonn found that acoustic neuromas are increasingly more likely to develop the longer a person uses a mobile phone:
8) In Sweden, researchers studying adult brain tumor cases found that individuals with the highest cumulative use of mobile phones also had the highest risk of developing brain cancer:
9) The Hardell group conducted a study in 2009 which found that RF-EMFs from mobile and cordless phones are directly associated with malignant brain tumors. This study specifically states that wireless radiation initiates and promotes carcinogenesis:
Wireless Phone Radiation Also Triggers Pituitary, Thyroid, Stem Cell, Oral, Parotid, Lymph Node, Breast, Blood, Prostate and Eye Cancers
1) The body’s “master” gland, also known as the pituitary gland, is responsible for producing hormones and regulating other key bodily systems. But a study out of France found that cell phone use greatly increases the risk that this important gland will become cancerous:
2) The thyroid gland, which similarly produces hormones in addition to regulating body temperature, is also affected by mobile phone radiation. An Israeli study found that rates of cell phone use are directly proportional to the risk of developing thyroid gland cancer:
3) Many health experts would contend that solar radiation poses the greatest threat to healthy skin. But a study out of Sweden found that melanoma risk is greatly accelerated by mobile phone use:
4) A controversial Powerwatch study found that cell phone use nearly triples the risk of neuroepithelial tumors, which are a result of stem cell cancer:
5) Another study out of Israel confirmed a direct association between cell phone use and cancers of the mouth. Based on 460 cases of parotid gland tumors, researchers observed a direct association between mobile phone radiation and cancers of the parotid, the salivary gland located right next to where users typically hold their phones:
6) A separate study, also out of Israel, found that parotid gland cancers have increased in prevalence by 400 percent in the country between 1970 and 2006, which scientists link to increased mobile phone use:
7) An extensive review of more than 12 separate studies looking at health outcomes from exposure to radiation from mobile phone, television and radio broadcast towers found that cancers in general, and specifically cancers of the brain and blood (leukemia), are greatly increased:
8) Lymph nodes, a key component of the immune system, don’t like cell phone radiation much, either. An Australian study found that typical exposure to cell phone radiation greatly increases lymphoma risk:
9) Back in the U.S., a study looking at young women with breast cancer found that regular use of smartphones can trigger the formation of breast cancer. This is especially true when women carry their phones in their blouses or bras, where phones are pressed directly against the breasts.
10) Researchers in Germany have also linked mobile phone radiation to uveal melanoma and other cancers of the eye:
11) Practically every other type of cancer not covered by one of the aforementioned studies was identified in a large-scale Brazilian study, which linked mobile phone radiation to cancers of the prostate, breasts, lungs, kidneys and liver. Shockingly, more than 80 percent of identified deaths in Brazil’s third largest city, Belo Horizonte, occurred less than 500 meters away from one of the city’s 300 cell phone antennas:
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Post by Master Kim on Mar 23, 2015 19:15:39 GMT -5
Although KOSA does not agree with all of these videos, these might be of help, because the western medicine has failed to find the cure and most importantly, the science of the western medicine needs to be challenged.
If the western medicine is the ultimate science, there must have been the cure on all sorts of cancer. Because the western medicine has not discovered the cure yet, not all of what the western medicine knows may be accurate and, thus, it needs to be challenged.
The New York Times By ANGELINA JOLIE PITTMARCH 24, 2015
LOS ANGELES — TWO years ago I wrote about my choice to have a preventive double mastectomy. A simple blood test had revealed that I carried a mutation in the BRCA1 gene. It gave me an estimated 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer. I lost my mother, grandmother and aunt to cancer.
I wanted other women at risk to know about the options. I promised to follow up with any information that could be useful, including about my next preventive surgery, the removal of my ovaries and fallopian tubes.
I had been planning this for some time. It is a less complex surgery than the mastectomy, but its effects are more severe. It puts a woman into forced menopause. So I was readying myself physically and emotionally, discussing options with doctors, researching alternative medicine, and mapping my hormones for estrogen or progesterone replacement. But I felt I still had months to make the date.
Then two weeks ago I got a call from my doctor with blood-test results. “Your CA-125 is normal,” he said. I breathed a sigh of relief. That test measures the amount of the protein CA-125 in the blood, and is used to monitor ovarian cancer. I have it every year because of my family history.
But that wasn’t all. He went on. “There are a number of inflammatory markers that are elevated, and taken together they could be a sign of early cancer.” I took a pause. “CA-125 has a 50 to 75 percent chance of missing ovarian cancer at early stages,” he said. He wanted me to see the surgeon immediately to check my ovaries.
I went through what I imagine thousands of other women have felt. I told myself to stay calm, to be strong, and that I had no reason to think I wouldn’t live to see my children grow up and to meet my grandchildren.
I called my husband in France, who was on a plane within hours. The beautiful thing about such moments in life is that there is so much clarity. You know what you live for and what matters. It is polarizing, and it is peaceful.
That same day I went to see the surgeon, who had treated my mother. I last saw her the day my mother passed away, and she teared up when she saw me: “You look just like her.” I broke down. But we smiled at each other and agreed we were there to deal with any problem, so “let’s get on with it.”
Nothing in the examination or ultrasound was concerning. I was relieved that if it was cancer, it was most likely in the early stages. If it was somewhere else in my body, I would know in five days. I passed those five days in a haze, attending my children’s soccer game, and working to stay calm and focused.
The day of the results came. The PET/CT scan looked clear, and the tumor test was negative. I was full of happiness, although the radioactive tracer meant I couldn’t hug my children. There was still a chance of early stage cancer, but that was minor compared with a full-blown tumor. To my relief, I still had the option of removing my ovaries and fallopian tubes and I chose to do it. Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story
I did not do this solely because I carry the BRCA1 gene mutation, and I want other women to hear this. A positive BRCA test does not mean a leap to surgery. I have spoken to many doctors, surgeons and naturopaths. There are other options. Some women take birth control pills or rely on alternative medicines combined with frequent checks. There is more than one way to deal with any health issue. The most important thing is to learn about the options and choose what is right for you personally.
In my case, the Eastern and Western doctors I met agreed that surgery to remove my tubes and ovaries was the best option, because on top of the BRCA gene, three women in my family have died from cancer.
I have a little clear patch that contains bio-identical estrogen. A progesterone IUD was inserted in my uterus. It will help me maintain a hormonal balance, but more important it will help prevent uterine cancer. I chose to keep my uterus because cancer in that location is not part of my family history.
It is not possible to remove all risk, and the fact is I remain prone to cancer. I will look for natural ways to strengthen my immune system. I feel feminine, and grounded in the choices I am making for myself and my family. I know my children will never have to say, “Mom died of ovarian cancer.”
Regardless of the hormone replacements I’m taking, I am now in menopause. I will not be able to have any more children, and I expect some physical changes. But I feel at ease with whatever will come, not because I am strong but because this is a part of life. It is nothing to be feared.
I feel deeply for women for whom this moment comes very early in life, before they have had their children. Their situation is far harder than mine. I inquired and found out that there are options for women to remove their fallopian tubes but keep their ovaries, and so retain the ability to bear children and not go into menopause. I hope they can be aware of that.
It is not easy to make these decisions. But it is possible to take control and tackle head-on any health issue. You can seek advice, learn about the options and make choices that are right for you. Knowledge is power.
What is KOSA? - saahm.proboards.com/search/results?what_all=angelina+jolie&who_only_made_by=0&display_as=0 The western medicine found that Angelina Jolie had an 87% risk of developing breast cancer due to a defective BRCA1 gene. This may be regarded the western medicine is quite scientific. KOSA believes that the western medicine is unscientific and experimental because they did not know if she would have fell in 87% or 13% and they just did a preventive double mastectomy. Even worse yet though, the below fact proves Angelina Jolie lost breasts for nothing because no breast does not lower the chance of breast cancer. As a matter of a fact, because of the double mastectomy, her organs (especially stomach) had to suffer the agonizing period of time to heal the surgery and the chance of breast cancer might even have been increased. Please refer to this article, A lady died from the 2nd breast cancer. If the western medicine would have been scientific, they would have prevented her breast cancer from occurring.
What if the percentage of ovarian cancer was a 49%? Would doctors still recommend her to take the surgery? If it was 49%, they would have still done so. What if it was 45%? I guess... 5 would be rounded up and it would be regarded as 50%, which would be regarded 100%. What if it was 44%?... The number of 50% of Angelina's chance is based on observation. Age, diet, work, exercise, whether, environment, and etc. must have been taken account of. Please watch below video, which will explain the problem of observation. "Truth That Lasts" - NNT - Must Watch Video - TED - saahm.proboards.com/thread/473/truth-lasts-nnt-watch-video
Analyzing DNA and find out the chance of certain type of cancer seen to be very scientific. And, many people hear the trumpet of the triumph accomplished by the western medicine. Unless they find the root cause, the cure, how to successfully prevent and etc. are discovered, it is still too early to play the trumpet. As I pointed out earlier, unless they know for sure that Angelina would fall in 50% of no cancer or 50% of cancer, it is not science but simply gambling.
Let's assume that you are a doctor has Angelina as one of your patients. Can you tell her that she doesn't have to worry because you are sure she is luckily in optimistic 50%? Can you tell her when it is 34% that she is safe? I guess not to all above, because you would have to be responsible for all the consequences when it goes wrong. Thus, you would still have to recommend her to get surgery even though it is mere 4% because you would have to be afraid of the incident that she has cancer developed.
This is not science. This is not medicine. This is a typical example of western medicine's scare tactic. This is business.
I truly feel sorry for poor Angelina. Her choice would cause lots of trouble on her lung, large intestine, stomach, spleen, kidney and liver, at least.
Last Edit: Dec 24, 2020 19:34:43 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
There are over 200 different types of cancers and even more factors and reasons for them developing within the human body. There is also an increase in the occurrence of cancer in our society as well as the amount of lives claimed by the disease on a daily basis worldwide. Now, when we consider the fact that just about 10% of cancer cases are linked to being hereditary and the other 90% to lifestyle and other environmental factors, questions must be asked. Questions such as, “are our smartphones killing us smartly?” Now I’m sure you may be wondering what I’m up to, after all I am talking about cancer on a technology blog. Well, in as much as the link between certain cancers and the use of technology (like cellphones, smartphones etc.) is inconclusive, it does not change the fact that there may (or may not) be a direct relationship between the two and if there is and we’re just not aware of it as yet, then there are certain best practices that we should consider from now before it’s too late.
True story: A very close friend of mine started complaining about these headaches she was having, she said she would go to bed feeling fine and wake up the next morning with headaches. This went on for some time before she told me about it. Now, I’m not a doctor, but you do not need to be a doctor to ask “common sense” questions. So I asked her what had changed between her waking without headaches and the onset of the problem. Long story short, she had gotten a BlackBerry smartphone and had started sleeping with it under her pillow so she would hear its alarm on mornings. I simply asked her to try sleeping without the device close to her bed and see if the headaches would go away – she did and the headaches went away. Were the headaches caused by the device? Well, what do you think? What I do know is that BlackBerry smartphones are among the devices with the highest SAR rating in the world – meaning they give off a lot of radiation. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the government-monitored radiation level standard for cellphones. In short it is a way of measuring the quantity of radio frequency energy that is absorbed by the human body where devices with lower numbers are healthier. See here for more on SAR. Please feel free to share your thoughts and views in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
The “Dr. Frankenstein” that created this genetically modified monster, Monsanto, is doing everything it can to keep you from finding out how dangerous it is.
But this news is so important it just can’t be kept quiet.
So when scientists in France were recently able to republish a shocking study they had done — one the industry tried to suppress — it was a big victory. A victory for the researchers and for us.
Because the truth is that Monsanto’s GM corn is slowly but surely killing us.
I smell a rat
Two years ago French scientists published an alarming study.
They discovered that rats eating Monsanto’s GM corn, the kind made to survive after being sprayed with its Roundup pesticide, suffered serious health effects. Things like severe organ damage and deadly tumors.
And guess where they got the idea to do the study in the first place?
Right out of Monsanto’s own research!
Monsanto’s very own studies had found signs of toxicity in rats when they ate GM corn. But those studies were stopped after just 90 days! Unbelievably that’s all the testing that Monsanto did.
The French team got hold of Monsanto’s data. They decided to repeat the studies, only now for two years. They wanted to see if those signs of toxicity developed into something more serious.
And they sure did — big time.
The rats died. And they died from giant cancerous tumors and damage to their livers and kidneys.
The French researchers said that “serious diseases like organ damage and tumors take time to develop and become obvious.” Just testing the rats for 90 days was “too short” a time.
But here’s where things started to smell like a rat — a great big genetically modified Monsanto rat.
Last year, the journal where this study was published formally retracted it. This is unheard of in a scientific publication unless plagiarism or fraud is involved.
But those French researchers just finally got that study republished in an open-source online journal.
Now everyone will be able to learn just how dangerous this corn is.
You see, you get a tiny dose of Roundup every time you eat GM corn.
And corn is in a whole lot of food products.
It’s used as a filler in processed food, in oils and even in soda — think high fructose corn syrup. Once you start looking at ingredients you’ll be shocked at how much corn you’re actually eating and drinking.
Now, you’re only getting a tiny bit of Roundup residue, but a little bit goes a long way.
That’s because Roundup can disrupt your hormones. And as Laura Vandenberg, a professor of environmental health sciences at the University of Maryland explains, it only takes the slightest change in our hormones to cause permanent damage.
“Hormones act in the parts-per-billion” or trillion level, she said. “That’s like a drop of water in an Olympic-sized swimming pool.”
The Roundup gets inside, and stays inside, of GM crops because it’s a “systemic” pesticide. And that’s exactly how it’s meant to work.
The good news is that organic corn is still real — and not sprayed with Roundup. And lately, more and more companies, even big ones like General Mills, Kellogg’s and even Walmart have been hopping on the organic bandwagon with more and more products.
And an easy way to avoid not just corn, but other GM foods as well, is with the non-GMO shopping guide put out by The Institute for Responsible Technology.
Buying GMO-free foods is a way to tell Monsanto that you’re not a lab rat. And you won’t be part of its big experiment to see how many trillions it can make before everyone realizes what a big mistake it was to let its mad scientists take control of our food supply.
You can download the shopping guide here.
Sources: “Roundup herbicide linked to tumors, organ damage” Leah Zerbe, June 23, 2014, Rodale News, rodalenews.com “French scientists revive assault on pesticide, GM corn” Richard Ingham and Celine Serrat, June 24, 2014, Yahoo news, news.yahoo.com “New study: GMO sweet corn rare in U.S. supermarkets” Press release, Friends of the Earth, November 14, 2013, enewspf.com
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Men who take body-building supplements such as creatine or androstenedione have up to a 177 percent higher chance of developing testicular cancer than men who don’t, new research suggests. And the risk is worse if you started using young.
It’s very preliminary work, but the results could help to explain why testicular cancer has become far more common (more than 1.5 times more common, to be precise) than it was in the ‘70s, along with society's growing consumption of supplements.
"The observed relationship was strong," said epidemiologist and study-leader Tongzhang Zheng, from Brown University in the US, in a press release. "If you used at earlier age, you had a higher risk. If you used them longer, you had a higher risk. If you used multiple types, you had a higher risk."
This is the first study to link testicular cancer to body-building supplements, but it was inspired by earlier research that suggested body-building supplements, namely androstenedione, could damage the testes.
To work out what was going on, the team conducted detailed lifestyle interviews with nearly 900 men in the US - 356 of them had been diagnosed with testicular cancer, while 513 had not. They asked about how often they were using supplements, but also about other potential risk factors, such as smoking, drinking, exercise habits, previous injuries to the region, and family history.
After taking into account all these factors, the team found that men who took muscle-building supplements had on average a 65 percent greater risk of developing testicular cancer compared to those who didn’t. And this risk increased to 177 percent if the men used more than one type of supplement. It also shot up significantly if the men had started using supplements before the age of 25, or for more than three years.
The results have been published in the British Journal of Cancer, and offer epidemiologists an important insight into what causes the poorly understood cancer, and why it's on the rise. "Testicular cancer is a very mysterious cancer," said Zheng. "None of the factors we’ve suspected can explain the increase."
Of course, correlation doesn’t equal causation, and more work needs to be done to find out exactly what’s happening here. But the researchers think they now have a solid lead to follow, and the best part is that, if this link is confirmed, it'll be simple and quick for men to significantly reduce their testicular cancer risk.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Let us start with three facts about cancer you have probably never heard before:
1. Cancer cells can be reverted into normal cells (more than 20 treatments which do this are described on this website), 2. Depending on the treatment that is chosen, 5-year survival rates (i.e. “cure rates”) for the same kind of cancer can range from 3% to 90% (almost all patients use the 3% cure rate treatments because they don’t know about the 90% cure rate treatments), 3. Inexpensive, safe and gentle cancer treatments (with 90% cure rates) have existed for decades, but very, very few people know these treatments even exist, If you read this entire home page you will know a lot about the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates and you will know why you don’t know about them!! And you will learn about some of the people who support the patients who use the 90% cure rate treatments.
Terminology Clarification: When we use a term like “3% cure rate” we are talking about the percent of cancer patients who live for 5 years after diagnosis. The reference to 5 years is the standard of comparison. However, medical doctors frequently use a “six-month” cure rate statistic in order to make their treatments look far more effective than they really are. But we always use a 5-year cure rate statistic. How is it possible to have a 90% cure rate? You use cancer treatments that do not damage healthy cells because they target cancer cells and either gently kill the cancer cells or revert them into normal cells. Thus they can be used in very high doses plus in many cases several of these types of treatments can be combined together for synergy!!
However, the general public does not know about the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates because the media doesn’t talk about them. The media is like an iceberg, they tell you the 10% of the truth that is highly profitable to them, but they blacklist the 90% of the truth that is not profitable enough for them.
And when you trust your television What you get is what you got Cause when they own the information Oh, they can bend it all they want John Mayer: “Waiting on the World to Change” The reason the media blacklists the truth about the 90% cure rate treatments is that the media is owned by multi-billionaires and the treatments that have 90% cure rates are not profitable enough to satisfy their lust for profits. People who trust the media, and who trust the multi-billionaires who own the pharmaceutical industry, have a 3% chance of surviving their cancer for 5 years!!
If you don’t believe me, study the data in the Australian and American traditional medicine “5-year survival” charts and see what the 5-year cure rate is for your type of cancer: Clinical Oncology (2004, p.549-560): Oncology Cure Rates
If you studied the charts, the 5-year cure rate in America is 2.1%. In other words, in five years after diagnosis, 97.9% of the cancer patients treated with traditional cancer treatments, meaning those who trust the media and pharmaceutical industry, are dead.
So what are the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates that the media is hiding? I will give you one quick example.
The late Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist turned cancer researcher, treated over 33,000 cancer patients. Among those who went to him first, his 5-year cure rate was 90%.
Why hasn’t the media glorified Dr. Kelley? The reason is that Dr. Kelley used products that cannot be patented.
It is patents that create massive profits for the media and the pharmaceutical industry and the medical industry!! Because Dr. Kelley did not use patented drugs, the media doesn’t talk about him and no one in the medical industry is using his safe, gentle and highly effective protocol (with one exception in New York – the clinic of Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez).
So what did Dr. Kelley use? He used treatments designed by God. God does not have a PhD, but God designed the DNA for every species of plant and animal on this planet, including human DNA. By comparison, many scientists, who have lots and lots of PhDs, have studied DNA since 1953 and they still don’t have a clue what 97% of human DNA is used for. Asking a scientist to design human DNA from scratch would be like asking a mouse to design a jet engine or like asking a horse to pass an advanced calculus exam.
God put His cancer treatments into Mother Nature for free for His children. In other words, Dr. Kelley used natural products from Mother Nature. They are frequently called “natural cancer treatments” or “alternative cancer treatments” because they don’t involve highly profitable patented drugs. This is where the 90% cure rate cancer treatments come from.
In other words, Dr. Kelley did not have to know how to cure cancer, God (i.e. Mother Nature) had to know how to cure cancer!!! People sometimes want to know the credentials of natural medicine cancer researchers. Our credentials are that we know how Mother Nature can cure cancer. But we know a lot more than that. For example, we know many ways to revert cancer cells into normal cells.
The problem is that orthodox medicine refuses to use treatments that cannot be patented!! That, in a nutshell, is the difference between orthodox medicine and natural medicine!! Orthodox medicine uses highly profitable treatments and we use safe, gentle and highly effective treatments.
In addition to the media refusing to talk about the 90% cure rate treatments, they have perfected the art of brainwashing:
“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.” Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Alan Bullock By using the constant repetition of seeing “medical doctors” on television, people are conditioned (the “uniform pattern of public utterance“) to believe that anyone who is not a “medical doctor,” including God, must be a quack (the “jarring dissonance“)!! The average American thinks that God is too stupid to cure cancer and that anyone who endorses natural medicine is a quack!!
Thus, when people get cancer, they run to their medical doctor, who has the 3% cure rate!! The media has done their job well and the massive profits of the pharmaceutical industry and medical cartel have been protected!! But as a side-effect of these tactics, cancer patients have a 3% chance of surviving their cancer instead of the 90% chance of surviving their cancer by using the treatments the media never talks about!!
A Key Question
It is important for me to answer this question: “Will everyone who uses natural cancer treatments have a 90% chance of surviving their cancer?”
The actual chance of survival will depend on several factors:
1) How many, what kind, and for how long, has the patient used orthodox cancer treatments, 2) How long has it been since their orthodox cancer treatments were completed, 3) What kind of cancer does the patient have?
In a nutshell, in what condition is the cancer patient when they begin their natural cancer treatment? The expected cure rate can range from 10% to 90% depending on their initial condition.
The 90% cure rate is based on newly diagnosed cancer patients who have not had any orthodox cancer treatments. Expected cure rates can drop to as low as 10% for cancer patients who have had significant orthodox cancer treatments and have lost a lot of time because they didn’t know about natural cancer treatments and they have a very nasty type of cancer, such as brain stem cancer. In short, the expected cure rate depends on the condition of the patient at the time they begin the treatment and the type of cancer they have.
Another key factor to survival is picking the best natural cancer treatment for their situation. That is what this website is all about.
But do not underestimate the power of natural cancer treatments!! There are natural treatments to deal with many of the issues faced by even very advanced cancer patients. For example, a device called the Photon Genius can quickly energize the cells of weak cancer patients, as just one example of the specialized products in the arsenal of natural medicine. Most of the cancer patients we deal with are very advanced cancer patients.
Unfortunately, money also comes into play. Natural cancer treatment are much, much less expensive than orthodox cancer treatments, but insurance companies (which have health insurance policies approved by state insurance departments) almost never pay a dime for natural cancer treatments. Furthermore, by the time orthodox medicine gets done with a patient they are usually dead broke from paying for the insurance co-pays.
The fact is that the Dirt Cheap Protocol (that is its real name) is the most commonly used protocol which is discussed on this website, not because it is the strongest protocol, but because it is the only treatment many cancer patients can afford. There is also an article which lists inexpensive cancer treatments called the Inexpensive Cancer Treatments article.
One reason for the Inexpensive Cancer Treatments article is that cancer patients in other countries may not be able to afford or even be allowed to import many of the products used in the powerful natural cancer treatments, thus they must purchase their cancer treatment products locally in their own country.
As mentioned, a key factor that affects the chance of survival is the type of cancer a patient has. Treating a newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma patient with liver cancer is vastly, vastly different than treating a patient with numerous brain tumors who has cachexia and has been treated and sent home to die by orthodox medicine.
What Really Causes Cancer?
Did you know that it is not necessary to kill cancer cells because cancer cells can be reverted into healthy cells? You probably think this is impossible because cancer is caused by DNA damage. Nope. DNA damage cannot occur until after the cell is already cancerous. Many of the treatments we have designed at the ICRF revert cancer cells into normal cells. To call us pioneers in this field would be an understatement!!
The 90% cure rate treatments, for example, can target cancer cells (to kill them or revert them into normal cells) and thus they can be given in very high doses because they do no harm to healthy cells even in high doses. Chemotherapy and radiation must be given in very low doses because they do not target cancer cells and thus they kill and damage many healthy cells. That is why orthodox medicine (which uses chemotherapy) only has a 3% overall cure rate.
All of the orthodox medicine non-profit organizations, such as the American Cancer Society (ACS) and Susan G. Komen For the Cure are in bed with the pharmaceutical industry and have no interest in natural cancer treatments. In fact, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. (the son of the founder of the pharmaceutical industry in America) founded the ACS in 1913!!
There was a cartoon which did a magnificent job of describing orthodox cancer research. The picture is of a dragon standing outside of his cave. A knight, standing in front of the dragon, is ready to do battle with the dragon.
The dragon offers a proposal to the knight: “Look … You’re dead if you lose and out of a job if you win, so what I propose is a win-win that can be summed up in 3 words … Dragon-Slaying Research.” The caption at the bottom of the cartoon says: “Birth of the Perpetual Fundraising Industry.” (Non Sequitur by Wiley, October 1, 2010)
The American Cancer Society (3% cure rates) receives more money in contributions, every ten minutes, than the Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF) (90% cure rates) receives in a year!! That gives you an idea of the power of the media to control the minds of the general public. Yet, after 100 years of “looking for a cure for cancer,” the ACS still doesn’t have a clue what really causes cancer, much less how to cure it.
To say that DNA damage causes cancer gives the American Cancer Society and many others an excuse to not cure cancer. However, their claim is scientific nonsense. While cancer cells do have DNA damage, that is not what causes cancer.
But even if DNA damage did cause cancer, why waste your time fixing the DNA damage when it is possible to gently target and kill cancer cells or to revert them into normal cells? Does the DNA damage protect a cancer cell from being killed? Of course not!!
Reverting cancer cells into normal cells was first done in the 1930s, which was two decades before the discovery of DNA!!
The technology to revert cancer cells into normal cells was developed by a microbiologist named Dr. Royal Rife. He was the first to specifically try to revert cancer cells into normal cells. Dr. Rife knew that microbes inside the cancer cells were causing the cells to be cancerous, but he did not know the mechanism of how the microbes caused the cancer.
(It was an ICRF cancer researcher, in 2004, who discovered the mechanism of how microbes inside the cancer cells partially block the production of ATP energy (adenosine triphosphate) inside of the cancer cells. A cell which has low ATP energy is the very definition of a “cancer cell” (a Nobel Prize was given for this discovery in 1931 to Otto Warburg) But even without knowing the mechanism Rife knew that if you killed these microbes the cancer cells would revert into normal cells.) These microbes had been identified in 1890 by the brilliant microbiologist William Russell. Many other researchers, since 1890, have seen these microbes inside the cancer cells.
But the technology of Dr. Rife, in the 1930s, was shut down by the FDA.
Congress, which created the FDA, is on the long list of organizations that have “sold out” to Big Pharma.
Rife’s device was designed to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and he had a 100% cure rate. That is precisely why he was shut down by the FDA (Note: before the FDA shut down Dr. Rife, the American Medical Association tried to “buy him out,” but he refused their offer because he knew they would destroy his equipment and his research, so the FDA destroyed his lab, equipment and inventory for the AMA and pharmaceutical industry.)
The good news is that eleven of his machines were sold before he was shut down. Because three of his original machines have been found, his technology has been replicated by the “High RF Frequency Devices,” which are “electromedicine devices,” which will be discussed later.
But for now realize that not only has Dr. Rife’s technology been replicated it has been greatly improved with modern automation technology and can be purchased for home use!! The new devices can run all night long while you sleep (e.g. Protocol D or a custom program), in addition to daytime programs!! It was an ICRF researcher who wrote the instructions for using this device for cancer.
My point is that the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates come from cancer researchers who do not endorse chemotherapy. They use a wide variety of technologies including electromedicine (e.g. the High RF Frequency devices, the Photon devices, the Bob Beck devices and several others); treatments that revert cancer cells into normal cells; treatments that safely kill cancer cells, directly or indirectly; treatments that supercharge the immune system, etc.
But the microbes inside the cancer cells are only part of the reason people have cancer. Microbes and parasites in the organs reduce the energy of the organs by stealing food and excreting mycotoxins and other waste products. When the energy of the organs is reduced the immune system becomes weak as well. When the immune system becomes weak the number of cancer cells can grow out of control.
In fact, everyone has cancer cells forming all the time. But normally their immune system kills the cancer cells fast enough that a person is never “diagnosed” with cancer. But when the immune system becomes weak, the cancer cells can grow out of control.
But there are even other microbes that contribute to cancer. The average person has two pounds of microbes in their bloodstream. As Dr. Bob Beck, who had a PhD in physics, discovered, these microbes also contribute to a weak immune system.
Many other things (e.g. an acidic diet of junk food) also contribute to a weak immune system or an abnormal increase in the number of cancer cells (e.g. via proliferation of the microbe that causes cancer).
About Specific Natural Cancer Treatments
Dr. Kelley cured cancer patients by using natural enzymes, called proteolytic enzymes, which strip the protein coating off of cancer cells (cancer cells have a different protein coating than healthy cells) in order for the immune system to identify the cancer cells and kill them. This protocol exists today and can be added to any of the other natural cancer treatments and it is a very good addition. On the left side-bar (which is the column of links on the left side of all web pages) it is called the “Kelley Metabolic” protocol. We generally do not recommend it as the main protocol, but it can be a supplemental protocol to any other cancer treatment.
Many natural medicine cancer researchers have not only used Dr. Kelley’s protocols, but have greatly improved on them!!
For example, the Cellect-Budwig protocol (see the left side-bar), which was designed by Mike Vrentas, a natural medicine cancer researcher, includes an alkaline product called Cellect, some key parts of the Kelley protocol and includes other natural cancer treatments, many times based on individual needs. If one can afford it the protocol can include one of the modern Rife devices.
The Cellect-Budwig protocol is just one of several highly potent cancer treatments.
Ponder this next question before reading on: Why did Mike Vrentas add other products, including Cellect, to the Kelley Protocol, which already had a 90% cure rate? Hint: it was not to increase the cure rate!!
While Mike occasionally deals with newly diagnosed cancer patients (it is actually rare when he works with a newly diagnosed cancer patient because of the media), most of the patients he works with have already had chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. His protocol deals with cancer patients who are in a wide range of different conditions, requiring an even more powerful regimen than what Dr. Kelley used.
If Mike, and others like him, only worked with newly diagnosed cancer patients, he likely would not have added anything to the Kelley protocol. But because of the media it is fairly rare when Mike or any of us get to work with a newly diagnosed cancer patient!!
Because of the media almost all cancer patients start their cancer treatment with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery and by the time they are “sent home to die” they figuratively have “one foot in the grave.” But it is usually several months after they are sent home to die that they accidentally learn about natural medicine, if they ever hear about it!! It is only then that they look into natural medicine.
For those sent home to die, the Kelley protocol, by itself, is simply not strong enough. That is why, in natural medicine, Mike and others generally use the Kelley protocol as a supplemental protocol to newer and far more powerful treatments which were designed for advanced cancer patients.
So while natural medicine cancer researchers frequently embrace the Kelley protocol, and add it to newer products and technologies, orthodox medicine has ignored and persecuted the Kelley protocol.
Why have the media’s “investigative journalists” not uncovered all of this and glorified Dr. Kelley and his amazing cancer treatments? Because they want to keep their jobs. The products that Dr. Kelley used are not as profitable to the media, by a wide margin, as current treatments. “Investigative journalists” work for the media companies, they only pretend to work for the general public.
In fact, the propaganda machine of the media has totally ignored Dr. Kelley, as has the medical establishment. As a result, the general public cannot believe someone could have a cure rate that high!!
At the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, or ICRF, we are proud to say that we are part of the continuing heritage of Dr. Kelley and other natural medicine researchers. More than a dozen key discoveries in natural medicine have been made by ICRF researchers. This is partly because modern natural medicine cancer researchers, who are not controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, have access to far better materials than what Dr. Kelley had access to. Cellect is just one example.
If you want a quick lesson in the power of natural medicine, spend several minutes studying the headers in the “ICRF Reference Manual.” This ICRF manual will blow your mind: ICRF Reference Manual
Some Of The Top Natural Medicine Cancer Treatments
The Cellect-Budwig protocol (which has already been mentioned) is frequently combined with an optional High RF Frequency Device – Plasma electromedicine device. This is a superb cancer treatment. The RF device uses a technology that actually reverts cancer cells into normal cells because it was patterned after Dr. Royal Rife’s equipment, but uses far newer technology!
Either the “High RF Frequency Device – Plasma” or its little brother, the High RF Frequency Device – 15 Watt can be used with the Cellect-Budwig, the Cesium Chloride Protocol, the Photon Protocol, the Dirt Cheap Protocol and others.
We always recommend the “Plasma” version over the “15 Watt” version because it is more powerful and it can be used while the patient sleeps, after the one-week “build-up” (the “build-up” is to prevent Herxheimer’s, which is harmless, but scary, “brain fog” created by killing too many microbes too quickly – the “build-up” is part of the free instructions that we provide).
The Cesium Chloride Protocol is a highly alkaline protocol which has an optional electromedicine device called the QRS (either High RF Frequency Device can also be used with this protocol). The QRS is primarily to deal with pain. The QRS can be rented so you know how effective it is before you buy it!! All rental payments go towards the purchase price.
The Cesium Chloride Protocol has been in continuous use for more than 35 years!! I have personally known Larry, of Essense-of-Life (spelling is correct), for over 10 years and he is clearly the modern-day expert in the home use of this protocol. Like the other protocols, there is a link to this protocol on the left side-bar.
The Photon Protocol, which uses one or both of the two Photon devices (the Photon Genius or Photon Genie), deals with the “root cause” of cancer.
The “root cause” of cancer is microbes and parasites that get inside of the organs, such as the liver and pancreas, as already mentioned. The Photon Protocol includes expert support to identify and kill these microbes.
The Photon Protocol deals both with the microbes in the organs (via a custom nutritional protocol), which restores the immune system (which can again deal with the cancer cells) and it helps restore the energy of the cells which were weakened by the microbes (via a Photon electromedicine device designed by the late Ed Skilling). The Photon devices also do a lot of other things.
The Bob Beck Protocol, which is not considered a major stand-alone protocol, is designed to get rid of microbes in the bloodstream. The late Bob Beck, who had a PhD in physics, designed a device that “attenuated” microbes in the bloodstream, meaning it made them unable to reproduce and thus they simply died out. This supercharged the immune system. However, this process is too slow for advanced cancer patients so his protocol is only used as a supplemental protocol.
By the way, the late Bob Beck learned about this technology from a medical journal article written by Dr. Kaali and Dr. Lyman, both medical doctors at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. When other medical doctors realized these two doctors had found a way to cure AIDS, they were furious and literally cut the article out of the journals before they were sent out!!
However, years later his article was quietly published in a different journal. It was an ICRF researcher who found the article in the other journal. This protocol is generally used for AIDS, but can be used for cancer. We will be happy to tell anyone where the article was published if they are interested in AIDS. We also support the AIDS community, but like cancer patients, the AIDS community is fed so many lies by orthodox medicine that very, very few of them use the highly effective Bob Beck devices or chlorine dioxide (i.e. the Jim Humble protocol), etc.
Another major protocol is the BX Antitoxins protocol which also reverts cancer cells into normal cells. Designed by an M.D. it comes with superb patient support. It is mainly used by those with cachexia.
In summary, cancer is a microbial disease, not a DNA disease. As will be seen in Part 2, the DNA damage in cancer cells is caused by the DNA of the microbes which are inside the cancer cells. This was discovered by the Virginia Livingston team of natural medicine researchers. More on this in Part 2.
The Cellect-Budwig, Cesium Chloride, Photon Protocol and BX Antitoxins are only four of many protocols which use technologies Dr. Kelley never knew about or even dreamed about. A few other top protocols are the Bob Wright Protocol, the Dirt Cheap Protocol, the Bill Henderson Protocol, etc.
Sometimes treatments can and should be combined. For example, the Skilling-Kehr protocol is a combination of the Photon Protocol (which kills microbes in the organs and thus allows the immune system to kill cancer cells plus the Photon device energizes cells), a High RF Frequency device (which reverts cancer cells into normal cells and also kills the microbes in the organs and bloodstream) and the Dirt Cheap Protocol (which includes treatments that primarily revert cancer cells into normal cells).
This is arguably the most potent cancer treatment on this website because there is so much redundancy in accomplishing the things that are needed to survive cancer. For example, both the Photon protocol and the High RF Frequency device kill microbes and parasites in the organs. However, it is a fairly expensive protocol. Its focus is on reverting cancer cells into normal cells and supercharging the immune system, but a few of the items do kill cancer cells.
People are sometimes shocked at the attitude of some cancer researchers who have little interest in killing cancer cells. But why kill cancer cells when it is so easy to revert them into normal cells or let the immune system kill them?
However, many of the natural medicine protocols do safely kill cancer cells or they include protocols that kill cancer cells and revert cancer cells into normal cells.
For example, the Cellect-Budwig is designed to safely kill cancer cells, build the immune system (so the immune system can kill the cancer cells) and energize weak cells. Also the High RF Frequency Device – Plasma, which reverts cancer cells into normal cells and kills microbes and parasites in the organs, is frequently used with the Cellect-Budwig protocol.
Do you understand that natural cancer treatments attack the cancer in several different ways and frequently use a lot of redundancy in doing each of these things!! Redundancy is important especially for advanced cancer patients.
We deal with many cancer patients who are literally dead broke or who live in countries where key products are not allowed to be imported. Because of this we also have the Dirt Cheap Protocol (aleady mentioned) and Inexpensive Cancer Treatments article (see the left side-bar). Many of the items in these articles can be purchased inside of any country.
What Is the Recommended Protocol For Your Situation?
Because there are several highly effective natural cancer treatments, which is best for your situation?
On the left side-bar are many links to specific types of cancer, such as Breast Cancer, Lymphoma, Stomach Cancer, etc. Each article recommends a specific natural medicine cancer treatment to deal with that type of cancer. In each case the protocol will include expert telephone support from a natural medicine expert.
The Ed Skilling Institute supports the Photon Protocol (which is recommended for melanoma, for example), Larry of Essense-of-Life (spelling is correct) supports the Cesium Chloride Protocol (which is recommended for bone cancers, for example), Mike Vrentas supports the Cellect-Budwig Protocol (which is recommended for pancreatic cancer, for example).
This is how you find the recommended protocol.
You do not have to use the recommended protocol, because any of the protocols will deal with any type of cancer, but these are the recommended protocols.
There are also articles linked to on the left side-bar for specific situations, such as a blocked colon. In this case the Cesium Chloride protocol or the Bob Wright Protocol must be the main treatment because their main treatment is liquid. The Cesium Chloride protocol only requires a small amount of liquids for those on a PEG tube.
As another example, the Photon Protocol does the best job at getting rid of microbes and parasites in the organs, which is critical when dealing with dangerous tumors and certain other situations.
More On the Politics of Cancer
Aren’t natural cancer treatments “unproven?” The American Medical Association (AMA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ad nauseum are totally controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They are “gifts” from corrupt politicians who receive “gifts” from Big Pharma’s bottomless money supply. The job of these government agencies is to persecute anyone who knows how to cure cancer, AIDS, etc.
Natural cancer treatments are rated “unproven” only because they are not profitable enough for the masters of the politicians. The word “unproven” should be translated into “unprofitable” because Mother Nature is unprofitable to Big Pharma.
For example, the FDA, in 2013, shut down one of the best cancer clinics in the world. The clinic was in Oklahoma. They shut it down because they were using natural medicine and were curing cancer. Curing cancer cuts into the profits of Big Pharma and must be stopped.
The FDA has also rigged their regulations to make it impossible for anyone except drug companies to create a “proven” cancer treatment.
The rig comes because the treatments of Mother Nature cannot be patented and the regulations are designed so that it is impossible to make enough money to afford to get FDA “approval” without massive amounts of money. The irony is that “proven” cancer treatments (according to the FDA) are no where near as effective against cancer as many of the “unproven” protocols!!!
The Independent Cancer Research Foundation has developed more than a dozen of the top natural cancer treatments on Earth, and all of them can be used at home. That is why you will never hear about us in a million years of watching television.
Funding An Expensive Protocol Without A Loan
Most cancer patients who use natural medicine have already had orthodox treatments and are dead broke. A few of the treatments on this page are expensive by natural medicine standards (e.g. Cellect-Budwig with High RF Frequency Generator with plasma amplifier, Cesium Chloride with QRS, BX Antitoxins and Photon Protocol with Photon Genius and/or Photon Genie).
There is a financial product which allows a cancer patient to quickly raise significant amounts of money for travel, clinic treatment, expensive protocols, etc. and it does not involve a loan!!
In short, it allows the cancer patient to benefit from their own life insurance policy both to spend more time with their family and to try to beat their cancer!!
In fact, the patient can use this money for anything they want, including trying to survive their cancer.
About The Dirt Cheap Protocol (VERY IMPORTANT FOR ALL PATIENTS)
As already mentioned, the Dirt Cheap Protocol was designed for cancer patients who lack funding and/or live in countries that will not allow the import of some of the key products.
But do not underestimate the Dirt Cheap Protocol, it is based on rock-solid cancer theory and includes a massive amount of redundancy in reverting cancer cells into normal cells!!
In fact, I strongly recommend that when a cancer patient finishes their main protocol (e.g. the Photon Protocol, Cellect-Budwig, etc.) that they wait three weeks and then start the Dirt Cheap Protocol and use it for several more months to “finish off” the cancer.
In fact, I cannot emphasize this strongly enough!!! I am going to repeat it again!!
When a cancer patient finishes their main protocol (e.g. the Photon Protocol, Cellect-Budwig, etc.) they should wait three weeks and then start the Dirt Cheap Protocol and use it for several more months to “finish off” the cancer.
The reason for the three week gap is to get some of the alkalinity out of the body because the Dirt Cheap Protocol includes its own highly alkaline protocol.
For example, the DMSO/CD protocol is one of the amazing treatments in the Dirt Cheap Protocol that has cured cancer by itself. However, DMSO and several other items in the Dirt Cheap Protocol cannot be used with blood-thinners, so pay attention to the warnings in the articles.
For many patients the Dirt Cheap Protocol will be the main protocol due to their very small budget.
Important Comments About Very Weak Cancer Patients
You would not believe the condition of many of the cancer patients who have been sent home to die and do not find out about natural cancer treatments until they are already very weak. The cure rate on these patients is certainly not 90% or even 60%, but do not underestimate the power of the newer natural cancer treatments!! You would be amazed at what we know!!
On the left side bar you will see a link titled: “Weak Cancer Patients” (the link is in red). This is an amazing and incredibly important article for weak cancer patients!!
The weak cancer patients article discusses many supplements which should be added to the main protocol (e.g. the Cellect-Budwig is a “main” protocol) specifically to deal with weak cancer cells and weak non-cancerous cells.
The article also talks about the Photon Genius and Photon Genie. Regardless of your main cancer treatment, a very weak cancer patient who cannot afford to purchase a Photon Genius should contact the Ed Skilling Institute to see if there is a Photon Genius near them which they can use!! It can be used with any protocol.
The Photon Genius is the “king” of energizing weak cells, and many of them are available to cancer patients (at someone’s house for a small fee or at a clinic). Or they can be purchased for $25,000. The Photon Genie is not as powerful but it can be used 24×7 (24 hours a day) and it does energize cells, pushes the lymph, etc. It only costs about $3,000. Here is how to find out if there is a Photon Genius near you: Ed Skilling Institute
If there is not a Photon Genius nearby, a Quantum Pulse is almost as good (it does not have infrared but it does energize cells). Here is how to see if there is a Quantum Pulse near you: Finding a Quantum Pulse
Also, a BioCharger (www.biocharger.com) costs about half of what a Quantum Pulse costs and it is also an excellent way to energize cells. I am not aware of any BioChargers which are available to the public.
For a very weak cancer patient; dealing with the weak cells may be the highest priority of focus for the first couple of weeks!!
The BX Antitoxins protocol was designed specifically for weak cancer patients, even those with cachexia, which is one reason it has such superb support.
For Those Using the Photon Protocol As Their Main Treatment
Most cancer treatments can be started within days, but the Photon Protocol requires a consultation with the Ed Skilling Institute to determine which supplements are needed to kill the specific microbes they want to kill.
For those who use the Photon Protocol as their main cancer treatment, it may take the Ed Skilling Institute (which sells and supports the Photon devices) several weeks to do the consultation, analyze the data, contact the patient and then for the patient to obtain the products they recommend for them.
Therefore, a patient who wants to use the Photon Protocol should start the Dirt Cheap Protocol today, along with items in the “Weak Patient’s” article (if they are weak). Some of these items can be purchased at a health food store. Several of the items in the Dirt Cheap Protocol can also be purchased at a health food store or grocery store.
When the supplements the Ed Skilling Institute recommends arrive at your house, you must stop the item in the Dirt Cheap Protocol called the Kelmun Protocol (because a cancer patient should only use one highly alkaline protocol at a time and both the Kelmun protocol [i.e. the baking soda and maple syrup combination] and the Skilling protocol are highly alkaline).
However, the patient may continue any of other Dirt Cheap Protocol items that they desire!! Only the Kelmun Protocol is alkaline enough to avoid when using the Photon Protocol. In other words, while LIPH and lemon juice are alkaline, they are not alkaline enough to worry about if taken with other alkaline protocols.
In fact, the Dirt Cheap Protocol (without the Kelmun baking soda and maple syrup) can be used with any of the major protocols. However, if the Dirt Cheap Protocol is combined with the Cellect-Budwig (without the Kelmun because Cellect is highly alkaline), the Budwig Diet portion should be taken first thing in the morning and four hours later any of the other protocols can be used for the rest of the day. Or the Budwig Diet can be taken four hours after the other protocols are finished for the day. This is because the Budwig Diet can be neutralized by antioxidants.
Two Common Questions
I frequently get emails from cancer patient who are concerned about the pH in their bloodstream. I tell them to read the “What Causes Cancer” article (see the left side bar).
The pH of the blood is irrelevant except that if the pH gets too high it can be dangerous. The pH of the blood has absolutely nothing to do with the cancer treatment.
It is the pH inside the cancer cells that is important!! This is what slows down the cancer microbe and thus slows down the spreading of the cancer!! Many of the natural medicine cancer protocols increase the pH inside the cancer cells. The pH inside the cancer cells, in some situations, can actually kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and revert the cancer cells into normal cells.
People also frequently ask me why maple syrup or molasses or honey are in the cancer treatments I design. I tell them to read the “What Causes Cancer” article. These items are “Trojan Horses” to get microbe-killing substances inside the cancer cells to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells so the cancer cells will revert into normal cells. In fact, the theory behind the Kelmun Protocol is superb!! The Dirt Cheap Protocol is loaded with these kinds of treatments.
Any time you see: DMSO (e.g. DMSO/CD), MSM (e.g. MSM/LIPH), honey (e.g. honey/curcumin), maple syrup (e.g. maple syrup and baking soda equals the Kelmun protocol) or molasses (e.g. molasses and baking soda) you are probably looking at a “Trojan Horse” to get a microbe-killing substance inside the cancer cells. In fact, honey is frequently used with the baking soda instead of maple syrup.
But DMSO is a very unique “Trojan Horse” and nothing else can replace it. It opens the ports of the cancer cells like nothing else. Every cancer patient on earth should use the DMSO/CD protocol (which is part of the Dirt Cheap Protocol) with their main protocol (unless they are on blood thinners), especially if there are tumors or high concentrations of cancer cells.
Even cancer patients using chemotherapy should use DMSO/CD. However, DMSO can create severe body odor so it is generally not used before leaving the house.
Dr. Philip Lowe, at Purdue University, discovered that folic acid also opens the ports of the cancer cells. However, the ICRF has not had the time or money to research this discovery.
Several Other Comments About Treatments
As another example of natural medicine, there are supplements that are designed to provide special nutrients for the immune system. The best example of this is “Transfer Point Beta Glucan“. You can search this website for “Transfer Point,” for example, by putting this into Google: site:cancertut.wpengine.com “Transfer Point”
There are also a number of products to deal with inflammation (use Google to find a vendor): DMSO/CD Inflamma-bLOX InflammaCORE Noni Juice (anthraquinones) DMSO (which is used in several cancer treatments) Chickweed Echinacea Basal Aloe Arborescens (the commercial product also includes honey) (see left side-bar)
Let us talk more about Aloe Arborescens because it has an interesting background.
Many treatments revert cancer cells into normal cells by killing the microbes inside the cancer cells. Aloe Arborescens is a typical cancer treatment that combines a “Trojan Horse” with something that kills microbes. The commercial formula, which has been used in many countries, includes honey and the Aloe Arborescens plant plus a small amount of whiskey (or other product) to open the capillaries to get the honey and Aloe Arborescens deeper into the tissue.
Honey is the “Trojan Horse” to target cancer cells and get the microbe-killing Aloe Arborescens plant inside the cancer cells to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and thus revert the cancer cells into normal cells.
The formula is state-of-the-art cancer theory at its best!! Cancer cells have 15 times more glucose receptors than normal cells, so the honey targets the cancer cells and gets the microbe-killing Aloe Arborescens inside the cancer cells to kill the microbes.
Aloe Arborescens is so powerful at killing microbes it is used as a treatment for AIDS!!
But the Aloe Arborescens formula was not discovered by a cancer researcher!! It was discovered using trial and error by a Catholic Priest in a very poor section of Brazil!! Orthodox medicine would not treat these cancer patients because they were too poor, so a wonderful Priest came up with the formula.
Chlorine Dioxide (CD) is also used to treat AIDS around the world. It is typically combined with DMSO as the Trojan Horse. The DMSO/CD protocol, like Aloe Arborescens, has cured cancer by itself. Both protocols are in the Dirt Cheap Protocol, but Aloe Arborescens can be added to any natural medicine cancer treatment. The rules for using DMSO/CD are complex, because chlorine dioxide is such a powerful oxidant, so it cannot be arbitrarily added to other protocols.
Don’t forget to STUDY the left side-bar for links to other articles which may apply to your situation!! And definitely read the “Common Questions” article. Most of the articles on this website are not even on the left side-bar so you may want to use Google for special situations. To do this add: site:cancertut.wpengine.com to the beginning of your search.
For example, if you want to search this website for articles that mention: “herbs,” put this into Google: site:cancertut.wpengine.com herbs
You should get more than 150 hits. In some cases the term may be used in a page header that you don’t see, so the real number of articles which talk about a subject may be less than Google shows.
How To Tell If Your Treatment Is Working
At the beginning of any natural cancer treatment you should take a blood test to find out how much cancer you have. Evaluate Progress
Then, every 3 months (give or take) take the same blood test again. If the score indicates you have more cancer, ADD some things to your treatment or switch to a stronger treatment!!
If the score indicates you have less cancer, keep doing what you are doing.
It is hard to get people to understand that the goal of the media is not to inform, but to control. By controlling the information they control their audience and that is how the media maximizes their profits.
The goal of the media is the same as that of all dictators – control the information and you control the minds of the people. This quote cannot be read often enough:
“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.” – Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives The media are masters of creating a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of the truth immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance
One way they do this is by glorifying medical doctors on television. It seems like medical doctors (real or pretend) are constantly showing up on the tube. Because of this, when someone is diagnosed with cancer, they run to their nearest medical doctor.
The uniform pattern of public utterance has been created by the media and no one, and I mean no one, will believe that cancer treatments with 90% cure rates already exist!!
When I tell people that cancer treatments with 90% cure rates already exist, you can bet they will respond with jarring dissonance.
And that is why cancer patients almost always start with orthodox cancer treatments and they usually end with orthodox cancer treatments. It is rare when a cancer patient seeks out natural medicine, because they don’t know about it and they won’t believe it when they hear it.
The battle against cancer is far more a battle of information than technology. The media totally controls the minds of the general public.
The technology to cure cancer is amazing, but this technology might as well be a military secret.
More About the FDA
As mentioned, the FDA is the “private police force” for the ultra-wealthy families that own the large pharmaceutical companies.
The FDA shut down a clinic in Georgia which was using the ultimate cancer treatment: DMSO and very low dose chemotherapy. This protocol alone would have a 100% cure rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients because the chemotherapy would target the cancer cells (because of the DMSO) and not damage the healthy cells. In fact, four types of chemotherapy have been identified that “bind” to DMSO (see my article on “DMSO Potentiation Therapy” or DPT).
After DMSO binds to chemotherapy, the DMSO will seek out the cancer cells like a guided-missile. Few non-cancerous cells would be damaged or killed. In theory, this is the best cancer treatment on earth, but due to corrupt governments we are not aware of anyone who is currently using this protocol.
The FDA also shut down a clinic in Oklahoma which was using DMSO and Vitamin C, three botanicals, and other protocols. It was an excellent cancer treatment. We estimate their 5-year cure rate, based on their treatment, was over 80% and possibly over 90%.
The FDA shut down two clinics on the same weekend that used ozone saunas. These clinics no doubt used additional treatments, but these clinics likely had 70% cure rates.
Dr. Philip Binzel, an M.D., had an 80% cure rate using a molecule called “laetrile.” The FDA tried to shut him down by blocking the import of liquid laetrile into the United States from Mexico. Fortunately, Dr. Binzel won that court case.
Don’t forget that Dr. Rife had a 100% cure rate and that Dr. Kelley had a 90% cure rate.
What this means is that the Food and Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, etc. KNOW how to cure cancer because they have shut down many cures for cancer!!!! But they choose to suppress these treatments instead of use them.
Now compare the cure rates of cancer treatments the FDA shut down, or tried to shut down, with the less than 3% cure rates of the FDA (i.e. 3% is the cure rate of the drugs approved by the FDA), the medical schools, the “research” of the pharmaceutical companies, the “research” of the American Cancer Society and Susan G. Komen Foundation, etc. etc.
Do the math.
Some natural medicine clinics use Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT), which uses insulin to allow chemotherapy to target cancer cells. Insulin is not as good as DMSO at getting chemotherapy to target cancer cells, but it is a very good clinic treatment.
Because natural medicine researchers cannot use chemotherapy the ICRF has designed the DMSO and chlorine dioxide protocol (DMSO/CD). This protocol does not kill cancer cells, it reverts them into normal cells!! It is one of the items in the Dirt Cheap Protocol.
I cannot repeat this often enough: a cancer patient would be strongly, strongly advised that when they finish their main cancer treatment (e.g. the Photon Protocol or Cellect-Budwig protocol as examples) they wait three weeks and then go on the Dirt Cheap Protocol for several months to “clean up” the cancer cells and continue to rebuild the immune system.
In summary, the FDA and AMA refer to cancer treatments with 90% cure rates as “unproven” and persecute these treatments. Their own “proven” protocols have 3% cure rates!! Deceptive semantics are a key element of the media and orthodox medicine.
Cancer Researchers in the Past and Today
The root cause of cancer was discovered in 1890 by William Russell (1852-1940). The brilliant Dr. Russell saw microbes both inside and outside of the cancer cells. It was obvious that the microbes inside the cancer cells were the ones causing the cancer.
The cancer microbe was studied in detail in the early 1900s and was found to be highly pleomorphic. Many years later another microbiologist, Gaston Naessens, counted 16 different sizes and shapes of the cancer microbe. (see the book: The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens, by Christopher Bird). The medical establishment in Canada was so delighted with his discovery that they had him thrown in jail!!
You see, if cancer is caused by microbes that are inside the cancer cells, then it is easy to cure cancer; just kill the microbes inside the cancer cells!! But no medical establishment wants people to know that cancer can be cured. They want cancer to be a mysterious disease that will never be cured!!
The size and shape of the microbe is a function of the pH inside the cancer cell. The higher the pH, the smaller the microbe.
The higher the pH the more lethargic the cancer microbes become and the cancer spreads more slowly. Natural medicine practitioners take advantage of this fact and frequently use highly alkaline protocols to slow down the spread of the cancer and in many cases these treatments can cure the cancer.
Also, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, in the 1930s, also knew that it was microbes which were inside the cancer cells which caused cancer. By knowing this he developed a gentle electromedicine device to kill these microbes. This device had a 100% cure rate and it did nothing but kill microbes inside the cancer cells.
The AMA and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) were so incensed that he was curing cancer that the AMA tried to “buy him out.” When he refused the FDA came in and destroyed his lab and his machines which had not already been sold and delivered.
Researchers since then have found three of his original machines, which had been sold before the FDA destroyed his lab. They have made the specifications of his equipment public information. RifeVideos.com
Dr. Virginia Livingston’s team of cancer researchers discovered why cancer cells have DNA damage. They discovered that the microbes inside the cancer cells get inside the cell nucleus and their DNA mixes with the DNA of the cell, which changes the DNA of the cancer cells.
In fact, the concept that the DNA of a microbe, which gets inside of a human cell nucleus, and thus changes the DNA of the human cell, is at the heart of gene therapy!! This is not some strange theory, it is a concept which is used in modern medicine to treat genetic diseases.
My point is that the Livingston team discovered that the DNA damage occurs AFTER the cell is already cancerous (i.e. after the microbes are already inside the cancer cells)!!
Dr. Livingston designed a vaccine to kill these microbes and obviously died without any recognition from orthodox medicine for her team’s critical discovery. Instead, orthodox medicine has ignored her team’s discovery and still claims that it is DNA damage that causes cancer!! This gives them an excuse to claim that a cure for cancer is 50 years away. A cure for cancer will always be 50 years away according to anyone who is in bed with the pharmaceutical industry, such as the American Cancer Society.
By claiming that DNA damage causes cancer, the public believes that cancer will never be cured. But Virginia Livingston was curing cancer with a vaccine she developed.
This DNA damage (which is a result of cancer, not a cause of cancer), is what all large “cancer research” organizations claim cause cancer!! They are spending billions of dollars trying to fix this DNA damage instead of trying to safely target and kill the cancer cells using Mother Nature (who already knows how to target and kill cancer cells) or by killing the microbes inside the cancer cells (which reverts the cancer cells into normal cells), which is how Dr. Rife cured cancer!!
The second concept I wish to discuss is regarding the nature of cancer cells. A Nobel Prize was awarded in 1931 for the discovery that the defining characteristic of cancer cells is low ATP energy. ATP is a molecule which is made inside the mitochondria, which is inside of all cells. There are thousands of mitochondria inside of all cells and the ATP is what provides cells their energy.
So why do cancer cells have low ATP energy and who cares if there are microbes inside the cancer cells?
In 2004, an ICRF cancer researcher tied these two major discoveries together by explaining the mechanism of how these microbes, which are inside of the cancer cells, block the production of ATP molecules. In other words, he explained that cancer is caused because the microbes inside the cancer cells block the production of ATP in two different ways.
It is beyond the scope of this article to explain this mechanism, and its ramifications, but if you are interested see the “What Causes Cancer” article which is linked to on the left side-bar (i.e. the “left side-bar” is the column of links on the left side of most pages).
This discovery supported the claim of Dr. Rife that if you kill these microbes the cancer cells will revert into normal cells. They become normal cells again (or for the first time in many cases) because with no microbes inside the cell the ATP energy will be restored and the cell will be healthy again!!
This discovery has led to several new, highly effective natural cancer treatments, particularly DMSO, MSM and honey protocols. The DMSO, MSM and honey are “Trojan Horses” to get microbe-killing substances inside of cancer cells to kill the microbes. DMSO is actually used by one major natural medicine cancer clinic, the Camelot Cancer Care clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma. However, this clinic was shut down by the thugs in the FDA in early 2013.
This discovery has also explained how some previously existing natural cancer treatments worked.
The discovery also led to the fact that some natural cancer treatments would conflict with each other (the conflict is not dangerous, but one treatment may neutralize another treatment). The conflict can occur because one type of cancer treatment is trying to lower ATP energy (to cause the cancer cells to fall apart), and another treatment is trying to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells, which would raise ATP energy because when the microbes are gone, so is the reason ATP energy in cancer cells stays low.
For example, do not mix Paw Paw (which causes cancer cells to fall apart by lowering ATP energy) with the High RF Frequency Protocol, which was designed to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and thus revert the cancer cells into normal cells. When you kill the microbes the ATP energy rises because there is nothing to block the creation of ATP energy (the microbes are what block the ATP energy).
Thus, one protocol is lowering the ATP energy and the other protocol is incidentally raising the ATP energy. The Paw Paw treatment will be worthless. The High RF Frequency Protocol will work just fine because it is interested in microbes; it is not directly interested in ATP energy.
A different ICRF cancer researcher designed the protocol for using the “High RF Frequency Protocol” for cancer. It is one thing to have the equipment and another thing to know how to use it.
Let us partially summarize what the cancer microbe does.
First, the cancer microbe largely or totally blocks the production of ATP molecules in the mitochondria (and the cancer cells have to revert to another method, fermentation, to make enough ATP molecules to stay alive).
Second, the DNA of the cancer microbes is what causes the DNA damage of the cancer cells after the cell is already cancerous or is beginning to become cancerous.
Third, the cancer microbe also excretes enzymes that coat the outside of the cancer cells so the immune system cannot identify them as cancer cells and thus the immune system cannot safely target and kill them. The existence of the enzyme coating has been known about for more than 50 years in natural medicine.
In fact, over 50 years ago there were natural cancer treatments (e.g. proteolytic enzymes) that stripped away these enzyme coatings so the immune system could identify the cancer cells and kill them. Dr. Kelley used proteolytic enzymes as part of his treatment.
The existence of this protein coating is proof that DNA damage is not the cause of cancer. How could DNA damage create a coating of enzymes on the surface of cancer cells??
Fourth, Dr. Mathias Rath, MD, who had to flee the United States to avoid being arrested for curing cancer, discovered that these enzymes (or different enzymes excreted by these microbes, we don’t know) also cut a path across tissue so the cancer cells could spread more easily.
It is beyond the scope of this article to go any further, but my point is that there has been researcher after researcher who knew about the cancer microbes inside the cancer cells. And there have been a growing number of clever tactics developed to kill these microbes.
When you kill all of the microbes inside of a cancer cell, the cancer cell will revert into a normal cell because there is nothing to block the production of ATP energy. This is the ideal way to cure cancer because there are no dead cells and no debris from dead cells.
But most natural cancer treatments work in other ways.
Some treatments use natural substances that target and kill cancer cells. Laetrile, or Vitamin B17, is a perfect example. Carrots and purple grapes both contain multiple nutrients that can target and kill cancer cells. One researcher thinks that it is the oxalic acid in carrots that cures the cancer. He may be right.
Other treatments work by supercharging the immune system and then letting the immune system deal with the cancer. One example is Dr. Bob Beck, who had a PhD in physics. He designed a cancer treatment that removed all microbes from the bloodstream and found out that by doing this the immune system was supercharged and the immune system could get rid of the cancer cells!!
The problem with building the immune system is that it is a slow process. Many cancer patients today who seek out natural cancer treatments have been sent home to die and do not have the time left to live to have their immune system rebuilt after it had been damaged by chemotherapy. But even these patients can benefit from the Bob Beck Protocol, but it should not be their primary protocol.
While the Photon Protocol works by killing microbes, primarily inside the organs, which gets the immune system functioning again, it also provides key nutrients to the cells, such as in the immune system, the Photon devices directly energize cells to keep the patient alive, the devices also pump the lymph system, etc.
Some treatments work by using super-nutrients to “keep the patient alive” (so they have more time to treat their cancer) by using special cell-energizing supplements. The Budwig Diet is a good example. The Photon Genius, an electromedicine device, is the best way to energize cells quickly (see the “Weak Cancer Patients” article and the “Understanding Treating Cancer” article).
In fact, the best natural medicine treatments today use a combination of tactics. One highly nutritional protocol “keeps the patient alive” and at the same time other treatments are dealing with the cancer cells and yet other treatments are building the immune system, others are killing microbes in different places, etc.
The four most powerful treatments on this website, the Photon Protocol, Cellect-Budwig Protocol, Cesium Chloride Protocol and BX Antitoxins, are all multi-pronged approaches, and all come with expert support.
These two protocols were combined because we were getting some extremely advanced cancer patients. Using similar logic, the Dirt Cheap Protocol (usually without the Kelmun protocol due to too much alkalinity) can be combined with any other protocol.
Remember that many other treatments can be combined with these treatments. For example, either High RF Frequency Protocol can be combined with any of the other protocols.
Some newer protocols use the technology of killing the microbes inside the cancer cells, such as the High RF Frequency Protocol, the DMSO protocols and honey protocols. Most of the DMSO protocols are on the website of the Independent Cancer Research Foundation. I support the DMSO protocols because I have been researching DMSO since 2004.
In theory, DMSO could cure cancer in one day, as it does not stress the stomach because it can be taken transdermally (i.e. through the skin). However we are concerned about Herxheimer’s (which is severe brain fog caused by the release of mycotoxins by dead microbes) so we have not tried to cure cancer in one day with this protocol.
However, “brain fog” is not dangerous and a patient who understands what causes brain fog, and can mentally prepare for it, could use very high doses of DMSO and chlorine dioxide (DMSO/CD).
In fact, I probably had the worst case of brain fog in history because I accidentally overdosed on a super-microbe-killing substance used in water treatment plants. It felt like most of my brain was dead. But I knew exactly what was going on in my brain so I just slept it off. So if the patient is old enough to know what to expect, they can be prepared for it.
As already mentioned, there is one outstanding clinic which uses DMSO to “carry” microbe-killing substances inside of cancer cells. It is a 30-day protocol (the Camelot Cancer Care clinic – see the Clinics article).
The MSM protocols were designed to do this also and we hoped they would be as effective as the DMSO protocols (because the MSM molecule is almost identical to the DMSO molecule and MSM does not cause the body odor of DMSO), but so far the DMSO protocols seem to be significantly more effective. However, MSM is used to help clean lactic acid out of the blood and do other things, so it has its own benefits.
My point is that it is common to combine multiple approaches in the same treatment. That is what the experts work on accomplishing.
This is just an introduction to modern natural medicine treatments. The “Understanding Treating Cancer” article, at the top of the left side-bar, goes into more issues. You might also want to read the “What Causes Cancer” article which goes into more detail about what is going on inside the cancer cells: What Causes Cancer Article
How To Use the Cancer Tutor Website
This website endorses many natural cancer treatments, several of which are far more powerful than what Dr. Kelley could have put together in his lifetime. These powerful treatments had to be designed because such a high percentage of the cancer patients we work with have already been “sent home to die” by orthodox medicine and they need treatments that work a lot faster than the Kelley protocol.
Fortunately, with new electromedicine equipment, new supplements, new concepts, etc. some very powerful protocols have been put together. Some of these treatments are listed on the left side bar (e.g. Photon Protocol, Cellect-Budwig, Cesium Chloride, Bob Wright Protocol, etc.) and many more are listed at the bottom of this home page.
It should also be mentioned that these are “protocols,” meaning they include several individual treatments. Many people have tried to cure their cancer with one item, such as carrot juice. While this has worked many times, most cancer patients have already had chemotherapy or radiation, or they have a very fast-spreading type of cancer, and for these patients it can take a lot more than just carrot juice for them to survive their cancer.
A “protocol” is designed by experts to include several synergistic treatments that are designed to be both redundant (i.e. multiple individual treatments do the same thing to make sure it gets done right) and synergistic.
Almost all of the treatments/protocols listed on the left side-bar come with technical support from a natural medicine expert, one of which is a medical doctor. But all of the non-medical doctors have many years of experience with natural medicine.
There are also articles for specific types of cancer, which provide a recommended protocol for that type of cancer.
If you have a type of cancer that is not listed on the left side-bar, find the type of cancer which is closest in terms of these two issues: location of the cancer and the similarity of the type of tissue.
Also look at the left side bar for articles on issues that may apply to your situation (e.g. “Dangerous Tumors” or “Weak Cancer Patients”).
Health insurance policies are approved by state insurance departments. Only one state has health insurance that covers natural medicine, that we know about. This gives you an idea of how deep the money of the pharmaceutical industry goes to buy corrupt politicians. When a minor child has cancer, some states force the parents to have the child treated by orthodox medicine.
Family support for using natural medicine is critical!! The mental attitude of the patient is very important to survival, and family support is a major part of that issue!! The family must get behind the treatment decision, even if they do not understand the treatment.
If you still can’t decide on a natural treatment, study the Photon Protocol, the Cellect-Budwig protocol, the Cesium Chloride protocol and the BX Antitoxins article (see the left side-bar) and select from among these four protocols. These are the four most powerful treatments that can deal with any type of cancer. All come with expert support.
Also read the “Understanding Treating Cancer” article at the top of the left side-bar. This is critical to read, especially for advanced cancer patients.
See also the “Dirt Cheap Protocol” and “Inexpensive Cancer Treatments” articles. These articles can get you started on a treatment TODAY – within hours (e.g. “honey and turmeric” can both be purchased at a health food store today and it is a cancer treatment), while you decide on, and order your main treatment.
Study the titles of the other articles as well to see if they apply to you (by the way, we can’t afford proofreaders, and don’t have time to work with our volunteers, so forgive our typos!!).
If you are in an emergency situation, visit your local hospital. There are many situations where orthodox medicine really is important!
How To Help The ICRF So The ICRF Can Help You
The biggest problem cancer researchers face (who do not work for the pharmaceutical industry), is not cancer, it is manpower, meaning financial support. The media will never admit we exist, and as a result, our contributions are measured in thousands of dollars a year, not many, many millions of dollars a year.
We know how to deal with the cancer. But we do not have the funds to hire the manpower to help deal with routine tasks. As a result, our research and time with cancer patients suffers because the researchers are busy doing routine tasks.
For example, because of the media, many scores of millions of dollars are pumped into orthodox “research” every year. However, the total contributions to the Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF), in 2012, was less than $20,000. We cannot afford to hire a single employee even though our researchers/officers are unpaid. Most of the contributions we receive help cancer patients pay for their treatments because they cannot afford to pay for them.
Because of the lack of staff in the ICRF, cancer patients literally die every year. This should be obvious, but let me explain one reason why.
Many, many thousands of cancer patients have visited this website. Many of them needed to send us an email to ask key questions about their cancer, but they could not find our email address on this website. The reason that very few articles have our email address on them is because we don’t have the staff to answer all of the emails this website would generate if we put our email address on the left side-bar or on the bottom box of every article.
We apologize for not making our email address open information, but there is nothing we can do about it. We need to sleep.
The only way to fix this is to hire staff or find more volunteers.
The only cancer research organizations that are looking out for your best interests are the ICRF and the American Anti-Cancer Institute. Other natural medicine research organizations have tried to start-up, but we are not aware that any of them has ever raised enough money to become operational. The ICRF has been around since 2004 and we still cannot afford to hire a part-time employee, much less a full time employee.
The media diverts all cancer research money to the orthodox cancer researchers who effectively work for the pharmaceutical industry.
The bottom line is that we would appreciate your support, whether financial or in spreading the word.
If you want to contribute to the ICRF, here is our official website: ICRF Website
As a final “big picture” note, we strongly, strongly recommend the reader buy or watch the video: Thrive – What On Earth Will It Take which goes into the conspiracy against the American people in great detail. Because the owners of the media are part of this vast, well-organized conspiracy of the ultra-wealthy (e.g. the Bilderbergers or Bilderberg Group), they obviously won’t expose themselves. But this highly professional video does expose it from banking to energy to cancer, etc.!!!!!
The video was made by Foster Gamble, a member of the Gamble family, of “Proctor and Gamble” fame. It is a high quality movie with a good vision of the conspiracy. And it is free if you watch it online. See: The Thrive Movement (The movie is FREE online or you can download it!!)
The movie is also on YouTube: Thrive Movie on YouTube
The Experts in Alternative Cancer Treatments
Many of the alternative cancer treatments, for home use, have expert telephone/Skype support available for free or for a very modest fee (usually around $250 total)!! This is critical to understand because the average person would have no clue how to put together a complete alternative cancer treatment!!! All of the support people, whether at a clinic or by telephone, are experts in alternative medicine.
I cannot emphasize this enough: it is impossible for me to put on this website enough information on how to use these complex treatments in every possible situation!!
Working with an expert is a very small part of the cost of the protocol, but it is absolutely required because the experts know what to look for in a specific cancer case!! There have been too many cases where someone tried to use this website to put together their own protocol. It is generally a disaster because these protocols are used in many different complex situations!!
For example, suppose a person has a tumor wrapped around an artery. Using the wrong protocol could cause this tumor to swell and enlarge, even temporarily, thus cutting off the blood supply!!
RULES #1, #2, and #3: WORK WITH AN EXPERT OR GO TO A CLINIC!!
Rules #4, #5 and #6: Never, never, never try to treat your cancer at home by yourself, no matter what your background!! Alternative cancer treatments are highly specialized and carefully designed and every cancer case is different.
Another problem cancer patients have is caused by them not doing what they are told. We understand why our protocols are the way they are, so to ignore our advice is not likely to lead to good results.
Another major problem we have to deal with is money. Many people just cannot afford the most effective protocols. That is precisely why I designed the “Dirt Cheap Protocol” and several individual treatments. See the left side-bar for “Inexpensive Cancer Treatments.”
Introduction to (Gentle!) Electromedicine in Alternative Medicine
While most people have a general idea about what nutritional protocols do for cancer patients, they have no clue what “electromedicine” devices are designed to do. This is a completely new concept to most cancer patients.
But do not confuse the very, very gentle electromedicine of alternative medicine with the barbaric “radiation therapy” of orthodox medicine. In many cases, when using electromedicine, the patient barely knows the device is turned on!! The exception is the Photon Genius, which is like standing or sitting in a sauna, but it does far more than an infra-red sauna!!
Electromedicine devices fall into one of three categories: 1) They are designed to kill microbes in the bloodstream, lymph system, etc. 2) They are designed to kill microbes which are inside the cancer cells (see the “What Causes Cancer” article) 3) They are designed to kill microbes and parasites in the organs to energize organs and the immune system to deal with the “root cause” of the cancer.
Electromedicine devices cannot kill cancer cells directly because they cannot differentiate between a cancer cell and a normal cell. Well, that is not entirely true because some newer protocols are being researched which use minerals to allow an electromedicine device to target cancer cells (e.g. Kanzius). But I will not talk about these devices because they are experimental and their safety is far from being adequately tested.
Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, designed his device to kill microbes which were inside of the cancer cells. That is why his device had a “carrier frequency.”If you can kill all of the microbes inside the cancer cells the cancer cells will be able to restore their metabolism and will revert into normal cells.
I am going to repeat that in another way: many of today’s alternative cancer treatments revert cancer cells into normal cells!! That is the best way to cure cancer because there is no debris from dead cancer cells in the body. In fact, many of the newer nutritional protocols work that way also, such as the DMSO, MSM and honey protocols.
More than a hundred electromedicine experts have tried to replicate Rife’s technology. More than one of these “Rife Machines” has been very effective against cancer!!
High RF Frequency Devices (Plasma and Pad)
One research group had enough money to track down some original Rife Machines which were sold and delivered before the AMA shut Rife down back in 1939.
Because of these original machines, the Rife’s two methods which used either “High Frequencies” or “Low Audio Frequencies” matched to a specific carrier wave, is now understood and used.
Using frequency generating equipment which uses either electrodes (e.g. High RF Frequency Device – 15 Watt) or the plasma amplifier (e.g. High RF Frequency Device – Plasma), Rife’s original frequencies can now be used by those who want to use the method which Rife had such extraordinary success with. Using the Rife method can be a complete cancer treatment, but we always recommend nutritional protocols be added for multiple reasons.
Beware: Most of the brands of so called “Rife Machines” available on the market today are totally ineffective for cancer because they are underpowered or do not have the proper frequency range, carrier wave, etc. But a few are highly effective.
On this website we will give the information you need to find a frequency generator and plasma amplifier which can output Rife’s frequencies using the original methods. The company that builds this electronic test equipment does not call their equipment a “Rife Machine.” Their equipment is considered electronic test equipment.
Where to Buy the ICRF “Research Model” High RF Frequency Generator and Plasma Tube Amplifier:
Copy and paste the above website address into your web browser. Go to the vendor’s website that sells the High RF Frequency Generator and oscillator amplifier which can broadcast high RF frequencies using a plasma ray tube antenna. You’ll be able to see photographs of the generator and amplifiers including full specifications and pricing at their website.
The Photon Genius and Photon Genie
The best cell-energizing equipment (for weak cancer patients), by far, that can be used at home or a clinic, is the Photon Genius and its “little brother,” the Photon Genie.
The Photon Protocol is a two step-process:
First, identify which microbes and parasites are in the organs and design a nutritional protocol to kill them.
Second, energize the weak cells in the organs, and elsewhere, to more quickly restore the immune system so it can deal with the cancer.
The Photon Genius, at $25,000, is priced out of many people’s budget, but every cancer patient can benefit from the Photon Genie, which is only $3,000. Both devices are synergistic with chemotherapy. See the “If Still on Chemo or Radiation” link on the left side-bar.
Either an electrode or plasma high RF frequency generating device is synergistic with either or both of the Photon devices.
The difference between the plasma or electrode frequency generator and the Photon Genius and Photon Genie is that the electrode or plasma devices are designed to revert cancer cells into normal cells (by killing the microbes inside the cancer cells) and kill other microbes in the body.
The Photon devices are also designed to rid the body of microbes (but NOT inside the cancer cells), but they also do many things to fix weak organs, the immune system, etc. The Photon devices are required when the patient has dangerous tumors because they get rid of the root cause of the tumors so that they will go away and not come back. While many protocols can shrink tumors, few can actually keep them from coming back.
When people can only afford one of the electrode or plasma devices or one of the Photon devices, the rule of thumb is this: if the main danger of the cancer is one or more tumors, buy a Photon device (even the Photon Genie). If the main danger of the cancer is the cancer cells (and the tumors, if any, are not considered life threatening), buy an electrode or plasma high RF frequency generating device. If you can afford both, buy both!
The Bob Beck Protocol
Another “electromedicine” protocol is the Bob Beck protocol. The Bob Beck machines were designed to kill the microbes in the bloodstream, lymph system and elsewhere in the body (but not inside the cancer cells). By doing this the immune system is supercharged and the immune system is able to safely kill the cancer cells.
The history of the Bob Beck devices is quite interesting. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, heard about, and sought to recreate, a totally suppressed cure for AIDS which had been accidentally discovered by two medical doctors, Dr. Kaali and Dr. Lyman, at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Dr. Beck was able to create a new cure for AIDS using their discovery!!
However, possibly by accident, he found out that when you totally eliminate all microbes from the body that the immune system is supercharged enough to cure cancer!! This is the Bob Beck Protocol.
The Bob Beck Protocol is an excellent cancer treatment but may take 2 or 3 months to become highly effective because it takes time to safely and completely rid the body of microbes and then it takes more time for the immune system to supercharge itself sans microbes.
In addition, people who have had a lot of chemotherapy may have an abnormally suppressed immune system due to damage to the lining of their stomach and/or colon. But for the money, it is a superb treatment.
The combination of the Rife and Beck devices is the heart of the Plasma-Beck Protocol linked to on the left side-bar. The combination of the Rife and Beck theories are at the heart of the Rife-Beck Protocol, also linked to on the left side-bar. This latter protocol uses a High RF Frequency Generator with linear 10-watt amplifier to act as both a Rife and a Beck protocol.
Because the Beck devices are so inexpensive, they are used in several protocols. The Beck device is slow to become effective, therefore an entire major protocol may be used to “buy time” until the Beck Protocol can supercharge the immune system (e.g. the “Ultimate Simple Protocol” is an example of this tactic).
The Cellect-Budwig protocol is one of the super-protocols (see the “Understanding Treating Cancer” article linked to on the left side-bar) and includes a High RF Frequency Generator for those patients who can afford it. The Cellect-Budwig and plasma frequency generating method have been shown to be very synergistic.
“Synergy” is actually a very good word to get used to. By combining several highly effective alternative cancer treatments together, a great deal of synergy can be achieved!! The “Complete Protocols” section of the left side-bar contains links to several “protocols” (e.g. the Plasma-Beck protocol) which usually, but not always, include several individual cancer treatments which are highly effective by themselves but are collectively even more effective!!”
Many times people use the first cancer treatment they find on the Internet (e.g. hydrogen peroxide, laetrile, carrot juice, etc.). However, it is far, far better to combine several treatments together, especially when the protocol is designed to contain synergistic treatments which have individually cured cancer in some cases.
For example, the “Dirt Cheap Protocol,” which was designed for people who do not have the money for the more expensive protocols, includes more than a dozen cancer treatments which have individually cured some cases of cancer!! It includes other treatments as well.
The reader would not believe how poor many people are after orthodox medicine gets done with them. Over the years I have had to adjust to this reality, such as by finding or designing “dirt cheap” individual treatments or protocols for cancer.
Getting back to the Bob Beck devices, someone with an electrical background can actually build his equipment at home. Schematics are available on this website and his videos on YouTube describe how to make them (see the Bob Beck videos at Granada and Ventura, etc.). The downside of this is that no technical support is available when you build your own devices.
But for those in foreign countries, where they may not be able to afford or import the Beck equipment, the ability to build it at home is a gift from heaven!! Also, many people cannot afford the roughly $1,000 for the pre-made equipment, but hopefully they know someone who can build three of the four devices (which includes the main device – the blood purifier).
His devices can also be purchased pre-made online (e.g. Sota Instruments) which may come with technical support. However, vendors have to be careful what they say about their equipment because of the FDA or their Canadian equivalent. They are watching, like vultures, for the vendors to make “medical claims” about their highly effective (but “unproven”) cancer treatments so they can shut them down.
Because of this persecution cancer patients will not be able to tell which protocols are highly effective and which are not. That is precisely what the FDA and other corrupt organizations want!!
Because of this corruption, many patients will use ineffective treatments and may die. This lowers the image of alternative medicine, which is what the FDA wants. The job of the FDA is to sell drugs, not save lives.
For all practical purposes, the FDA even has their own judges and courts to make sure they never lose. The constitutional protection of “due process” has been urinated on and burned out of the Constitution, as have many other parts of the Constitution. The Constitution cuts into profits and must be ignored.
The reader should very, very, very careful to remember that all vendors of highly effective cancer treatment products are not allowed to make medical claims about their device or product, even if their claims have been proven over and over again!!!
I have heard of many cancer patients becoming frustrated because the vendor they were talking to could not tell them the whole truth about their product or would not answer their questions!!
Sometimes the corruption becomes ridiculous. For example, in Canada the Sota Instruments company is not allowed to call their Bob Beck blood purifier a “blood purifier,” they must call it a “silver pulser.”
Likewise, vendors of “Rife Machines” frequently will not use the term “Rife Machine,” but will call it a “frequency generator.”
Critical Concepts When Treating Cancer
It should be understood that treating newly diagnosed cancer patients versus treating advanced cancer patients (e.g. someone sent home to die) is like the difference between putting out a fire in the kitchen versus putting out a fire which has already engulfed 5 rooms.
Furthermore, it should be understood that not all alternative cancer treatments are equally effective!! Some alternative cancer treatments can be compared to a “garden hose” and others can be compared to a “fire hose.”
The cancer patient must choose an alternative cancer treatment that is strong enough for their situation and they must work with an expert in that treatment to teach them what they need to know to use it! The choice of an expert is as important as the treatment itself!
Many cancer patients have emailed me (note: I do not broadcast my email address because my time is severely restricted) and described their cancer treatment. Many times I have seen nothing but a long list of garden hoses!!
They do not understand!!
To have a good chance of survival they generally need four things: 1) At least one or two fire hoses (the fire hoses usually have expert support available), 2) Expert telephone support or support at a clinic which specializes in alternative cancer treatments, 3) Several garden hoses (which may be built into the overall treatment to “buy time,” relieve pain, etc.) and 4) A positive mental attitude with family support.
Memorize that list!!!!
Let me give you an example of why it is important to identify the highly potent alternative cancer treatments and an expert.
Suppose you see a testimonial on the Internet about how carrot juice cured a newly diagnosed cancer patient. You can assume the testimonial is true, but does that mean an advanced cancer patient can be cured with the same protocol? The answer may be a resounding ‘NO’. The patient who was cured may have been someone with a slow growing cancer and who had never had chemotherapy.
Every case is different, which is why you need to work with an expert.
It is critical to understand that by the time a person has had extensive orthodox cancer treatments the number of viable options to treat their cancer has dwindled from several hundred (when they were first diagnosed) to perhaps two dozen (when they complete their orthodox treatments)!!!
Another critical aspect of treating cancer is the cancer patient’s attitude!! This is as important as the treatment itself!!
Some alternative cancer treatment clinics in Germany give advanced cancer patients art lessons!! That is how important a positive mental attitude is to creating a strong “will to survive.”
I worked on one cancer case where the patient should have been dead two years before I started to work with her!! She was alive only because she had two small children and she refused to die (and she did a lot of praying)!!
Cancer patients must be distracted away from their condition and be encouraged to move forward as if they knew they were going to survive. Negative attitudes are not an option!! Cancer patients must be continuously reminded that they have loved ones who want them to survive!
About Clinics That Use Alternative Cancer Treatments
Some cancer patients, or their families, want the patient to be treated at a clinic where a medical doctor or naturopath can actually work with the patient face-to-face. In fact, there are many, many alternative cancer clinics around the world.
For example, dozens of American medical doctors have switched from orthodox medicine to alternative medicine and started a clinic in the United States, Mexico, Central America or South America. They may leave the United States so they can have less fear of persecution.
Most states do not allow any kind of alternative cancer treatment clinic, but several do. I suspect that Nevada has the most.
While going to a clinic is a good idea, do not assume that all clinic treatments are better than all home treatments!! Several home treatments are more effective than many of the clinic treatments because some of the clinics do not keep up with technology as well as the full time researchers. Plus, the clinics may be slower to update their technologies.
But to be honest, some of the best protocols and cancer experts are at clinics.
But it is very, very important for a person to understand that a cancer patient is not “cured” until their immune system is back to normal. Chemotherapy and radiation are very, very damaging to a person’s immune system!!
A clinic can only focus on treating cancer cells because it is impossible to rebuild the immune system in three weeks (which is how long a typical clinic treatment lasts).
Thus, a person who goes to a clinic with a damaged immune system will still have a damaged immune system when they get back home!!
The only thing that will completely restore a cancer patient to health is a long-term home treatment because it takes many months or several years to totally rebuild someone’s immune system.
To understand this consider that everyone, even former cancer patients, get new cancer cells forming in their body all the time. If the immune system is not able to keep up with the new cancer cells, the cancer will come back (this is called “regression”).
Thus, when a person is done with their clinic treatment they will need a home treatment anyway because no clinic can rebuild the immune system in three weeks!! Most clinics provide a “home treatment” when they have completed their treatment, but I can assure you (based on case studies) that the top home treatments on this website are far stronger than the treatments provided by the clinics.
I do not mean to downplay clinics, however. They can provide a giant boost to the survival chances of a patient, but just be aware than when the clinic treatment is completed, you will still need to pick a potent home treatment from this website or another top website when you get home.
Also, watch your budget. If you come home from a clinic “dead broke,” you will not be able to afford the best of the long-term home treatments.
There are some excellent alternative clinics in Germany, Mexico and the United States (and many other countries) and there are some bad clinics in all of these countries. You have to do your homework!!
To see a special article on alternative medicine clinics, see the left side-bar: “Alternative Cancer Clinics.”
What to Do Next!! [Step-By-Step]
Step 1: Look on the left side-bar to see if your type of cancer is listed. If your type of cancer is listed, the article will give you some ideas about what needs to be done and which alternative cancer treatments may help.
Step 2: Read the articles: “Understanding Treating Cancer with Alternative Medicine” article; (see the left side-bar) and the “[The ICRF] Reference Manual” article; (see the left side-bar)
These articles will give you more ideas about the various alternative cancer treatments available to help you.
Step 3: Read the article on “Special Situations” linked to on the left side-bar. This article is more up-to-date than the eBook and has a lot of information about which special treatments you may need to add to the main treatment.
Step 4: Read the cancer treatment articles on the cancer treatments (e.g. Bill Henderson) you think may help your situation (see the left side-bar in most cases, but some of the treatments may only be listed on this page). These articles will give you a clue as to how strong these treatments are (each treatment is “rated” in the article).
Step 5a: (If you pick a home treatment) Once you pick your main treatment(s) for your situation and your budget, then track down the expert who supports the primary protocol and discuss with the expert whether he or she agrees with you!! The expert can guide you in what can and cannot be added to the primary protocol. Their fees, if they work with you, are frequently between free and $250!!
Step 5b: (If you want to go to a clinic) See the article on clinics linked to on the left side bar. Because there are so many clinics that I do not know about, it is recommended you set up a consultation with Frank Cousineau to ask him which clinics may be best for your situation. There are also inexpensive eBooks on some of the best clinics in Germany, Mexico and the U.S. (though certainly not all good clinics are mentioned in these books).
The next section has links to a number of very critical articles and free eBooks on treating cancer with alternative cancer treatments. Spend a lot of time reading the articles!
R. Webster Kehr Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.
Some of the FREE eBooks and Articles on this Website
Free EBook: The Treatment of Stage IV Cancers [Must Read]
A free eBook has been written for advanced cancer patients. This eBook should NOT replace working with an expert, but will help give the patient a clear understanding of what is going on during the treatment (Outdated)!! The Treatment of Stage IV Cancers
Free EBook: Treatments For Strong Stage III and Below Cancer Patients
Special Situations Cancer Patients Face [Must Read]
This is another article which is generally more up-to-date than the eBook. This is one of the most important articles on this website!!! This article details many different special situations cancer patients face (e.g. cachexia, damage by chemotherapy, etc.) and how to deal with these issues with alternative medicine: Special Situations Cancer Patients Face
Are Alternative Cancer Treatments For Real?
For those new to alternative cancer treatments, who need to know why alternative cancer treatments are far more effective than orthodox cancer treatments, read this article: Are Alternative Cancer Treatments For Real?
The Cancer Tutor Rating System of Cancer Treatments
Not all alternative cancer treatments are equally effective. In fact, only a very small percentage of all of the alternative cancer treatments are potent enough to help advanced cancer patients. For this reason the Cancer Tutor website “rates” the strength of cancer treatments. The Cancer Tutor Rating System of Cancer Treatments
The “Cancer Diet”
The “cancer diet” is a list of the foods a cancer patient should and should not eat. Without a solid cancer diet all alternative cancer treatments are virtually a waste of time because the patient will be feeding their cancer cells at the same time they are trying to cure their cancer. Here is the key article: The Cancer Diet (English) The Cancer Diet (Russian)
Because health insurance companies generally do not pay for alternative medicines or alternative cancer clinics, and because most cancer patients who start with orthodox cancer treatments are dead broke from paying their co-pay, many cancer patients need alternative cancer treatments which are virtually free. See this article: Inexpensive (yet potent) Cancer Treatments
Can your phone or tablet give you cancer? A large group of international scientists thinks so.
Almost 200 scientists and academics from over three dozen countries have issued a letter calling for the United Nations, World Health Organization and governments around the world to tighten regulations around electro-magnetic field (EMF) exposure coming from handheld devices.
Anthony Miller, University of Toronto Professor Emeritus at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, is one of 190 signatories, including eight Canadians, to the letter. He noted that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has already flagged EMF as a possible human carcinogen.
The letter’s signatories also say much of the research saying EMF is safe is commissioned and paid for by telecom companies. Miller expresses concern that this practice is prevalent in Canada.
“I think part of the problem here is that the reassurances we keep getting from the manufacturers and distributors of WiFi – Rogers, Bell and whatever – and Health Canada are not sufficiently satisfactory, particularly for the possible risks to children,” Miller said in a conversation with Yahoo Canada.
Health Canada experts were unavailable for an interview, but a response to the letter was issued late yesterday.
“The prevailing scientific evidence demonstrates that the health of Canadians is well protected from RF (Radio Frequency) energy by the human exposure limits in Safety Code 6,” the Health Canada statement said, citing the relevant regulatory provision.
“Health Canada’s conclusions are consistent with the findings of other international bodies and regulators, including the World Health Organization, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and the United Kingdom Health Protection Agency.”
But Miller said those findings aren’t consistent with the latest research.
“A recent study in Sweden, and also a large study in France, say the potential risks are more than the IARC group felt, and this should be regarded as a possible human carcinogen – category 2B. Once you’re in that situation, then it’s impossible to ignore it.”
Miller stresses that many cancers result from prolonged exposure to a carcinogen. Just because specific cases cannot be immediately identified, it doesn’t mean potentially dangerous damage isn’t being done, he said.
“We’re talking about people of all ages now being cumulatively exposed to radio frequency fields, and those particularly who use their cell phones and hold them against their ear, and tend to use the same side of the head most of the time, as most of us do. Also children who are exposed to EMF from laptops – particularly in schools where this can be fairly prominent.
Health Canada said it is continuously monitoring new research on the long-term effects of RF and EMF.
“Departmental scientists considered all available peer-reviewed scientific studies when developing the exposure limits in the revised Safety Code 6,” the starment said.
“Should new scientific evidence arise demonstrating that exposure to RF fields poses a health risk to Canadians, Health Canada will take the appropriate action to safeguard the health of Canadians.”
For Miller, that’s not enough.
“People must understand there is a potential hazard, and perhaps they’ll take action. And that is what Health Canada is meant to do – protect the health of the public.
“We have to act now, in my view, and that is why I signed this statement.”
Last Edit: May 13, 2015 20:37:12 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
“Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud, and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.” (source)
The above quote comes from Linus Pauling, Ph.D, and two time Nobel Prize winner in chemistry (1901-1994). He is considered one of the most important scientists in history. He is one of the founders of quantum chemistry and molecular biology, who was also a well known peace activist. He was invited to be in charge of the Chemistry division of the Manhattan Project, but refused. He has also done a lot of work on military applications, and has pretty much done and seen it all when it comes to the world of science. A quick Google search will suffice if you’d like to learn more about him.
This man has been around the block, and obviously knows a thing or two about this subject. And he’s not the only expert from around the world expressing similar beliefs and voicing his opinion.
Here is another great example of a hard hitting quote when it comes to scientific fraud and manipulation. It comes from Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and long time Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to be one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. I apologize if you have seen it before in my articles, but it is quite the statement. “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine” (source)
The list goes on and on. Dr. John Bailer, who spent 20 years on the staff of the National Cancer Institute and is also a former editor of its journal, publicly stated in a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science that: “My overall assessment is that the national cancer program must be judged a qualified failure. Our whole cancer research in the past 20 years has been a total failure.” (source)
He also alluded to the fact that cancer treatment, in general, has been a complete failure.
Another interesting point is the fact that most of the money donated to cancer research is spent on animal research, which has been considered completely useless by many. For example, in 1981 Dr. Irwin Bross, the former director of the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Research Institute (largest cancer research institute in the world), said that: “The uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well known. For example, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumph due to use of animal model systems. However, here again, these exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed by the same people who get the federal dollars for animal research. There is little, if any, factual evidence that would support these claims. Practically all of the chemotherapeutic agents which are of value in the treatment of human cancer were found in a clinical context rather than in animal studies.” (source)
Today, treating illness and disease has a corporate side. It is an enormously profitable industry, but only when geared towards treatment, not preventative measures or cures, and that’s an important point to consider.
Another quote that relates to my point above was made by Dr. Dean Burk, an American biochemist and a senior chemist for the National Cancer Institute. His paper, “The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constants (source),” published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society in 1934, is one of the most frequently cited papers in the history of biochemistry.
“When you have power you don’t have to tell the truth. That’s a rule that’s been working in this world for generations. And there are a great many people who don’t tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions.” (source)
He also stated that: “Fluoride causes more human cancer deaths than any other chemical. It is some of the most conclusive scientific and biological evidence that I have come across in my 50 years in the field of cancer research.” (source)
In the April 15th, 2015 edition of Lancet, the UK’s leading medical journal, editor in chief Richard Horton stated: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Science has taken a turn toward darkness.” (source)
n 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University, published the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. In the report, he stated: “There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.”
In 2009, the University of Michigan’s comprehensive cancer center published an analysis that revealed popular cancer studies are false, and that there were fabricated results arising due to conflicts of interest. They suggested that the fabricated results were a result of what would work best for drug companies. After all, a large portion of cancer research is funded directly by them. You can read more about that story here.
There is so much information out there, and so much of it is coming from people who have been directly involved in these proceedings. There is really no shortage of credible sources willing to state that we live in a world of scientific fraud and manipulation.
All of this can be attributed to the “corporatocracy” we live in today, where giant corporations owned by a select group of “elite” people have basically taken control over the planet and all of its resources.
This is precisely why so many people are flocking towards alternative treatment, as well as focusing on cancer prevention. Much of what we surround ourselves with on a daily basis has been linked to cancer. Everything from pesticides, GMOs, multiple cosmetic products, certain “foods,” smoking, and much much more. This is something that is never really emphasized, we always seem to just assume that donating money to charities will make the problem go away, despite the fact that their business practices are highly questionable.
That being said, so many people have had success with alternative treatments like cannabis oil – combined with a raw diet or even incorporated into their chemotherapy regimen – that we should not feel as though there is no hope for the future.
The official stance on cannabis is a great example of the very practice of misinformation that I’m talking about. Its anti-tumoral properties have been demonstrated for decades, yet no clinical trials are taking place.
I am going to leave you with this video, as I have done in previous articles. It provides a little food for thought. Ignorance is not the answer, although this information can be scary to consider, it’s nothing to turn a blind eye towards.
Alternative Cancer Cures Exist and Have Been Suppressed - Kimberly Carter Gamble
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA