Anyone else concerned about the new SB277 CA bill that is forcing vaccinations into our kids? I believe it's my responsibility as a mother and practitioner to get our rights back as parents to have a choice. I have a speech delayed child and won't expose her to any additional toxins (latent heat) from vaccines. Anyone else with me on this topic? I am having a petition to overturn SB277 in my office for anyone to sign. We have 30 days to achieve this.
Our goal is to terminate SB277 and to protect parents and their children.
This referendum against SB277 is important to SO many parents of children who would otherwise hit the vaccine mandate at the start of the 2016 school year, because SB277 is slated to go into effect July 2016, right before the school year.
The SB277 referendum will immediately put a stop to that.
If we get the signatures in the next couple of months, this will go to a November 2016 vote. This means that ALL parents will be able to enroll their children in school even if they are in kindergarten or 7th grade in August/September 2016.
So, pass or fail, the referendum effort WILL mean that thousands and thousands of kids will not have to be kicked out of school!
The SB277 supporters know this, and they don't like it.
Won't you help us keep kids in school where they belong? Donate today and sign up to volunteer. We can't do it without you!
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
In case you haven’t noticed, there’s an incremental push right now by the controlling elite to force vaccinations on all Americans, both young and old. And this agenda is gaining considerable traction in California, where legislators are now moving forward with plans to force childhood vaccines on all adults who work in daycare centers, both private and public.
Senate Bill 792, also known as the “Day care facilities: immunizations: exemptions” act, was presented quietly alongside SB 277, which eliminates personal, philosophical and religious vaccine exemptions for children who attend both private and public schools in the Golden State. The bill, as recently heard by the California Assembly Human Services Committee, reads as follows:
This bill, commencing September 1, 2016, would prohibit a day care center or a family day care home from employing any person who has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles.
If passed, SB 792 would represent the first adult vaccine mandate in the U.S. that disallows exemptions for personal reasons, and that threatens criminal penalties for those who fail or refuse to comply. Here’s how Vaccine Impact describes SB 792:
SB 792, would eliminate an adult’s right to exempt themselves from one, some, or all vaccines, a risk-laden medical procedure.
This bill would make California the first state to require mandated vaccinations for all childcare workers, including all private and public school early childhood education programs (Headstart, Private preK and preschools), family daycares, and daycare centers.
SB 792 REPRESENTS MEDICAL VIOLENCE AGAINST ADULTS
An affront to both medical and religious liberty, SB 792 appears to be the wave of the future in New America, where the perceived health of the “herd” is now more important than the health of the individual. Never before in the history of the United States have legislators pushed this hard to literally force vaccine injections on the public under duress.
But why do they feel the need to do this if vaccines really work and are truly safe as claimed? The answer is that vaccines aren’t safe and effective, and more people than ever are acknowledging this truth and opting out of the “requirements” of the system through vaccine exemptions, hence the rush to eliminate these exemptions as quickly as possible, starting with California.
“This bill eliminates medical autonomy, crushes religious freedom, undermines personal freedom, and burdens quality providers with a non-optional series of medical interventions in the form of mandated vaccines that are not even 100% effective,” adds Vaccine Impact.
CONTACT CALIFORNIA LEGISLATORS AND SAY NO TO SB 792
As of this writing, SB 792 awaits a hearing by California’s Committee on Appropriations, having recently passed through the Assembly Human Services Committee with a 6-1 vote. The official vote tally reveals that the following members of this committee voted in FAVOR of passing SB 792:
Ian C. Calderon Kansen Chu Patty Lopez Brian Maienschein Mark Stone Tony Thurmond
You can contact the above individuals here and let them know how you feel about their betrayal of medical freedom in California.
You can also contact the individual members of the Committee on Appropriations and tell them to vote AGAINST SB 792 by visiting: pro.assembly.ca.gov
If Americans sit idly by while corrupt legislators pass incremental bills like SB 277 and SB 792, it will only be a matter of time before even stricter bills come along mandating vaccinations for additional groups of people, until eventually everyone is forced into being vaccinated by the state for the benefit of “public health.”
“Laws like these are forging a burden of responsibility that is collectively shared by everyone,” writes Joshua Krause for GlobalResearch.ca.
“It won’t be long before they try to force vaccines on every adult and child in California. And if they pull it off there, legislators in other states will try to see if they can use the sheepish tyranny of majority rule to force vaccines on their citizens as well.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
The following open letter by a PhD Immunologist completely demolishes the current California legislative initiative to remove all vaccine exemptions. That such a draconian and cynical state statute is under consideration in the ‘Golden State’ is as shocking as it is predictable. After all, it was mysteriously written and submitted shortly after the manufactured-in-Disneyland measles ‘outbreak’.
The indisputable science that is employed by Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD ought to be read by every CA legislator who is entertaining an affirmative vote for SB277. Dr. Obukhanych skillfully deconstructs the many false and fabricated arguments that are advanced by Big Pharma and the U.S Federal Government as they attempt to implement a nationwide Super-Vaccination agenda.
When the California Senate refuses to consider authoritative scientific evidence which categorically proves the dangerous vaccine side effects on the schoolchildren, something is very wrong. Such conduct by the Senate constitutes criminal action that endangers the lives and welfare of children. Their official behavior must be acknowledged for what it is — CRIMINAL — and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD in Immunology
Re: VACCINE LEGISLATION
My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings. Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?
It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement. I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.
IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #1). Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces. Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.
Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.
While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.
The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.
Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters (see appendix for the CDC document, Item #3), meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.
Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae (types a through f).These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #4). The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign. Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.
Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.
In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. No discrimination is warranted. How often do serious vaccine adverse events happen?
It is often stated that vaccination rarely leads to serious adverse events. Unfortunately, this statement is not supported by science. A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established thatvaccination actually leads to an emergency room visit for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their 18-month vaccination appointment (see appendix for a scientific study, Item #5).
When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination must remain a choice for parents, who may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to. Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?
Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:
“The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.”
Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.
Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait. The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.
Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time. Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.
It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals. – 
Taken together, these data make it apparent that elimination of vaccine exemptions, currently only utilized by a small percentage of families anyway, will neither solve the problem of disease resurgence nor prevent re-importation and outbreaks of previously eliminated diseases. Is discrimination against conscientious vaccine objectors the only practical solution?
The majority of measles cases in recent US outbreaks (including the recent Disneyland outbreak) are adults and very young babies, whereas in the pre-vaccination era, measles occurred mainly between the ages 1 and 15. Natural exposure to measles was followed by lifelong immunity from re-infection, whereas vaccine immunity wanes over time, leaving adults unprotected by their childhood shots. Measles is more dangerous for infants and for adults than for school-aged children.
Despite high chances of exposure in the pre-vaccination era, measles practically never happened in babies much younger than one year of age due to the robust maternal immunity transfer mechanism. The vulnerability of very young babies to measles today is the direct outcome of the prolonged mass vaccination campaign of the past, during which their mothers, themselves vaccinated in their childhood, were not able to experience measles naturally at a safe school age and establish the lifelong immunity that would also be transferred to their babies and protect them from measles for the first year of life.
Luckily, a therapeutic backup exists to mimic now-eroded maternal immunity. Infants as well as other vulnerable or immunocompromised individuals, are eligible to receive immunoglobulin, a potentially life-saving measure that supplies antibodies directed against the virus to prevent or ameliorate disease upon exposure (see appendix, Item #8).
In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.
Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health risk.
~ Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD
Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, is the author of the book Vaccine Illusion. She has studied immunology in some of the world’s most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Stanford University in California.
Dr. Obukhanych offers online classes for those who want to gain deeper understanding of how the immune system works and whether the immunologic benefits of vaccines are worth the risks: Natural Immunity Fundamentals.
Item #1. The Cuba IPV Study collaborative group. (2007) Randomized controlled trial of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Cuba. N Engl J Med 356:1536-44
The table below from the Cuban IPV study documents that 91% of children receiving no IPV (control group B) were colonized with live attenuated poliovirus upon deliberate experimental inoculation. Children who were vaccinated with IPV (groups A and C) were similarly colonized at the rate of 94-97%. High counts of live virus were recovered from the stool of children in all groups. These results make it clear that IPV cannot be relied upon for the control of polioviruses.
Item #2. Warfel et al. (2014) Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:787-92
“Baboons vaccinated with aP were protected from severe pertussis-associated symptoms but not from colonization, did not clear the infection faster than naïve [unvaccinated] animals, and readily transmitted B. pertussis to unvaccinated contacts. By comparison, previously infected [naturally-immune] animals were not colonized upon secondary infection.”
Item #3. Meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Tom Harkins Global Communication Center, Atlanta, Georgia, December 11-12, 2013
“Findings indicated that 85% of the isolates [from six Enhanced Pertussis Surveillance Sites and from epidemics in Washington and Vermont in 2012] were PRN-deficient and vaccinated patients had significantly higher odds than unvaccinated patients of being infected with PRN-deficient strains. Moreover, when patients with up-to-date DTaP vaccinations were compared to unvaccinated patients, the odds of being infected with PRN-deficient strains increased, suggesting that PRN-bacteria may have a selective advantage in infecting DTaP-vaccinated persons.”
Item #4. Rubach et al. (2011) Increasing incidence of invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease in adults, Utah, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1645-50
“Four to 12 days post 12 month vaccination, children had a 1.33 (1.29-1.38) increased relative incidence of the combined endpoint compared to the control period, or at least one event during the risk interval for every 168 children vaccinated. Ten to 12 days post 18 month vaccination, the relative incidence was 1.25 (95%, 1.17-1.33) which represented at least one excess event for every 730 children vaccinated. The primary reason for increased events was statistically significant elevations in emergency room visits following all vaccinations.”
Item #6. De Serres et al. (2013) Largest measles epidemic in North America in a decade–Quebec, Canada, 2011: contribution of susceptibility, serendipity, and superspreading events. J Infect Dis 207:990-98
“The largest measles epidemic in North America in the last decade occurred in 2011 in Quebec, Canada.”
“A super-spreading event triggered by 1 importation resulted in sustained transmission and 678 cases.”
“The index case patient was a 30-39-year old adult, after returning to Canada from the Caribbean. The index case patient received measles vaccine in childhood.”
“Provincial [Quebec] vaccine coverage surveys conducted in 2006, 2008, and 2010 consistently showed that by 24 months of age, approximately 96% of children had received 1 dose and approximately 85% had received 2 doses of measles vaccine, increasing to 97% and 90%, respectively, by 28 months of age. With additional first and second doses administered between 28 and 59 months of age, population measles vaccine coverage is even higher by school entry.”
“Among adolescents, 22% [of measles cases] had received 2 vaccine doses. Outbreak investigation showed this proportion to have been an underestimate; active case finding identified 130% more cases among 2-dose recipients.”
Item #7. Wang et al. (2014) Difficulties in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. PLoS One9:e89361
“ ‘poor responders,’ who were re-immunized and developed poor or low-level antibody responses only to lose detectable antibody and develop measles on exposure 2–5 years later.”
“Our ongoing studies suggest that seronegativity after vaccination [for measles] clusters among related family members, that genetic polymorphisms within the HLA [genes] significantly influence antibody levels.”
 LeBaron et al. (2007) Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:294-301
Many physicians and scientists have been telling the truth about vaccines for decades. Unfortunately they get very little, if any, attention in the media or in academia. These people need to be heard and heeded.
The International Medical Council on Vaccination is an association of medical doctors, registered nurses and other qualified medical professionals whose purpose is to counter the messages asserted by pharmaceutical companies, the government and medical agencies that vaccines are safe, effective and harmless. Our conclusions have been reached individually by each member of the Council, after thousands of hours of personal research, study and observation. The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds? Present to the British Society of Ecological Medicine in March 2011 By Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
Neural Dynamics Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, email@example.com
No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to which an individual may never be exposed. This, according to the FDA, places extra emphasis on vaccine safety. Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant. Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.
Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice.
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992;www.dh.gov.uk/en/FreedomOfInformation/Freedomofinformationpublicationschemefeedback/FOIreleases/DH_4135306).
In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:
1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;
2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;
3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;
4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;
5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;
6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;
7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;
8) Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage;
Notably, all of these actions appear to violate the JCVI’s own Code of Practice.
The mandatory vaccination issue is ramping up and according to Dr Gary G Kohls, MD there are 271 new vaccines in Big Pharma’s pipeline. Since Big Pharma and the vaccine pushers and promoters have a “liability exemption”, their business plan represents pure profit and no loss for all of those involved.
According to the excellent research of Dr Sherri Tenpenny, the Department of Health and Human Services launched a program in 2010 called Healthy People 2020. Their goal is to remove all (but medical) school vaccine exemptions and push vaccinations in every arena of our society. Thanks to Executive Order 13335 of Bush Jr (which implemented electronic medical records across the country), tracking our vaccination history will be easy for government-corporations and medical institutions alike.
As Healthy People 2020 rolls out, the only way left for us to protect ourselves and our progeny from toxic vaccines is to get smart about what our so-called government has morphed into and challenge its nonexistent authority.
On In Defense of Humanity last Saturday, we featured a clip of Dr Sherri Tenpenny’s exposé regarding the Healthy People 2020 program. We also played clips of a 2011 interview with the fabulous historical and legal researcher (may she rest in peace) Joyce Rosenwald. Joyce explains the many ways both our history and our legal system have been misrepresented to us and how we are unwittingly consenting to rules (laws) that lack lawful authority.
Please listen to the In Defense of Humanity show of Aug 19, 2015 so you can start to understand that there are lawful ways to refuse to cooperate with the ever-growing vaccination agenda.
Page 39 A person created under de jure law, with the person’s identifying name appearing as prescribed by law and according to the rules of English grammar, is a legal fact. A corrupted “alter ego” version of that name [the STRAWMAN], manufactured under the legal fiction of “right of presumption”, will have credibility only so long as the presumption remains unchallenged. The rule of the world is that anything and everything skates unless you bust it.
In other words, if you consent . . . you can’t complain!
On January 14, 2015, a light measles outbreak occurred in Disneyland. Children both vaccinated for measles, and not, contracted the virus.
This led to legislation proposed by CA Senator Barbara Boxer to eliminate the personal exemption for parents who choose not to vaccinate their child. She hopes to have law in place by Fall 2015 so that no child will be allowed attend private or public school next school season without a current MMR (measles) vaccination, excluding special exceptions where a child is undergoing medical treatment. (Source)
This was quickly followed by UC President, Janet Napalitano, previous head of DHS, to declare that no one will be allowed to attend the UC system of schools unless vaccinated.
As of mid-April mandatory vaccination legislation has expanded to over 15 states while Oregon and Washington pro choice advocates kept the bills from coming out of committee hearings.
As of February 20, new federal government legislation is being proposed for mandatory adult vaccinations, including requiring mandatory retro-active shots. Public comment period regarding potential mandatory vaccination requirements is now open. Included in the legislation being considered is for mandatory vaccinations for all pregnant women as well as employer based vaccination programs along the guidelines of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). (Source)
Those opposed to mandatory vaccination laws by the Federal government have initiated a petition at the White House.gov website. Over 115,000 signatures have been gathered in less three days. (Source)
Additionally, some in mainstream media are calling for doctors to lose their licenses if they do not recommend vaccinations as well as parents being legally liable who choose not to vaccinate and even arrested.
Educating yourself as to what ingredients are in each type of vaccine recommended, potential risks and side effects associated with the different vaccines, the controversies surrounding whether to vaccinate or not, and whether the state and federal governments have the right and power to take away parents rights to choose exemption is the reason this site was created.
First, is the vaccine in question safe? Secondly, does it effectively prevent disease? And third, which vaccines can safely and effectively be given together or in close succession?
Primum non nocereo ~ First, Do No Harm
~ Oath Taken by All Health Practitioners ~
Non-maleficence, which is derived from the maxim, is one of the principal precepts of bioethics that all healthcare students are taught in school and is a fundamental principle throughout the world. Another way to state it is that, “given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good.”
It reminds the health care provider that they must consider the possible harm that any intervention might do. It is invoked when debating the use of an intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit.
From the American Medical Association
“The patient’s right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. Furthermore, the AMA says, the patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. “ “The physician’s obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient’s care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. “ (Source)
Legally, ethically, and morally the American Medical Association declares that parents should have properly informed consent before making medical decisions. Hopefully, this website helps the AV Community, all healthcare practitioner’s, parents and others get better informed and educated.
Currently the Center for Disease Control (CDC) is recommending 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6 and 69 doses by age 18. (Source)
Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines.
Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:
“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. ‘About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ‘Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.'”
Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven“there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”
UPDATE #1: Since coming forward with the truth about the devastating consequences of the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper has been victim of a relentless campaign attempting to discredit the validity of her claims. Harper was even misquoted by British tabloid The Sunday Expresswhich printed a false story loaded with fabricated quotations attributed to Harper. In an interview with The Guardian, Harper makes it very clear about what exactly she said in order to protect herself from a potential lawsuit. In an interview with CBS NEWS, Harper clarifies her position, and once again makes it crystal clear just how devastating this vaccine can be: “If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn’t last … we’ve put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit,” says Dr. Harper. “The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.” She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent. Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.
“The risks of serious adverse events including death reported after Gardasil use in (the JAMA article by CDC’s Dr. Barbara Slade) were 3.4/100,000 doses distributed,” Harper tells CBS NEWS. “The rate of serious adverse events on par with the death rate of cervical cancer. Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year. Indeed, the risks of vaccination are underreported in Slade’s article, as they are based on a denominator of doses distributed from Merck’s warehouse. Up to a third of those doses may be in refrigerators waiting to be dispensed as the autumn onslaught of vaccine messages is sent home to parents the first day of school. Should the denominator in Dr. Slade’s work be adjusted to account for this, and then divided by three for the number of women who would receive all three doses, the incidence rate of serious adverse events increases up to five fold. How does a parent value that information,” said Harper.
“Parents and women must know that deaths occurred,” Harper tells CBS NEWS. “Not all deaths that have been reported were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil.” She also worries that Merck’s aggressive marketing of the vaccine may have given women a false sense of security. “The future expectations women hold because they have received free doses of Gardasil purchased by philanthropic foundations, by public health agencies or covered by insurance is the true threat to cervical cancer in the future. Should women stop Pap screening after vaccination, the cervical cancer rate will actually increase per year. Should women believe this is preventive for all cancers — something never stated, but often inferred by many in the population — a reduction in all health care will compound our current health crisis. Should Gardasil not be effective for more than 15 years, the most costly public health experiment in cancer control will have failed miserably.” Harper notes that her concern for the vaccine’s deadly side effects applies only to women in the Western world. “Of course, in developing countries where there is no safety Pap screening for women repeatedly over their lifetimes, the risks of serious adverse events may be acceptable as the incidence rate of cervical cancer is five to 12 times higher than in the US, dwarfing the risk of death reported after Gardasil.”
UPDATE #2: THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER HAS CONFIRMED TWO VIROLOGISTS, STEPHEN KRAHLING AND JOAN WLOCHOWSKI HAVE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THEIR FORMER EMPLOYER AND VACCINE MANUFACTURER MERCK. NVIC WRITES: “THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THAT MERCK DEFRAUDED THE U.S. FOR OVER 10 YEARS BY OVERSTATING THE MMR VACCINE’S EFFECTIVENESS. THE VIROLOGISTS CLAIM IN THEIR LAWSUIT THAT THEY ‘WITNESSED FIRSTHAND THE IMPROPER TESTING AND DATA FALSIFICATION IN WHICH MERCK ENGAGED TO ARTIFICIALLY INFLATE THE VACCINE’S EFFICACY FINDINGS.” NVIC PRESIDENT AND CO-FOUNDER, BARBARA LOE FISHER, WARNS OF THE DISTURBINGLY COZY RELATIONSHIP AND OVERWHELMING CONFLICT OF INTEREST BETWEEN FEDERAL AGENCIES CHARGED WITH VACCINE SAFETY OVERSIGHT (SUCH AS THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL) AND VACCINE MANUFACTURERS. MERCK’S GLOBAL VACCINE SALES TOTAL MORE THAN $20 BILLION A YEAR.
As the world’s pharmaceutical giants continue to be driven less by moral accountability and more by profit and shareholder-driven bottom lines, we are going to see more and more products such as this vaccine which are marketed as “essential to one’s survival.” While some vaccines are indeed essential, such as vaccines for polio and measles, the HPV vaccine is a new beast entirely. To learn more about how pharmaceutical giants are putting profits ahead of ethics you need to watch FRONTLINE’s terrifying new documentary “Hunting The Nightmare Bacteria.”
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Post by Master Kim on Oct 22, 2015 22:02:30 GMT -5
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines - Movie - directed by Gary Null
Published on Oct 3, 2013
Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional medicine has herald the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are safe and effective, and that "herd immunity" can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However, does the science support these claims and what are the untold consequences?
Last Edit: Nov 1, 2015 16:23:46 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
A Texas family says their daughter, once full of life and very active, is now hospitalized in very bad shape due to a flu vaccine. The Browning family thinks their daughter suffered a rare side effect that has left her paralyzed from the waist down, with poor vision and incontinence.
9-year-old Brianna Browning remains in Pediatric ICU. Her family says she received a flu shot on Thursday October 15th 2015. They say the vaccine attacked her body to the point that she was transported by Ambulance to John Sealy Hospital in Galveston, Texas Saturday October 17th in critical condition. They say the reaction attacked 2 areas of her spinal cord, brain and neurological system. The family says doctors have not confirmed it happened from the vaccine but they are convinced. The family says Brianna will be in a very extensive rehabilitation program and doctors say she may not fully recover. They say Brianna remains positive and brave.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Autism - Made in the U S A - Gary Null's Remarkable Documentary
Published on Oct 16, 2013
In the USA, 1 in every 50 children is now autistic. In this award-winning documentary, investigative film maker Gary Null looks at the causes of the autism epidemic and reports on children's recovery from autism.
Post by Master Kim on Nov 10, 2015 15:32:16 GMT -5
How Vaccines Harm Child Brain Development - Dr Russell Blaylock MD
Published on Jun 12, 2013
If you are a parent of a baby or young children, expecting a baby or if you are a health professional you need to watch this lecture filmed at a Radio Liberty Seminar in October 2008 in which Russell Blaylock MD discusses the effect of vaccines on the developing brain and his concerns about the increasingly crowded infant vaccination schedule.
Dr Blaylock also provides compelling arguments why the vaccination of pregnant women is harmful and a hidden cause of neurological disorders. He also discusses the toxic ingredients in vaccines such as formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum and MSG and the detrimental effects they have on the brain and nervous system. He also touches on other vaccine-related topics, such as the conflicts of interests influencing vaccination policy due to the influence the pharmaceutical industry exerts on the government and the pharmaceutical industry, the polio epidemics in Africa, mercury toxicity and other medical scandals.
CDC officials claim vaccines are safe and effective. Is that true? If vaccines are safe, why has the incidence of autism increased from one case of autism in 10,000 to one case of autism in every 50 American children in the past few years, in parallel with a huge increase in the number of vaccines the government is promoting as part of the childhood vaccination schedule?
If childhood vaccines are safe, why are well over half a million vaccinated American children afflicted with autism, while non-vaccinated Amish and Mennonite children rarely suffer from the disorder? Why has the incidence of asthma, allergies, autoimmune disease, Type 1 diabetes and neurological conditions also dramatically increased in vaccinated children?
Furthermore, why do obstetricians give pregnant women influenza vaccines that contain a toxic dose of mercury and why are new babies injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine within hours of birth when there is no medical justification for it?
In this informative lecture, Dr Blaylock addresses these and many other vaccine-related issues. If you are concerned about your and your family's health and want to make an informed decision on behalf of your child or children, this is a really important video for you to watch. You will never look at vaccination and the so-called health care system the same way again.
If you live in the USA, to obtain a vaccine exemption ask the school office for an exemption form, fill it in and return it to be put on file. For further information for vaccine exemptions for birth or school click on this link and scroll down to your state: www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
As Bill Gates faces a lawsuit for the illegal testing of tribal children in India, it appears that his crimes against humanity have finally caught up with him.
A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.
Health Impact News stated:
“While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet.
One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.”
The Health Impact News article centered largely on a four-page report that was recently published by Economic Times India.
Eager to know more, I investigated their story and discovered that the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and two organizations funded by them, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), have found themselves under fire, after a writ of petition originally submitted to the Supreme Court of India, by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao in 2012, was finally heard by the courts.
The petitioners submitting the petition stated:
“BMGF, PATH and WHO were criminally negligent trialling the vaccines on a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population school administrators, students and their parents who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects or required to be monitored post-vaccination.”
Young Tribal Girls Tested With HPV Vaccines
The Economic Times India published their report August 2014. They stated that in 2009, tests had been carried out on 16,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh, India, using the human papiloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.
According to the report written by KP Narayana Kumar, within a month of receiving the vaccine, many of the children fell ill and by 2010, five of them had died. A further two children were reported to have died in Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 tribal children were vaccinated with another brand of the HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmitheKline (GSK).
Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally,” either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided, or using thumbprints from illiterate parents.
This travesty was not discovered until a team of health activists from the non-government organization SAMA, an organization specializing in women’s health, decided to investigate what had been going on.
According to the report, they were shocked to discover that a total of 120 girls had been taken ill, suffering from a variety of symptoms, including “epileptic seizures, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.”
The Economic Times stated:
“The Sama report also said there had been cases of early onset of menstruation following the vaccination, heavy bleeding and severe menstrual cramps among many students. The standing committee pulled up the relevant state governments for the shoddy investigation into these deaths.
It said it was disturbed to find that ‘all the seven deaths were summarily dismissed as unrelated to vaccinations without in-depth investigations …’ the speculative causes were suicides, accidental drowning in well (why not suicide?), malaria, viral infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage (without autopsy) etc.”
This information is even more shocking when you discover that the organization funding the study was none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who declared the project a total success.
“According to the BMGF, the WHO, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India have all recommended vaccination ‘as a proven and highly effective preventive measure for cervical cancer.’ The project used vaccines that are licensed in India and that have been administered safely around the world tens of millions of times, preventing countless cases of cervical cancer illness and death, ‘maintains a BMGF spokesperson in an emailed response (see GAVI & PHFI create incentives …’”
“BMGF’s role in funding the controversial studies, however, has led to many healthcare activists in India voicing their apprehensions. ‘BMGF has to take full responsibility because PATH is funded by them. It is also unethical when people championing the cause of vaccines are the same ones who are also investing in vaccine development,’ said V Rukmini Rao, one of the activists who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court in connection with the HPV vaccine studies.”
Absolutely, and this is not the first time that these organizations have been caught illegally testing vaccines in developing countries.
Gates Foundation, WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF Behind Chad Vaccine Disaster
In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.
These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.
Within hours, one hundred and six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.
When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.
The original report written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix, the only newspaper to have published the original story, stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.
After being shuttled around like cattle, many of these sick, weak children were finally dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.
However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?
The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.
VacTruth has copies of both reports, along with medical and government documents.
Despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success. To watch videos reporting the story, see the references at the end of this article.
The groups involved with this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation. During investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was being run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
In a press release, the Gates Foundation stated:
“MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines.
Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project, an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics.
We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.”
VacTruth can prove otherwise.
Government Inquiry Holds GAVI Accountable for Multiple Deaths
Despite the fact the Gates Foundation call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.
In 2011, the Express Tribune published a story stating that:
“ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.
The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.”
According to the Express Tribune, the main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavelent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.
The vaccines were funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) an organization financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank.
Writing on the official report, made exclusive to the newspaper, the Express Tribune stated:
“The report states, ‘The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.’”
If this is true, then once again the Gates Foundation has been linked to mass vaccination initiatives using untested, unsafe vaccinations.
The Gates Foundation and WHO Labeled Unethical by Medical Experts
In 2012, Ramesh Shankar Mumbai, an author writing for the Pharmabiz website, reported that two medical experts from India had accused the Gates Foundation and WHO of being unethical.
In his report, Mumbai stated that Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, wrote the following information in their report in the April issue of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.
“It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this program when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.”
Pharmabiz.com reported that Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel had continued their report by stating:
“Another major ethical issue raised by the campaign is the failure to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.”
“The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP ‘were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.’”
The corruption and deceit by these organizations does not stop there.
The Gates Foundation Blamed for 10,000 Vaccine-Related Deaths
In 2013, yet another report named the Gates Foundation and GAVI as being responsible for multiple deaths using untested vaccinations on children from the developing world.
The report, published on the website Occupy Corporatism and written by Susanne Posel stated:
“It was found out through an investigation, that GAVI was using an untested vaccine; giving this dangerous vaccine to Pakistani children shows the lack of empathy associated with these organizations. GAVI was blamed for the deaths of 10,000 children in Pakistan when they came in and administered polio vaccines that resulted in casualties.”
As we know, GAVI is heavily funded by the Gates Foundation.
So, what was the name of the organization that investigated GAVI and found them using untested polio vaccinations in Pakistan?
According to the Express Tribune article, which I referred to earlier in this article, it was none other than the Indian government, who, upon discovering the shocking truth, recommended the immediate suspension of the administration of all types of vaccines funded by GAVI.
In a recent radio show hosted by Sallie O. Elkordy, Susanne Posel gave her frank and honest views on the whole sorry mess that we find ourselves in today.
Warning: This report is not for the faint-hearted.
It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the Gates Foundation, GAVI, UNICEF and PATH, Bill Gates is portrayed as a hero among many.
However, according to the definition of hero in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means:
“A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.”
The dictionary I used said nothing about vaccinating innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Each year, tens of millions of American children are vaccinated according to the vaccination schedule set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The current CDC schedule recommends over 25 vaccines by the time a child reaches two years of age. The majority of the parents of these children follow the advice of their physicians and the CDC, which state that vaccines are both safe and effective and that, in order to protect hundreds of millions of individuals against disease, we must follow their recommendations.
Our medical authorities assure us that they would never allow our children to be exposed to something unproven or known to be dangerous. They claim that vaccines, even when multiple injections are given on a single day, are safe and do “not cause any chronic health problems.” Further, they claim that the ingredients contained in vaccines are either harmless or found in such miniscule quantities that they pose no health risks. The medical establishment also states unequivocally that there is no connection between vaccination and the rising incidence of autism spectrum disorder. Anyone who questions the safety of vaccination is immediately labeled as irresponsible or a quack who subscribes to pseudoscience.
Given that vaccines are mandatory for most children in public schools, it makes sense that they should be scientifically proven to be safe. However, in a careful analysis of thousands of articles in the peer-reviewed literature on toxicology and immunology, nowhere can we find evidence for these claims on vaccine safety are based upon a gold standard of clinical research: long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.
What is glaringly absent is research examining the cumulative toxicological impact of the CDC vaccine schedule over a long period of time. Never has a concise epidemiological study been published that compares the long-term health outcomes of a group of infants and children given the recommended CDC immunization schedule and a cohort of unvaccinated children. Since such research has never been carried out, our medical officials are relying on inconclusive research that is not science-based in order to create public health policy. American parents, meanwhile, are conditioned by our medical officials to bring their children in for regular vaccinations, confusing pure propaganda with scientific proof.
All humans possess a unique biochemistry that makes them more or less susceptible to various types of toxins. Whereas one child may be left with a compromised immune system after exposure to an environmental toxin, another child may experience learning problems or mild brain defects. Vaccine safety is not proved by stating the obvious – that not every child who receives the standard CDC vaccine schedule has autism. As we witness a rapidly increasing number of vaccinated children being afflicted by conditions such as autism, food allergies, encephalitis, type 1 diabetes, and Crohn’s disease, it’s critical that we investigate further the role played by environmental toxins to better understand their pathology. And when we look into the independent science on the safety of vaccines, it’s readily apparent that many of the ingredients found in vaccines are toxic, even in small amounts, and may contribute to a range of illnesses, including autism.
Here we will also take an uncompromising look at the institutions and individuals claiming that vaccines are safe for our children. We’ll find that just a brief review of our medical establishment reveals evidence of a corrupt network riddled with conflicts of interest and scandal, making it clear that we simply cannot trust our health officials on the issue of vaccine safety.
The Toxic Ingredients in Vaccines
What follows is an incomplete listing of scientific studies showing the dangers of common ingredients in vaccines. I am only citing a handful of examples from the scientific literature. Additional studies appear at the end of this document under “Supplementary Studies”.
Thimerosal is an ethyl mercury-containing compound that was, up until recently, widely used in vaccines as a preservative. More than 165 studies have found Thimerosal to be harmful to human health. Mercury exposure has been associated with nerve cell degeneration, adverse behavioral effects, and impaired brain development. It also has been linked to degenerative chronic conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. The developing fetal nervous system is the most sensitive to its toxic effects, and prenatal exposure to high doses of mercury has been shown to cause mental retardation and cerebral palsy.
Despite a preponderance of evidence showing Thimerosal’s toxicity, the CDC maintains its position that Thimerosal is generally safe in small doses, citing a handful of CDC-sponsored epidemiological studies. One study found evidence of significant “methodological issues and “malfeasance” in their reporting. Even though vaccine manufacturers have phased out the use of Thimerosal in most vaccines, some vaccines on the market today, including influenza, DTaP and DTaP-Hib, still contain Thimerosal.
In a 2010 study published in the journal Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, researchers at the University of Northern Iowa evaluated dozens of studies that claimed to refute the relationship between autism and exposure to toxic metals such as mercury, found in vaccines. The analysis uncovered that several of these studies used erroneous statistics and faulty methodologies to derive their conclusions and that in fact, evidence suggests that the vaccine-autism link should not be dismissed by the scientific community.
A 2004 study conducted by Northwestern University Pharmacy professor Richard Deth and researchers from the University of Nebraska, Tufts and Johns Hopkins University found that Thimerosal and other toxins contained in vaccines disrupt the biochemical process of methylation in the human body. Methylation plays a significant role in normal DNA function and neurological growth in infants and children. The group’s findings suggest that toxicants introduced through vaccinations contribute to conditions such as autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
The Thimerosal-autism connection is bolstered by the research of Dr. Boyd Haley, who served as the chairman of the University of Kentucky’s Department of Chemistry and spent three years as a NIH post-doctoral scholar at Yale University Medical School’s Department of Physiology. Haley’s research has identified mercury, even in minute amounts, to be a dangerous immunosuppressant that damages neurological function and is a major contributor to autism spectrum disorder. Dr. Haley’s scientific inquiries have provided strong evidence documenting how ethylmercury inhibits the process of phagocytosis (a critically important biological process of the human immune system), impairs the function of dendritic neurons in the brain and hinders the production of methyl B12. Each of these processes are significant factors in the onset of neurological illness.
In a study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health in July 2011, Australian authors David Austin and Kerrie Shandley surveyed a group of adults who were survivors of Pink Disease or Infantile Acrodynia, an ailment historically caused by exposure to mercury found in teething powder, diaper rinses and other materials. Since the survivors of Pink Disease were proven to be sensitive to mercury, the study set out to determine whether or not higher rates of autism were present among the survivors’ grandchildren. Austin and Shandley demonstrated that 1 in 25 of the survivors’ grandchildren had some form of autism spectrum disorder. The frequency of autism among children in the general population of Australia in the same age group as those surveyed is 1 in 160. The results unequivocally suggest that children with a family history of susceptibility to mercury poisoning are far more likely to develop autism.
Aluminum is an adjuvant, a chemical booster added to vaccines to induce an immune response. Most vaccines in the CDC schedule contain an aluminum compound. Furthermore, there is a large body of scientific research to support a connection between aluminum and neurotoxicity.
The alarming health consequences of aluminum were reported in a 2011 study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry led by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic at the University of British Columbia. The study revealed that rates of autism spectrum disorder among children are greater in countries where children are exposed to the highest amounts of aluminum in vaccines. The authors also noted “the increase in exposure to Al [aluminum] adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD [autism spectrum disorder] prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades”. An additional article by Dr. Tomljenovic, and published in a 2014 issue of the journal Immunotherapy, discussed the neurotoxic effects of aluminum on the central nervous system. The article mentions the role played by the metal in triggering autoimmune and inflammatory responses, altering genetic expression and contributing to neurodevelopmental disorders.
These findings are further supported by MIT researcher Dr. Stephanie Seneff. Seneff’s scientific investigation into the pathology of autism has turned up evidence that the neurotoxicity of aluminum is greatly increased when combined with glyphosate, Monsanto’s very widely used pesticide which is sprayed on crops around the world. Seneff posits that not only do these two agents combine to promote neurodevelopmental conditions but can also disrupt the gut’s microbiome, potentially leading to leaky gut syndrome, kidney failure, and other serious complications.
It is worth noting that the federal health agencies have admitted to the many dangers posed by aluminum exposure, such as the 357 page document titled “Toxicological Profile for Aluminum” released in 2008 by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The document, which was thoroughly vetted by CDC scientists, states:
There is a rather extensive database on the oral toxicity of aluminum in animals. These studies clearly identify the nervous system as the most sensitive target of aluminum toxicity and most of the animal studies have focused on neurotoxicity and neurodevelopmental toxicity.
Despite the government’s tacit recognition of aluminum’s health risks, the CDC and other federal agencies have made no effort to further investigate the cumulative toxicological impact of the current vaccine schedule.
Formaldehyde is a naturally occurring metabolite commonly added to bacterial and viral vaccines. According to the FDA “It is used to inactivate viruses so that they don’t cause disease (e.g., polio virus used to make polio vaccine) and to detoxify bacterial toxins, such as the toxin used to make diphtheria vaccine.” Though formaldehyde may neutralize potentially harmful pathogens in vaccines, the World Health Organization lists it as a “known human carcinogen.”
According to a report by the US’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), ingesting “formaldehyde can be fatal, and long-term exposure to low levels in the air or on the skin can cause asthma-like respiratory problems and skin irritation such as dermatitis and itching.” The report also cites formaldehyde as “a cancer hazard”. More evidence suggests formaldehyde exhibits neurotoxic properties as well.
The response from our health officials is that formaldehyde is contained in such small doses in vaccines that it doesn’t threaten human health. However, there is a conspicuous lack of research into the effects of formaldehyde exposure through multiple vaccines in pediatric populations. Given that infants and small children possess a much greater sensitivity to toxins compared to adults and that formaldehyde is introduced to children through immunizations containing a host of other toxic ingredients, it is crucial that we reevaluate its use in vaccines.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)
Monosodium glutamate, also known as MSG, has been used as a food additive for over a century, imparting a savory flavor that appeals to many people. It has also made its way into vaccines. Dr. Russell Blaylock notes that MSG is classified as an excitotoxin, or a compound which over stimulates cell receptors to such an extent that the cell ceases to function normally, resulting in damage to nerve cells and contributing to seizures.
Animal and Human DNA
Animal and even human tissues are used as a culture medium to grow the targeted virus or bacteria used in vaccines. Today, vaccine viruses are cultured in chicken fibroblast cells and embryos, chick retinal and kidney cells, monkey and dog kidney cells, aborted human fetal lung fibroblast cells and mouse brain tissue, to name a few. In 2013, the FDA approved the use of insect cells instead of chicken eggs for the influenza vaccine.
Unfortunately, viral filtration of the substrate that will be used in the vaccine is a primitive manufacturing process. A significant amount of foreign DNA and genetic debris from the culture finds its way into the vaccine that is eventually administered to children. DNA fragments can recombine with our body’s host cells thereby triggering undesirable autoimmune reactions. Considering the exponential increase in autoimmune diseases over the past 25 years, it is reasonable to suspect that the large amount of foreign genetic debris injected into our bodies is wreaking havoc with natural immune functions. There are also instances of certain vaccines causing a specific autoimmune response, such as a Haemophilus influenza B vaccine and type 1 diabetes association, and a Hepatitis B-Multiple Sclerosis relationship, which were observed after widespread administration of these vaccines.
Polysorbate 80 is a chemical agent used as an emulsifier in vaccines. Research suggests that exposure to polysorbate 80 can “cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.” Another study found a connection between this substance and Crohn’s disease.
A type of detergent used in some flu vaccines, Triton X-100 has been found to promote cell death and cause intestinal damage in animal studies.
Phenol is a type of preservative commonly used in vaccines. A study looking into the viability of preservatives in vaccines noted that phenol, like Thimerosal, is neurotoxic. The authors suggested that “(f)uture formulations of US-licensed vaccines/biologics should be produced in aseptic manufacturing plants as single dose preparations, eliminating the need for preservatives and an unnecessary risk to patients.”
The compound known as 2-Phenoxyethoanol is commonly used as an antibacterial agent in vaccines. Among its known . Reports link this chemical to kidney, liver, and neurological toxicity.
Real Science Indicting Vaccines and How it Has Been Suppressed
If good quality science exists that could discredit the pro-vaccine argument that there is no connection to autism, it is completely understandable that the media and the government and industry and scientists for hire continue their unrelenting attack on independent scientists, physicians, and most importantly, upon the victims themselves. To acknowledge that the entire vaccine program is unsupported by gold standard science would mean massive lawsuits, congressional investigations and discrediting the CDC, the FDA, US public health services and pharmaceutical companies. In effect, this could be the largest public health scandal in American history, and the public would be very unforgiving. Let’s now take a look at more damning evidence linking vaccines with autism and neurodevelopmental disease and the systemic suppression of this evidence.
1. Scientists at the University of Pittsburgh investigated the effects of vaccination on the neurodevelopment of baby macaque monkeys. The monkeys were given a course of vaccinations typical of the 1990s vaccine schedule. In comparison with the control group, vaccinated monkeys displayed abnormal patterns of brain growth and dysfunction of the amygdala – both strong indicators of autism when they appear in children.
2. In 2002, the Journal of Biomedical Science published research carried out by scientists at Utah State University’s Department of Biology analyzing the effects of the MMR vaccine on the central nervous system. In their evaluation, the group discovered that autistic children who receive the MMR possess a higher titer of certain antibody related to measles. These antibodies trigger an abnormal autoimmune response that effectively damages the brain’s myelin sheath. Evidence suggests that such damage to the myelin sheath may impair normal brain activities and cause autism.
3. The University of California San Diego and San Diego State University published a study showing a higher incidence of autism among children who were given the MMR vaccine and subsequently took acetaminophen or Tylenol. Their findings were published in the medical journal Autism.
4. Through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a federal program charged with the responsibility of financially compensating families of individuals injured or killed by vaccines, the US government has all but admitted to the connection between vaccines, neurological disorders and autism. A detailed research study appearing in the Pace Environmental Law Review in March 2011 revealed that the VICP has been quietly compensating 83 families for cases of vaccine-induced encephalopathy and residual seizure disorder associated with autism. In 21 of these cases, the word “autism” is actually used in court documents to describe the injuries that resulted from vaccination. The obvious conclusion is that, in paying these claims, the government has implicitly acknowledged a link between vaccination and autism.
5. A recent report from the Department of Justice showed that within a three month period from November 2014- February 2015, 117 vaccine-induced injuries and deaths were compensated by VICP. The majority of the injuries listed in the report were caused by the flu vaccine and the most common injury linked to the flu vaccine was Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an uncommon illness in which the immune system attacks and damages the body’s neurons, sometimes resulting in permanent nerve damage or even death.
Why Our Health Officials Can’t Be Trusted
Research indicates that conflicts of interest abound in the vaccine industry, making it difficult to have faith in our health authorities. Worse still, evidence points to pervasive corruption among high profile individuals and institutions in the medical-industrial complex. Here we will look at some of the most alarming examples.
In June 2000, a group of top federal scientists, health officials, the CDC, the FDA, the British Health ministry and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry gathered for a secret meeting convened by the CDC at the Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia. Officially titled the Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information, the Simpsonwood conference reviewed the findings of a large epidemiological study evaluating any relationship between Thimerosal and autism. The meeting was not open to the public and was subject to a complete news embargo. Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a transcript of the meeting became available.
The transcript revealed how health officials engaged in a cold-blooded cover-up of scientific evidence linking Thimerosal use in vaccine with a large spike in autism rates and other neurological illnesses. The director of the Datalink study, CDC epidemiologist Dr. Tom Verstraeten, was quoted as saying, “I was actually stunned by what I saw,” citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between Thimerosal and speech delays, attention deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. According to the transcript, Dr. John Clements, then the vaccines advisor at the World Health Organization, stated in the that “perhaps this study should not have been done at all.” RFK Jr. recounted in an article the lengths to which our medical establishment went prevent the scientific findings from reaching the public sphere:
The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash the risks of thimerosal, ordering researchers to “rule out” the chemical’s link to autism. It withheld Verstraeten’s findings, even though they had been slated for immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been “lost” and could not be replicated. And to thwart the Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to researchers. By the time Verstraeten finally published his study in 2003, he had gone to work for GlaxoSmithKline and reworked his data to bury the link between thimerosal and autism.
Gerberding: The Vaccine Insider
There is a revolving door between the vaccine manufacturers and those in government who are responsible for overseeing these manufacturers. A prime example is former CDC director Dr. Julie Gerberding, who left the agency in 2010 to take a position with pharmaceutical giant Merck as the President of the company’s vaccine division. Gerberding stated in an interview that she is “very bullish on vaccines”. Her admission is especially disconcerting given her long history of siding with vaccine makers. While in her position at the CDC, the organization was found to be massively exaggerating the threat of the H1N1 swine flu, and pushing largely unproven vaccines on the American public with dangerous side effects.
Despite her clear alliance with Big Pharma, Dr. Julie Gerberding strongly implied a vaccine-autism link during a 2008 interview with CNN’s Sanjay Gupta while serving as the CDC’s director. Gerberding stated:
Well, you know, I don’t have all the facts because I still haven’t been able to review the case files myself. But my understanding is that the child has a — what we think is a rare mitochondrial disorder. And children that have this disease, anything that stresses them creates a situation where their cells just can’t make enough energy to keep their brains functioning normally. Now, we all know that vaccines can occasionally cause fevers in kids. So if a child was immunized, got a fever, had other complications from the vaccines. And if you’re predisposed with the mitochondrial disorder, it can certainly set off some damage. Some of the symptoms can be symptoms that have characteristics of autism.
Thorsen: A Case of Corruption
A prime example of the corruption within the CDC around vaccine safety is the case of Dr. Poul Thorsen, a Danish researcher who coauthored 36 CDC studies, two of which are widely cited studies claiming to disprove an autism-vaccine link. From 2004 to 2010 Thorsen allegedly laundered more than $1 million in grant money allocated for research and used the funds to make personal purchases, including a home in Atlanta. Thorsen is currently in Denmark awaiting extradition to the United States.
In a recent editorial, Robert F. Kennedy called into question the slow nature of US authorities in apprehending Thorsen stating that:
The fact that he is roaming free and is easy to find, despite the US Federal indictment, does not imply Thorsen’s innocence… Rather it suggests a lack of enthusiasm by HHS and CDC to press for his capture and extradition. The agency undoubtedly fears that a public trial would expose the pervasive corruption throughout CDC’s vaccine division and the fragility of the science supporting CDC’s claims about Thimerosal safety.
The two autism-vaccine studies undertaken by Thorsen and his team have been decried by critics as scientific fraud. According to leaked CDC documents, the data from one of the studies, which monitored rates of autism in Denmark after a country-wide phase out of Thimerosal, were heavily manipulated to make it appear that autism rates increased its removal from vaccines, when in fact rates decreased. The research’s methodology was so unscientific that journals such as The Lancet and The Journal of the American Medical Association rejected publishing the study, and it wasn’t until a CDC director wrote a strongly-worded letter to staff at the journal Pediatrics, that the research was actually published.
The other autism-vaccine study coauthored by Thorsen, which seemingly debunked an autism link to the MMR vaccine was published in 2002. In his aforementioned editorial, Robert Kennedy Jr. wrote about the study’s questionable methodology:
That study employed CDC’s trademark ruse of including many children who were too young to receive the autism diagnosis, which at that point usually occurred at age four. CDC epidemiologists have consistently used this ploy in their phony autism studies to dampen the autism signal and exonerate the vaccine.The 2002 Madsen et al. MMR study also included a substantial number of unvaccinated children and employed a suite of other statistical gimmicks to mask the association with the MMR vaccine.
The Thompson Revelation
In 2014, a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. William Thompson, went public with claims that he and his colleagues willfully omitted data from a study that supported a link between vaccines and autism. After discovering a connection between the MMR vaccine and an increased risk of autism among African American males under 36 months of age, Thompson claims that he and his fellow authors chose to exclude these data and effectively perpetrated scientific fraud by publishing research which contradicted their actual research conclusions. Commenting on how he and his colleagues misrepresented their findings, Thompson stated that:
…we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.
In 2015, Representative Bill Posey entered a statement by Thompson about the cover-up into the Congressional record.
In an interview last year, Congressman Posey commented on the “intentionally evasive” behavior of CDC spokesperson on vaccines and autism, Dr. Colleen Boyle while he questioned saying:
I asked her a very direct question. ‘Have you done a study comparing autism rates in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children?…’ She started telling us about everything she’s done …After she wasted three minutes, I cut her off and I demanded that she answer the question. And then, only then, did she admit that the federal government has never done that very simple, fundamental, basic study.
In light of the growing evidence of corruption and fraud within the CDC, Representative Bill Posey has called for an investigation of the CDC on the issue of vaccine science.
Reevaluating the Vaccine Safety Paradigm
Even a cursory review of the independent scientific literature on the safety of vaccines and their ingredients demonstrates clearly that our national policies on immunization are deeply flawed.
No amount of propaganda can change the fact that vaccines introduce a toxic load to the human body that can cause a wide range of harmful side effects including neurological disease. The failure of our health authorities to undertake independent, gold standard research examining the long-term effects of the CDC vaccine schedule demonstrates the extent to which our medical halls of power are plagued by depraved special interests. We must refuse to participate in this risky game which forces toxic vaccines on our children and we must demand an end to the medical fascism behind it.
Last Edit: Dec 1, 2015 19:35:19 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Monday, July 27, 2015 by: Julie Wilson staff writer
(NaturalNews) One of the world's most lucrative industries, spending on cancer drugs reached an all-time high last year, as it was valued at more than $100 billion. Spending on cancer drugs increased 6.5 percent annually over the past five years and is expected to continue growing at a rate of 8 percent each year through 2018, according to figures provided by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.
That spending is highly concentrated, as the US and five of Europe's largest countries account for nearly two-thirds of the entire market.
This means that billions and billions of dollars are secured by Americans being diagnosed with cancer.
That's one profitable industry; however, it could all be completely dismantled by one thing: a cure.
As Mike Adams recently reported, "A universal cancer cure would destroy the profitability of the highly lucrative cancer industry and collapse the American Cancer Society, hospitals, oncology clinics and pharmaceutical companies that depend on chemotherapy revenues to stay profitable."
This means that anyone moving closer to developing a cure for cancer would be considered an extreme threat to the medical establishment and likely stopped at any cost.
With that in mind, the mysterious deaths and disappearances of several natural health doctors throughout Florida is as suspicious as it is concerning.
If anyone was close to finding a universal cure for cancer and would ensure the public had access to it, it would likely be natural health doctors, or naturopaths, as they're less likely to prescribe drugs and more likely to try and heal the body naturally using holistic medicine and nontoxic approaches.
Breakthroughs using this type of medicine are extremely "controversial," as they threaten everything that the medical-industrial complex stands for, i.e. costly chemotherapy treatments and cancer drugs.
Doctors leading this type of research are routinely raided and shut down by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), after which they're treated like criminals and their reputations smeared.
This is typically orchestrated against doctors who are considered a threat by the medical establishment.
Renown holistic doctor found dead one week after FDA raids clinic
This seems to be the case with Dr. James Jeffrey Bradstreet, who was recently found dead after his body was discovered floating in a North Carolina river with a single gunshot wound to the chest. Bradstreet, a renowned physician known for his skepticism of immunizations (particularly the MMR vaccine), and his progressive autism research, was raided by the FDA one week before his mysterious death. The details of the raid remain largely unknown.
Personally affected by autism, as both his son and stepson were diagnosed with the condition, a significant portion of Dr. Bradstreet's work was dedicated to this cause. He even testified twice before the U.S House of Representatives about the link between vaccines and autism.
As Natural News' reported, leading up to his death, Dr. Bradstreet was working with a little-known molecule that occurs naturally in the human body. GcMAF (Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor), which is the GC protein after it combines with vitamin D in the body, has the potential to be a universal cure for cancer.
It's also believed to be capable of treating and reversing autism, HIV, liver/kidney disease and diabetes.
Dr. Bradstreet was working with a naturally occurring compound that may be the single most effective thing in the immune system for killing cancer cells
In an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Dr. Ted Broer, an internationally recognized health and nutrition expert also based in Florida, describes how cutting edge Dr. Bradstreet's work was, as well as a discovery he made that very well may have placed him in great danger and could have been the motive for his suspected murder.
The alternative doctors who went missing and/or were killed, were reportedly "interlocked" through Dr. Bradstreet and Dr. Gonzalez's extensive research on autism, and what's causing autism, according to Dr. Broer.
Dr. Gonzalez, a renown holistic cancer treatment pioneer who helped thousands overcome the disease through alternative medicine, died of an apparent heart attack just one month after Dr. Bradstreet's body was discovered floating in a river.
Internationally recognized health and nutrition doctor reveals possible motive for Bradstreet's death
Dr. Broer stated in the interview:
This information I'm about to give you right now is extremely controversial and a bunch of people have exited the planet who were working with it.
This information has been around for awhile. They knew the information they were working with and they were basically being very, very careful, supposedly. And some of them were being accused of using GcMAF, and the FDA apparently raided several of their offices several weeks before they committed suicide or suddenly died.
It's going to sound complicated, but I'm going to break this down for everybody super, super easy tonight. When you first hear these terms they're going to sound weird to you.
GC protein is a protein in the body that's used by macrophages in the body. What it does is, macrophages in the body are the ones that kill cancer cells, they stop cytokines storms and can be involved in cytokines storms, we'll explain all these terms in a few minutes.
After defining GcMAF and how it's formulated, Dr. Broer reiterates that it's "probably the single most effective thing in the immune system to kill cancer cells."
However, what Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues discovered is that the immune system is being compromised by a compound called "nagalase."
Nagalase is an enzyme/protein that's made by cancer cells and viruses causing immunodeficiency syndromes and has also been linked to autism as well as a "host of other problems," Dr. Broer explains.
Doctors found dead and/or went missing felt that nagalase was being introduced to the body through vaccines
"What ends up happening is when the GC protein cannot be converted to McGAF, the entire immune system is compromised."
Some of the doctors who wound up dead or missing believed that the nagalase protein/enzyme was being introduced intentionally into the body either virally or directly through vaccines.
"This is such incredibly damning information to the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and those folks that [sic] are producing immunizations, that apparently they didn't want these guys around," Dr. Broer said.
"I'm not saying what happened to these guys, I'm just saying they're not on this planet anymore." Doctor compares cancer-causing nagalase to stealth bomber
Nagalese blocks the GC protein from attaching itself to vitamin D, thus preventing the immune system from doing its job and therefore causing cancer and other serious diseases. Without an active immune system, cancer and viral infections can spread rapidly.
Remarkably, there's a significant amount of research available on nagalase and the GcMAF protein. Citing a chapter from The GcMAF Book by Dr. Tim Smith, MD, Dr. Broer said:
Nagalase is like a stealth bomber, the nagalase enzyme synthesized in or released from cancer cells or a virus particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes and simply wipes them out with an incredibly precise bomb.
How precise? Nagalase locates and attacks one specific two-electron bond located only at the 420th amino acid position on a huge protein molecule, one of tens of thousands of proteins, each containing millions of electrons.
This is like selectively taking out a park bench in a major city from 6,000 miles away. More astonishingly, if that is possible, nagalase never misses its target, so there is no collateral damage. Nagalase is being found in super high concentrations in autistic children
Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues also learned that the nagalase protein was not present in children at birth but was somehow introduced into autistic children, they felt, during the immunization process.
Before his death, Dr. Bradstreet treated 1,100 patients with GcMAF with an 85 percent response rate – something that was deemed impossible by the medical community.
After reintroducing GcMAF (which had been blocked by nagalase), 15 percent of Bradstreet's autistic patients were no longer autistic, as all of their symptoms were completely eradicated.
Since 1990, 59 research papers have been published on the healing effects of GcMAF, 20 of which pertain to the treatment of cancer. Research suggests that GcMAF can also cure or effectively treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as reduce cancerous breast, prostrate and kidney tumors.
Stay tuned as Natural News continues to uncover more on this investigation.
Assuming this Bill is rammed through the Senate & Health Committee which seems inevitable the public must be alerted immediately to the serious risks associated with this vaccine. If New York buckles under pressure then other States & countries around the world are sure to follow. There are 3 Meningitis Vaccines being promoted by the WHO & CDC for distribution in this campaign including:
1) MENACTRA (Manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur Inc.)
Menactra-300x300Menactra®, Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, is a sterile, intramuscularly administered vaccine that contains Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A, C, Y and W-135 capsular polysaccharide antigens individually conjugated to diphtheria toxoid protein. N meningitidis A, C, Y and W-135 strains are cultured on Mueller Hinton agar (1) and grown in Watson Scherp(2) media. The polysaccharides are extracted from the N meningitidis cells and purified by centrifugation, detergent precipitation, alcohol precipitation, solvent extraction and diafiltration. To prepare the polysaccharides for conjugation, they are depolymerized, derivatized, and purified by diafiltration. Corynebacterium diphtheriae cultures are grown in a modified Mueller and Miller medium (3) and detoxified with formaldehyde. The diphtheria toxoid protein is purified by ammonium sulfate fractionation and diafiltration. www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM131170.pdf
Package Insert: General Warnings –
NURSING MOTHERS: It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Menactra vaccine is administered to a nursing woman.
PEDIATRIC USE: Safety and effectiveness of Menactra vaccine in children below the age of 2 years have not been established.
GERIATRIC USE: Safety and effectiveness of Menactra vaccine in adults older than 55 years have not been established
CARCINOGENESIS, MUTAGENESIS – IMPAIRMENT OF FERTILITY: Menactra vaccine has not been evaluated in animals for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or for impairment of fertility.
CONTRAINDICATIONS: Known hypersensitivity to any component of Menactra vaccine including diphtheria toxoid, or a life-threatening reaction after previous administration of a vaccine containing similar components, are contraindications to vaccine administration.
GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME: Guillain-Barré syndrome has been reported in temporal relationship following administration of Menactra vaccine. An evaluation of post-marketing adverse events suggests a potential for an increased risk of GBS following Menactra vaccination. Persons previously diagnosed with GBS should not receive Menactra vaccine.
LATEX: The stopper of the vial contains dry natural rubber latex, which may cause allergic reactions in latex-sensitive individuals. There is no latex in any component of the syringe.
2) MENOMUNE (Manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur Inc.)
Menomune® – A/C/Y/W-135, Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Groups A, C, Y and W-135 Combined, for subcutaneous use, is a freeze-dried preparation of the group-specific polysaccharide antigens from Neisseria meningitidis, Group A, Group C, Group Y and Group W-135. N meningitidis are cultivated with Mueller Hinton agar1 and Watson Scherp2 media. The purified polysaccharide is extracted from the Neisseria meningitidis cells and separated from the media by procedures which include centrifugation, detergent precipitation, alcohol precipitation, solvent or organic extraction and diafiltration. www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM131653.pdf
Package Insert: General Warnings –
IT IS A CONTRAINDICATION TO ADMINISTER MENOMUNE – A/C/Y/W-135 VACCINE TO INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO BE SENSITIVE TO THIMEROSAL OR ANY OTHER COMPONENT OF THE VACCINE.
FOR INDIVIDUALS SENSITIVE TO THIMEROSAL, ADMINISTER THE ONE DOSE PACKAGE SIZE AND RECONSTITUTE WITH THE 0.78 ML VIAL OF DILUENT THAT CONTAINS NO PRESERVATIVE.
WARNING: This product contains dry natural latex rubber as follows: The stopper to the vial contains dry natural latex rubber.
If the vaccine is used in persons receiving immunosuppressive therapy, the expected immune response may not be obtained.
VACCINE INTERACTIONS – Menomune should NOT be given at the same time as whole-cell pertussis or whole-cell typhoid vaccines due to combined endotoxin content.20,21
PRECAUTIONS: EPINEPHRINE INJECTION (1:1000) MUST BE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO COMBAT UNEXPECTED ANAPHYLACTIC OR OTHER ALLERGIC REACTIONS.
DRUG INTERACTIONS: If Menomune – A/C/Y/W-135 vaccine is administered to immunosuppressed persons or persons receiving immunosuppressive therapy, an adequate immunologic response may not be obtained.
CARCINOGENESIS, MUTAGENESIS, IMPAIRMENT OF FERTILITY: Menomune – A/C/Y/W-135 vaccine has not been evaluated in animals for its carcinogenic, mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.
PREGNANCY CATEGORY C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Groups A, C, Y and W-135. It is also not known whether Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Groups A, C, Y and W-135 can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Groups A, C, Y and W-135 should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.
NURSING MOTHERS: It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Menomune – A/C/Y/W-135 vaccine is administered to a nursing woman.
PEDIATRIC USE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MENOMUNE – A/C/Y/W-135 VACCINE IN CHILDREN BELOW THE AGE OF 2 YEARS HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED.
3) MENVEO (Manufatured by Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc.)
Menveo® [Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135) Oligosaccharide Diphtheria CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine] is a sterile liquid vaccine administered by intramuscular injection that contains N. meningitidis serogroup A, C, Y and W-135 oligosaccharides conjugated individually to Corynebacterium diphtheriae CRM197 protein. The polysaccharides are produced by bacterial fermentation of N. meningitidis (serogroups A, C, Y or W-135). N. meningitidis strains A, C, Y and W-135 are each cultured and grown on Franz Complete medium and treated with formaldehyde. MenA, MenW-135 and MenY polysaccharides are purified by several extraction and precipitation steps. MenC polysaccharide is purified by a combination of chromatography and precipitation steps. The protein carrier (CRM197) is produced by bacterial fermentation and is purified by a series of chromatography and ultrafiltration steps. C. diphtheriae is cultured and grown on CY medium containing yeast extracts and amino acids. www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM201349.pdf
*NOTE: C. diphtheriae is cultured and grown on CY medium containing yeast extracts refers to genetically modified yeast. Anyone with an allergy to gluten will be adversely affected by this process.
Package Insert: General Warnings –
PRECAUTIONS: Management of Acute Allergic Reactions Appropriate medical treatment must be available should an acute allergic reaction, including an anaphylactic reaction, occur following administration of MENVEO.
SYNCOPE: Because vaccinees may develop syncope, sometimes resulting in falling with injury, observation for 15 minutes after administration is recommended. Syncope, sometimes associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity, has been reported following vaccination with MENVEO. When syncope is associated with tonic-clonic movements, the activity is usually transient and typically responds to restoring cerebral perfusion by maintaining a supine or Trendelenburg position.
Altered Immunocompetence Safety and effectiveness of MENVEO have not been evaluated in immunocompromised persons. If MENVEO is administered to immunocompromised persons, including those receiving immunosuppressive therapy, the expected immune response may not be obtained.
GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME: Following vaccination with a U.S.-licensed meningococcal quadrivalent polysaccharide conjugate vaccine, an evaluation of post-marketing adverse events suggested a potential for an increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Data are not available to evaluate the potential risk of GBS following administration of MENVEO.
BLEEDING DISORDERS: MENVEO should not be administered to persons with any bleeding disorder, or persons receiving anticoagulant therapy, unless the potential benefit outweighs the risk of administration.
MENINGITIS: THE FACTS – These days, when a vaccinee develops poliomyelitis, it may not be called poliomyelitis; instead, it may be called viral or aseptic meningitis, ascending paralysis (Guillain-Barre syndrome), cerebral palsy (over 75 per cent of cases are not diagnosed at birth but after six months) or other such names. According to MMWR (1997; 32:384-385), there are 30,000 to 50,000 cases of aseptic meningitis every year in the United States. Considering that the vast majority (99 per cent) of the reported cases in the pre-vaccine era were non-paralytic and would have corresponded to aseptic or aviral meningitis, then vaccination has actually increased the incidence of poliomyelitis. In the pre-vaccine era, such high numbers only occurred in some epidemics. Now, such numbers occur every year, year by year. www.whale.to/vaccines/meningitis2.htm
The Department of Health has refused to carry out a review into the safety of the meningitis C vaccine despite fears it is unsafe. New figures show that almost 5,000 children have suffered adverse reactions to the vaccine since it was introduced. The Chiron jab was introduced in June of 2000, a year ahead of schedule, as a protection against the meningitis C strain. It has been given to 13m children and university students across the UK. But according to figures from the Medical Controls Agency there were 4,764 reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine up to the beginning of June. A further 10,202 suspected reactions have been reported while an investigation has been launched into the deaths of eight children to see if there is a link to the vaccine. www.nccn.net/~wwithin/meningitisc.htm
VRM Live – 09/24/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement Founder Joel Lord & activist/radio host Jesse Calhoun lay it all out tonite. Topics include the VRM Worldwide Autism Study, Scientific/Medical dictatorship, Natural Rights & Vaccine Industry fraud exposed. Special thanks to host Paul Mabelis. www.blogtalkradio.com/empradio/2010/09/24/truth-to-power-thursday
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
PANEL DISCUSSION Saturday Day Pass Required Saturday, February 20th 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm Room: Plaza Ballroom
In this investigative and information dissecting panel, the truth about vaccines will be explored, outlaying the pros and cons of the state of vaccines today. The Vaccine issue has become a convoluted war fueled by propaganda, big pharma and an ever increasing police state where vaccinations are mandatory and public safety or contraindications are secondary to the mass demand for inoculations. Our panel of insiders and experts share what’s really happening inside the CDC and how public health, the pharmaceutical profit machine and propaganda are colliding when it comes to vaccines and patient safety.
If you are confused about vaccines, the mandatory passing of SB277 in California and worried about your health freedom, don’t miss this provocative, informative discussion. In this investigative and information dissecting panel, the truth about vaccines will be explored, outlaying the pros and cons of the state of vaccines today.
Moderator - Kelly Gallagher Kelly Gallagher is an award winning documentary filmmaker and founder of Green My Vaccines.org. As a 5x cancer thriver, Kelly, is a bionic force tackling causes from cancer to mercury toxicity to vaccine choice. After years battling health challenges, she woke up to her true purpose and passion shifting paradigms and changing thought via cause marketing and documentaries that matter. www.jamminplanet.com
Dr. Andrew Wakefield M.D. A highly acclaimed gastroenterologist physician who publicly connected the possible link between the MMR vaccine and autism in 1998. As co-founder of the Autism Media Channel, Dr. Wakefield continues to publicly campaign for the rights of the skyrocketing number of families with vaccine injured children and advocates safe vaccines. He is director of the Autism Media Channel.
WENDY SILVERS Wendy is founder/CEO of the Million Mamas Movement.. Wendy traveled 5 times to the SB277 hearings at Sacramento in 2015, met with legislators and speaks widely on education and advocacy for safe vaccines. Her father contracted Bell’s Palsy after receiving the flu shot. She co-organized and emceed the SB277 Health Freedom Rally in Santa Monica in 2015.. www.millionmamasmovement.org
LARRY COOK Larry created his website in response to CA SB277, a law that mandates vaccination for children who attend school. He continually raises public awareness about the dangers of vaccination and why natural immunity is superior to vaccination through his TV commercials, parent interviews, photographic memes, website and ongoing Facebook posts. www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com
ALLISON JONES Allison educates audiences on how vaccines are made and causal relationship to Autism, SIDS and allergies and the varying natures of viruses and bacteria through tracking vaccinations.com. Her mission is to translate complicated vaccine science into simple understanding. Visit: www.trackingvaccinations.com
KAREN KAIN Karen is a highly respected parent advocate for Autistic families and author of “A Unique Life Fully Lived” - an empowering memoir about raising Lorrin, her vaccine injured daughter for fifteen years who was rendered blind, deaf, non-verbal and quadriplegic, an hour after receiving her first DPT vaccine at six weeks old and suffered seizures every day of her life. Karen speaks at conferences around the country encouraging families how to joyfully raise their special needs children. Visit: www.karenkain.com
DR. TONI BARK is a Pediatrician physician with degrees in nutrition and homeopathy and speaks widely on vaccine safety, efficacy and ethics issues. She recently published an article about the lack of scientific evidence for mandated flu vaccines for health care workers. Dr. Bark was in a featured story in O magazine in 2012 and is co-producer of the documentary, “Bought”.
BRANDY VAUGHAN Former Merck pharmaceutical sales rep, Brandy founded the Council for Vaccine Safety in response to the industry's unprecedented push to eliminate medical choice with regards to vaccines. She recently launched the Learn the Risk campaign using billboards and other media to raise public awareness of vaccine risks. She is the mother of a healthy, vaccine-free 4 year old. www.LearntheRisk.org
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
11 Reasons Why The Flu Shot Is More Dangerous Than The Flu
The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself.
Every year the pharmaceutical industry, medical experts and the mainstream media work hard to convince us to get vaccinated against the flu. But we’re not being told the whole story. What we don’t hear, are cases about the adverse reactions or about the toxic chemicals being injected into us.
1. Lack of real evidence that young children even benefit from flu shots
51 studies involving 260,000 children age 6 to 23 months established no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo. Additionally, flu shots only protect against certain strains of the virus meaning that you can still easily get the flu if you come into contact with a different strain of virus.
2. Flu vaccines contain other dangerous ingredients such as mercury
The pharmaceutical industry, medical experts and the mainstream media are candid in telling us that flu vaccines contain strains of the flu virus. What they are less likely to reveal though is the long list of other ingredients that come with the vaccine. It is now a known fact that flu vaccines contain mercury, a heavy metal known to be hazardous for human health. Mercury toxicity can cause depression, memory loss, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory problems, ADD, oral health problems, digestive imbalances and other serious health issues.
3. The flu shot can cause Alzheimer’s disease
Evidence now suggests that flu vaccines can cause Alzheimer’s disease. Research conducted by Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, a leading immunogeneticist, shows that those who consistently get the flu vaccine increase their risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 10 fold. He believes this is due to the toxic combination of aluminum and mercury in the vaccine. Additionally, introducing the flu virus to an elderly person (who with age will naturally have a weaker immune system) will only increase the chances of that individual becoming susceptible to more serious illness.
4. The very people pushing flu vaccinations are making billions of dollars each year
In August 1999, the Committee on Government Reform initiated an investigation into Federal vaccine policy. This investigation focused on possible conflicts of interest on the part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The investigation concluded that many individuals serving on two key advisory committees had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines. Often, these individuals were granted waivers to fully participate in the discussions that led to recommendations on vaccine licensing and adding vaccines to the Childhood Immunization Schedule. This in itself creates serious doubt as to how effective flu vaccines really are.
5. The flu vaccines actually do not immunize but sensitize the body against the virus
Have you ever noticed how vaccinated children get sick almost immediately following a vaccination? This is because the flu virus is introduced into their bodies. So rather than immunize, the flu shot actually only sensitizes the body against the virus. And the fact that it causes individuals to get ill following a shot indicates immuno-suppression (i.e. lowering of the immunity).
6. Makes you more susceptible to pneumonia and other contagious diseases
For someone with an already suppressed immune system, injecting strains of the flu virus can have devastating consequences. If your body is already working to fight off a virus or simply operating with low immunity, a vaccine injection could put your body in serious danger of contracting influenza with stronger symptoms, or even worse pneumonia and other contagious diseases.
7. Vascular disorders
Medical research shows flu shots are associated with an increased risk of vascular inflammation. Symptoms include fever, jaw pain, muscle aches, pain and stiffness in the neck, upper arms, shoulder and hips and headache.
8. Children under the age of 1 are at risk
Children under 1 years of age are highly vulnerable to a neurotoxic breach of the delicate nerve center surrounding the brain and central nervous system. The first round of the flu vaccine is administered at age 6 months. A child under the age of 1 lacks sufficient protection to guard against premature damage to the blood barrier in the brain.
9. Increased risk of narcolepsy
There have been dozens of reported cases of children in 12 different countries who have developed narcolepsy (a chronic sleep disorder) after receiving the flu vaccine. The study, which took place between October 2009 and the December 2011, compared 3.3 million vaccinated Swedes with 2.5 million who were not vaccinated. The risk was found to be highest among the youngest people who took the vaccines. For those under the age of 21, the risk of contracting narcolepsy was three times higher.
10. Weakens immunological responses
There have been literally thousands of medical journal articles published that show injecting vaccines can lead to harmful immunological responses and a host of other infections. Moreover, weak immunological responses only decrease a person’s ability to fight the diseases that the vaccine was supposed to protect against in the first place.
11. Serious neurological disorders
Evidence now suggests that ingredients in flu vaccinations can actually cause serious neurological disorders. In 1976 a significant number of those who received the flu vaccine acquired Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a disorder characterized by permanent nerve damage and even paralysis. Flu vaccines can contain many harmful materials including detergent, mercury, formaldehyde, and strains of live flu virus.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
The pro-Pharma mainstream media would like everyone to believe that doctors and “scientists” all agree that vaccines are safe and effective, and that dissenters are uneducated or uninformed parents.
Not true. Doctors and scientists who dare to speak out against the status quo, putting their own careers in jeopardy for telling the other side of the story, are of course few, and clearly in the minority. But that does not mean they do not exist. It just means they are fewer in number, because they value truth and the health and well-being of the public more than financial connections to the pharmaceutical industry.
Leslie Manookian, producer of “The Greater Good” movie, lists over 150 scientists and physicians who have questioned vaccines publicly. Read the list here.
Below, we bring you short videos from three different doctors who all do an excellent job of summarizing the “other side” of the story when it comes to vaccines. You will not hear this anywhere in the mainstream media.
1. Dr. Suzanne Humphries
Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a practicing nephrologist (kidney physician), says the vaccine industry isn’t giving people both sides of the story, and parents need to get informed before subjecting their children to vaccines that can potentially cause serious harm or even death. She points out the reasoning of the government and pharmaceutical industry in claiming that “people are too stupid” to notice that vaccines are “miraculous,” and so they are going to give out vaccines anyway.
“Why must such a ‘wonderful product’ be forced on people?”
“Inventors of vaccines have chosen a belief system whereby infants are all born with inadequate immune systems (and therefore need to be “saved” from diseases by vaccines).”
Dr. Humphries states that most doctors think Mother Nature is flawed. The doctor doesn’t know how to take care of an immune system, because the doctor was never taught in medical school how to take care of an immune system. What you end up with is a whole society, from start to finish, that does not know how an immune system works, does not know how to take care of it, does not know how to replenish the nutrients and minerals that are needed, does not know how to ingest a diet that will support it, and then when it fails, “It’s God’s fault. We need a vaccine.”
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a doctor of osteopathy and the director and founder of OsteoMed II, a clinic established in 1996 in Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny talks about the lack of safety studies conducted on vaccines, pointing out that studies are only conducted on healthy individuals which are not representative of a large part of society that vaccines are given to. People who are chronically sick and are taking many different kinds of medications are never studied.
Dr. Tenpenny also discusses whether or not vaccines are effective, pointing out the difference between “vaccine antibodies” and natural immunity. She helps people understand that when a claim is made saying “vaccines are effective”, it simply means it effectively created an “antibody” for a specific disease, but not that it has proven to prevent the person from contracting that disease. She discusses the growing number of cases in the U.S. where disease outbreaks are occurring among the vaccinated populations, who have been fully vaccinated for the disease from which they are suffering.
Dr. Meryl Nass is an M.D. in internal medicine. In this interview she exposes the revolving door that exists between pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines and the U.S. government. She covers the Gardasil controversy and says “Healthy girls don’t just die suddenly.” Dr. Nass is also an expert on the anthrax vaccine and Gulf War Syndrome.
issolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk
Free Shipping Available! Learn More
Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm eBook – Available for immediate download.
Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.
Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.
Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.
More deaths among otherwise healthy people are being reported all across the United States among children and adults who received this year’s flu vaccination. Here are a couple of the latest deaths being reported in local media stations: Popular downtown hot dog vendor dies of flu
A fourth child in Clark County has died as a result of the flu, according to officials.
According to the Clark County Coroner’s Office, 5-year-old Kiera Driscoll died from cardiac arrest due to influenza A.
Kiera’s father, Patrick, said his daughter developed a cough and fever Sunday. On Monday, she was taken to a clinic, and prescribed steroids and a nebulizer. She collapsed later that day, and his wife performed CPR on Kiera until paramedics arrived. Kiera later died.
Patrick Driscoll said that Kiera had been vaccinated against the flu. He said doctors confirmed that Kiera had contracted the same strain for which she had been vaccinated.
Is the Science Behind Flu Vaccines Exempt from Scrutiny?
Is not one death from the flu in a healthy individual after receiving the flu vaccination worthy of an investigation into the safety of flu vaccines, and the supposed science behind them? When multiple deaths occur, when health officials call it “rare” after healthy individuals die from the flu after receiving the flu shot, does that not qualify as an “epidemic?” More people have now died from the flu after the flu shot in the United States than from Ebola.
One doctor who has sounded the alarm on the supposed science behind the annual flu vaccine is Dr. Mark Geier:
In this video, Dr. Mark Geier explains the fraud behind the flu vaccine. Dr. Geier is NOT anti-vaccine. He is an MD and has a PhD in genetics. He spent 10 years working at the National Institute of Health, and was a professor at Johns Hopkins University as a geneticist. He is also the author of over 150 peer-reviewed publications.
He worked on vaccine safety and efficacy for more than 30 years. He was one of four scientists who worked to replace the DTP vaccine, a vaccine that caused every child to become sick with a high fever at the time of vaccination, with the DTaP vaccine, which is an attenuated vaccine and causes illness due to fever in only 3% of those vaccinated.
In the video above, he explains that the flu shot causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and that the flu shot is not very effective in preventing the flu. He also explains that the CDC does not follow the law for vaccines in requiring long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine like they do with other vaccines, as it is impossible to test a vaccine that changes every year. So the flu vaccine is basically an experimental vaccine that they want to give out to 300 million people every year. There are also no studies showing the safety of giving the flu vaccine to the same person every single year. However, Dr. Geier points out that the CDC is in the business of distributing flu vaccines, because they represent 300 million doses per year, whereas all the childhood vaccines together only number 20 million.
Dr. Geier goes on to explain that flu is “the wrong thing to vaccinate against” because you have to keep re-vaccinating against it every year, unlike childhood infectious diseases, such as smallpox, that are only vaccinated for once. Dr. Geier points out how ridiculous it is spend billions of dollars on a vaccine that might, at its best, save about 50 lives a year, when there are far more serious problems causing death that are more worthy of that kind of expenditure.
Do you know of other flu deaths this season among people who received the flu vaccine? If so, please share in the comments here, so we can develop a list of reported flu deaths among those vaccinated.
Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.
Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.
Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors. Read: Read Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm on your mobile device! on your mobile device! $3.99
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this eBook, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe. Read: Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced? on your mobile device! $0.99
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Nurses all across the United States are having their Constitutional rights trampled upon for refusing mandatory flu vaccinations. As we have previously reported, thousands of nurses across the United States are taking a stand against forced flu vaccinations, choosing to either lose their job as a result, or endure shame and ridicule for being forced to wear a mask while on duty during flu season.
Now, the Law Offices of James Elsman has issued a press release stating that they have a client who is a nurse that has lost her job due to refusing the flu vaccination, and she has filed a class action suit for one hundred million dollars against the hospital that fired her, as well as the state and federal governments.
It should be noted that the new Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) has mandated that healthcare facilities must have 90% of their employees vaccinated with the flu vaccine to receive full reimbursements of Medicare and Medicaid payments. Law Offices of James Elsman Announces Suit: Nurse Refuses Shots — Sues Hospital, Federal and State Governments for $100,000,000 Claiming Flu-Shots Have Many Dangers and Questionable Advantages - Reuters.com
DETROIT, Jan. 22, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — A nurse was fired from her Hospital job for refusing to take the flu-shot on religious and health grounds, and is “blowing the cover off many dangers of the flu vaccine,” says her lawyer, James Leonard Elsman of Birmingham, Michigan.
Karen Bashista of S. Lyon, Livingston County, Michigan was a nurse for St. Joe Hospital, and was fired for not taking the flu-shot; though she offered to wear a mask, be moved to another floor and function, etc. She said “Hospital doctors got waivers of such.”
Elsman said this is the first suit in the U.S.A., which joins a termination with a major challenge to the efficacy of the much-vaunted “flu-shot,” because he is suing not only the Hospital, but also the C.D.C. (“Centers for Disease Control”) of the U.S. Government, and the State Community Health Dept.
Nurse Bashista continued: “People are just waking up to the dangers of flu-shots and other vaccination shots that we don’t question, because ‘government’ recommends such. Well, if government is so smart, why can’t they even administer Obamacare? Government is grasping at straws and many physicians know this, more and more. Why don’t they always take the flu-shots?”
Elsman said the flu-vac is made many months “before” the yearly-strains are even known, so it is a guess in the dark. “A shot into your body is putting an attenuated flu virus into you — remember when Piers Morgan of CNN actually got the flu, ‘right after’ some CNN doctor gave him the flu-shot on live TV? A scandal is brewing. There is no proof of efficacy, i.e. that it works in all cases. Medicine should be ashamed. Mrs. Bashista is standing up for all Americans.”
$100 million is prayed for, because the suit is a Class Action on behalf of all Americans in all States, concluded Elsman. “We will no longer take modern-medicine’s or the Government’s kool-aid. People deserve ‘informed consent’!”
Contact: James Elsman, J.D. News Conference for all Media, 248-645-0750 with Mrs. Bashista firstname.lastname@example.org 2:00 p.m. 635 Elm St. Friday, January 24, 2014 Birmingham, MI 48009 at lawyer’s office SOURCE Law Offices of James Elsman
Why should pediatricians suspect that a fully vaccinated child with either no symptoms or few symptoms is infected with and transmitting pertussis, when the CDC and AAP have taught them to believe vaccine orthodoxy is the truth and nothing but the truth?
There was fuss in the media last month about a little study of 26 vaccinated Florida pre-schoolers, who got sick with B. pertussis whooping cough or had pertussis-like symptoms during a five-month period in 2013. All of the children, aged one to five years attending the Tallahassee preschool, had received three to four doses of pertussis vaccine (DtaP) according to the CDC recommended schedule. Nervous doctors and media pundits selling vaccine orthodoxy warned that vaccine critics would make a big deal out of it.
Let’s examine the evidence to see if it is logical to make a big deal out of kids in a preschool classroom infecting each other, plus infecting other kids in their homes with whooping cough, even though all of them had been vaccinated.
Pertussis Vaccine Only 45% Effective in Vaccinated Preschoolers
The study, conducted by CDC and Florida public health officials, was published in Emerging Infectious Diseases on January 15, 2016 and revealed that pertussis vaccine effectiveness among children attending the preschool was estimated to be 45%. The average number of days from last vaccination to onset of pertussis symptoms in the pre-schoolers was 22 months, with seven children having been vaccinated within the previous year.
During their investigation, public health officials found that “it was apparent that many physicians were hesitant to provide a diagnosis of pertussis and did not test for this disease, given the recent vaccination history of the patients and despite reporting of an ongoing laboratory confirmed pertussis outbreak.” They added that, “pertussis vaccination should not dissuade physicians from diagnosing, testing, or treating persons with compatible illness for pertussis.”
The fact that doctors are not bothering to check to see if vaccinated kids are infected with and transmitting pertussis should come as no surprise to public health officials and medical trade associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics. They have spent decades carefully teaching pediatricians and other vaccine providers to believe that vaccines are nearly 100% effective and safe, and that anyone who believes otherwise is an ignorant fool, a danger to the public health, and in need of re-education or punishment.
Pediatricians Failing to Diagnose Pertussis in Vaccinated Children
The Florida study’s authors pointed out the obvious: the failure of pediatricians and other vaccine providers to diagnose pertussis infection in a vaccinated child is not helpful. “The spectrum of illness for pertussis in vaccinated children can vary widely and is often mild, with few classic symptoms of pertussis. Hesitation by providers in reporting presumptive pertussis delays public health response to prevent continued transmission of pertussis in the community,” they said.
It is understandable why pediatricians do not want to admit to themselves, much less admit to parents, that a vaccine they insist children and pregnant women get to prevent pertussis actually does not do that most of the time. Why should pediatricians suspect that a fully vaccinated child with either no symptoms or few symptoms is infected with and transmitting pertussis, when the CDC and AAP have taught them to believe vaccine orthodoxy is the truth and nothing but the truth? The media dutifully reinforces vaccine myths by not questioning vaccine orthodoxy, either.
CDC and AAP officials have only themselves to blame for pediatricians sticking their heads in the sand when the message they have put out for 50 years and still put out is “Pertussis, or whooping cough, can be prevented with vaccines.” Clearly, for the recently vaccinated pre-school children in Florida up to date on their DTaP shots, the pertussis vaccine prevented whooping cough less than half the time!
If a car seat belt failed more than half the time, it would pulled off the market.
Tdap Fails to Protect California Adolescents After One Year
On the heels of the Florida toddler study, a Kaiser Permanente study published in Pediatrics concluded that Tdap vaccine effectiveness was only 69% among 1200 California adolescents given Tdap during pertussis outbreaks between 2010 and 2014 in that state.8 Vaccine effectiveness waned to less than 9% after four years. And, despite a Tdap adolescent coverage of more than 90% in northern California, they had the highest incidence of pertussis of any age group in 2014.
In a February 5, 2016 Kaiser Permanente press release, the study’s lead author basically called routine Tdap booster shots for all adolescents a failed disease control strategy. Dr. Nicola Klein said,
Because Tdap provides reasonable short-term protection, it may contain whooping cough more effectively if it is administered to adolescents in anticipation of a local outbreak rather than on a routine basis at age 11 or 12.
The California legislature should take note since they passed a law last year denying a school education to children who have not gotten a Tdap booster shot at age 11 or 12 years old.
Another Study: Siblings Major Source of Pertussis for Infants
It is interesting that the media attention being given to the small DTaP Florida pre-school study and the Tdap Kaiser Permanente adolescent study has overshadowed a much bigger story about pertussis vaccine failure that was revealed in a study published in October 2015 in Pediatrics.11 That study conducted by public health officials evaluated reported pertussis cases in the U.S. between 2006 and 2013 among children under age one and revealed “the emergence of siblings as the major reservoir of infection.” The researchers concluded that infants are more likely to get whooping cough from their brothers and sisters than from their mothers.
When a source of pertussis infection was known (in 44% of infant cases), it was 36% from siblings; 21% from mothers; 10% from fathers; 15% from grandparents, uncles and aunts; and 11% from other sources.
Study authors also concluded that:
Increasing Pertussis Incidence: “Despite high or increasing coverage with pertussis vaccines, the incidence of disease has been slowly increasing in a number of countries, with notable epidemic peaks in recent years;
Most Pertussis In Vaccinated Children: Most pertussis in the US is occurring among “recently vaccinated children and adolescents;”
Shift Began in 2008 with Tdap: “We observed the beginning of the shift from mothers to siblings in 2008, three years after the introduction of Tdap in the US for routine use among adolescents and adults;”
More Tdap Useless: “Additional doses of Tdap are unlikely to reduce the overall burden of pertussis;”
Cocooning Doesn’t Work: “Revaccination of adult cocoon members is unlikely to halt transmission of disease to infants if siblings are the predominant reservoirs of infection;”
Pertussis Transmission Without Symptoms: “Even in settings where all household contacts are up-to-date with pertussis vaccinations, asymptomatic transmission of pertussis may occur, further impeding the success of the cocooning strategy;”
Infection Sources Often Unknown: “A source of infection is identified less than half the time, suggesting either infection by someone outside the household or asymptomatic transmission of disease.”
Children and Adults Transmitting Pertussis With Few or No Symptoms
The inconvenient truth about pertussis vaccine is that a lot of children and adults transmitting pertussis don’t have classic symptoms and are not being lab tested and this was a major problem for study researchers trying to identify the source of pertussis infection in infants under age one. They said,
Potential sources who were asymptomatic or had mild illness without cough may have also been missed in our study as we relied solely on parent report without laboratory testing of household members or other infant contacts.
The other problem for study researchers was that they didn’t know if people with cough symptoms had pertussis or another type of respiratory bacterial or viral infection. They admitted, “…. additionally without laboratory confirmation, we were unable to determine if B. pertussis was the actual cause of cough illness in the identified SOIs (sources of infection).”
Pertussis Vaccine Acquired Herd Immunity Is A Myth
Vaccine orthodoxy dictates that if 90% or more of people in a community get vaccinated, the community will be protected from infectious disease. The federal government’s Healthy People 2020 Immunization Goals confirms that vaccine orthodoxy tenet.
However, the CDC now quietly admits on its website that “the bacteria that cause pertussis are always changing at the genetic level” and there is “waning immunity” from the vaccine and that ”an increase in reported pertussis cases began to rise in the U.S. in the 1980’s,13 when more than 94% of kindergarten children had received 4 to 5 whole cell pertussis-containing DPT shots. Today, 94% to 98% of kindergarteners have 4 to 5 acellular pertussis-containing DTaP shots, plus 88% of children aged 13 to 17 years have gotten an additional Tdap booster shot.
Clearly, six doses of pertussis vaccine given to children between two months and 16 years of age cannot prevent pertussis infection and asymptomatic transmission of infection by vaccinated persons. Pertussis vaccination does not prevent fully vaccinated children and adults from transmitting the infection to infants under two months of age, who are the ones most likely to die from complications of pertussis.
Pertussis vaccine acquired herd immunity is a myth.
Despite a three-decade 94% or greater pertussis vaccination rate among U.S. children with both whole cell DPT and acellular DTaP vaccines—a coverage rate that well exceeds the government’s Healthy People 2020 Immunization Goal of 90% coverage—B. pertussis whooping cough is circulating, often silently circulating, throughout our population without being diagnosed. And it has been doing that for a long, long time.
The Solution? Vaccinate Pregnant Women
So what is the solution that public health officials have come up with? It is irrational and completely unscientific but here it is: vaccinate all pregnant women. After confirming the ineffectiveness of pertussis vaccine to prevent infection and asymptomatic transmission among vaccinated children, the public health official authors of the October 2015 Pediatrics study nevertheless concluded that,
Strong support of vaccination during pregnancy is needed to maximize the protection of infants in the first critical months of life.
How sad that instead of simply informing the public that the pertussis vaccine is a failure, health officials desperately clinging to vaccine orthodoxy are pushing pertussis vaccine risks on vulnerable pregnant women and have been dong that since 2011, without proving safety or effectiveness first.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Nichole Rolfe, formerly Nichole Bruff, was a nursing student at Baker College in Michigan who dreamt of being a nurse practitioner of midwifery before the nursing department’s director dismissed her–shortly before she was to graduate–after Rolfe questioned instructors who were teaching students to lie to patient’s in order to coerce them into getting vaccinated.
Health Impact News Editor Comments
In April of 2015, we reported here at Health Impact News that nursing student Nichole Rolfe, formerly Nichole Bruff, was dismissed from her nursing program shortly before graduation after she allegedly refused to commit fraud by lying to patients in order to coerce vaccine compliance, as directed by her instructors.
Nichole fought back with a lawsuit against Baker College.
Baker College requested the case be dismissed, but Judge Joseph Farah denied the motion, and Nichole’s case will now be heard before a Genesee County jury. The case is set for trial in summer 2016. Nichole’s attorney, Philip L. Ellison, has issued the following Press Release.
PRESS RELEASE: JUDGE DENIES BAKER COLLEGE’S DISMISSAL REQUEST IN VACCINE CASE
Flint, MI – The Genesee County Circuit Court has denied the request of Baker College to dismiss or other highly restrict the lawsuit brought by a former nursing student who claims she was wrongly dismissed from the nursing program at Baker’s Owosso campus due to discussions involving vaccines.
Nursing Students Instructed to Lie to Patients in Order to Get them Vaccinated
Nichole Rolfe is suing Baker College after she was dismissed from the school’s nursing program because she questioned when Baker College instructed students to misrepresent and lie to patients in order to get them vaccinated.
The case stems from two separate classes held in 2013 by two different instructors who, within days of each other, instructed students who were in the midst of clinicals with real patients to threaten and panic patients into accepting immunizations. Threats included the withholding of state medical assistance payments, denial of access to newborns, and the giving of false information.
Michigan Law Protects Patients’ Right to Informed Consent
Under Michigan law, patients have the right to choose—and reject—any and all medical treatments offered by hospitals.
During depositions, the Baker College instructors deny these instructions were given. Others in the room at the time have testified, under oath, such directives were taught.
Rolfe, a student who has paid Baker College more than $40,000 in tuition and fees, merely asked both instructors, how can nurses do that?
In the days following, the nursing department’s director decided to dismiss Rolfe at an impromptu meeting right before a scheduled class.
Rolfe, in court documents, claims her dismissal was for simply questioning the illegal directions to the nursing students. Baker College argues her dismissal was for the “oppositional” and “aggressive” way Rolfe’s questions were asked.
“Nurses Need to Obey the Patient’s Directives, Not Threaten or Lie”
After pre-trial evidence exchanges, Baker College requested the Court to dismiss the case citing that Rolfe’s evidence, being audio-recordings of meetings with administrators while at Baker College, violated Baker College’s audio-recording policies. Baker College also sought to limit the amount of damages claimed by Rolfe.
In an oral decision from the bench, Judge Joseph Farah denied the motions concluding that none of the arguments warrant dismissal or the placing of limitations on the case. The decision now permits the case to go before a Genesee County jury.
“The Circuit Court’s decision permits jurors to actually hear what Baker College actually did and what their instructors are teaching future Michigan nurses, the very nurses who will be caring for patients in their weakest physical condition,” states Philip L. Ellison, attorney for Rolfe. “Nurses need to obey the patient’s directives, not threaten or lie.”
Also at the hearing, Baker College additionally sought to preclude the release of certain emails between the nursing department’s director and an instructor about the case, and to prevent the last deposition of a key witness, another former nursing student. The judge denied both of Baker’s requests.
The case is slated to head to trial in summer 2016.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
(NaturalNews) It has been more than five months since an Italian court in Milan awarded compensation to the family of a young boy who developed autism from a six-in-one hexavalent vaccine manufactured by corrupt British drug giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and the U.S. media is still nowhere to be found in reporting on this breakthrough ruling.
On September 24, 2014, Italy's version of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program agreed that GSK's "INFANRIX Hexa" vaccine for polio, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, pertussis and haemophilus influenza type B induced permanent autism and brain damage in the previously healthy child, whose name has been kept private for safety.
The vaccine, which contains multiple antigens, thimerosal (mercury), multiple forms of aluminum, formaldehyde, recombinant (genetically modified) viral components and various chemical preservatives,[PDF] demonstrably caused the young boy to regress into autism shortly after he received all three doses of the vaccine, prompting his family to petition the case before Italy's Ministry of Health.
When the Ministry rejected it, the family proceeded to file a lawsuit, which is no longer an option in the U.S. thanks to a Supreme Court ruling that exempts drug companies from legal liability when their products harm, permanently disfigure or kill people.
After listening to expert medical testimony, the Italian court remarkably concluded that the boy suffered permanent harm as a result of the vaccine, and particularly its neurotoxic mercury and aluminum components. Confidential GSK report reveals that INFANRIX Hexa causes brain damage, anal leakage, autism and more Also presented as evidence was a 1,271-page confidential GSK report revealing that the drug giant knew full well from human clinical trials that INFANRIX Hexa causes autism, but the company chose to release the vaccine anyway. At least five known cases of autism arising from the jab are listed in the report on page 626, in fact:
At the conclusion of this damning report, GSK admits that INFANRIX Hexa can cause a wide range of deadly illnesses but insists that its risk-benefit profile "continues to be favourable." Listed among INFANRIX Hexa's adverse events are:
• Anemia hemolytic autoimmune disease (premature destruction of red blood cells) • Thrombocytopenia (low blood platelet count) • Thrombocytopenia purpura (blood clots in small blood vessels) • Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (immune system destroys blood platelets) • Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (excessive bruising or bleeding from lack of platelets) • Hemolytic anemia (red blood cells destroyed and removed from bloodstream prematurely) • Cyanosis (skin discoloration caused by lack of oxygen at skin's surface) • Injection site nodules, abscesses and injection site abscesses • Kawasaki's disease (inflammation of arteries) • Encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) • Encephalopathy (abnormal brain function) • Hematochezia (passage of blood through the anus) • Allergic reactions (including anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions) • Death
Italian courts also found MMR vaccine causes autism The ruling by the court, which is now being challenged by the Ministry of Health, comes upon the heels of an earlier one from 2012. Judge Lucio Ardigo found that the popular measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, also known as MMR, caused another child's autism. A 15-month-old boy who previously had no health conditions suddenly developed severe bowel and eating problems after getting the MMR vaccine. He was later diagnosed with autism.
The court found that the boy had "been damaged by irreversible complications due to vaccination (with trivalent MMR)," read the official court documents, according to Age of Autism.
"There is a desperate need for more science on autism and the role that vaccines play, flimsy industry, medical and government retorts to the contrary notwithstanding," wrote Mary S. Holland for the health news and information site.
Last Edit: Mar 24, 2016 23:24:18 GMT -5 by Master Kim
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
Package insert for Fluzone flu vaccine marketed to seniors reveals 23 seniors died during drug trial
The annual marketing campaign pushing people to receive flu vaccinations is in full force. CVS Pharmacies is offering a 20% off shopping pass if you purchase a flu vaccine.
As you can see in the screen shot above, taken from the CVS website, senior citizens over the age of 65 are being targeted to get the “high-dose” flu vaccine.
The FAQ at the CVS website defines the “high-dose” flu vaccine: “Containing four times the amount of antigen (the part of the vaccine that causes the body to produce antibody) in regular flu shots, high-dose flu shots, along with the additional antigen produced, are intended to create a stronger immune response.”
The name of this flu vaccine that is marketed for seniors is called “Fluzone.” You can find it being marketed to seniors at all the major pharmacies in the United States.
Package inserts for flu vaccines show a multitude of side effects, including death, and yet they are marketed the same as over-the-counter drugs with no prescription needed. Why?
Because in the United States vaccines enjoy complete immunity from lawsuits in the market place. If you are injured or die from a vaccine, you or your family cannot sue the manufacturer of the vaccine. This law enacted by Congress, was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011.
Therefore, they are marketed with the same marketing techniques as any other high-profit product. With the baby boomer generation moving into their senior years, today’s seniors are seen as an especially lucrative market.
So financial incentives like discounts on other products, as CVS is doing, is quite common in order to boost vaccine sales.
Walgreens has a different program that especially boosts sales of vaccines:
While vaccine rates in the U.S. among children are close to 90%, rates in other parts of the world (where pharmaceutical companies do not have immunity from the law for adverse effects) are much lower. So, in partnership with Walgreens, a non-profit organization (Shot@Life) buys up the vaccines and sends them to these countries for free (who doesn’t want something for free, especially when you live in a poor country??)
This is a brilliant marketing plan for the pharmaceutical companies, as the U.S. government gives the organization buying the vaccines non-profit status, allowing them to receive tax deductible donations to pay for the vaccines. Walgreens is probably a contributor to the program as a tax write off.
With legal immunity to market dangerous products, don’t expect those doing the marketing and making the profits to warn you of the side effects. You need to find this information yourself, usually from the Internet.
For those pro-vaccine forces that warn people how dangerous it is to get information from the Internet, the information we are about to share is directly from the FDA website (at least at the time of this writing – they have been known to remove items from their website if it gets too much publicity and makes them look bad), and you can look it up yourself.
The high-dose Fluzone vaccine being marketed this flu season to seniors, which has four times the amount of antigens that the regular flu shot has, as well as the non-high dose version, had 23 seniors die during drug trials.
The package insert for the high-dose Fluzone flu vaccine is found here (for now).
In the section documenting adverse effects, this is what is written:
Within 6 months post-vaccination, 156 (6.1%) Fluzone High-Dose recipients and 93 (7.4%) Fluzone recipients experienced a serious adverse event. No deaths were reported within 28 days post-vaccination. A total of 23 deaths were reported during the period Day 29–180 post-vaccination: (0.6%) among Fluzone High-Dose recipients and 7 (0.6%) among Fluzone 1 recipients. The majority of these participants had a medical history of cardiac, hepatic, neoplastic, renal, and/or respiratory diseases. No deaths were considered to be caused by vaccination.
This statement stating that 23 seniors died, which really should be headline news but is buried in a package insert on the FDA website, begs several questions:
1. By what basis can they conclude that “No deaths were considered to be caused by vaccination”??
2. If, as it is implied, the majority of these 23 deaths were caused by pre-existing conditions, why were there no deaths in the first 28 days? Shouldn’t the deaths, if not attributable to the vaccine but pre-existing conditions, be equally spread out through all time periods?
3. How does the medical history for these 23 seniors compare to the medical history of those who did not die? Were there any significant differences? The range of symptoms given in the package insert can very well cover almost all seniors during the flu season. And what about those who died that were not among the “majority” who had these pre-existing conditions? A majority could simply be 12 out of the 23.
Besides death, which is just one “serious adverse event,” there were 226 other “serious” adverse events, for a total of 249 serious adverse events, out of only 3,833 participants.
If this does not constitute a dangerous drug that should probably not even be on the market, then I don’t know what does. And yet, it is sold to unsuspecting seniors and others like candy at these drug stores.
The CDC would like you to believe that the risk of GBS from the flu shot is only one out of one million. But if that is the case, why is there a warning on package inserts of flu vaccines, and why is it the first question EMTs ask when dealing with GBS emergencies?
The package insert for Fluzone states: “If Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has occurred within 6 weeks of previous influenza vaccination, the decision to give Fluzone High-Dose should be based on careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks.”
I wonder how many vaccine sales people at these pharmacies give “careful consideration” to this adverse side effect, or any others, before injecting you?
Be informed this flu season! Educate yourself before vaccinating!
The symptoms of Guillain-Barré Syndrome are similar to Polio
First, let’s start with the indisputable facts: the seasonal flu vaccine causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Just read the package insert of any commercially available flu vaccine. The manufacturers and government health officials concede this fact. If you go to an emergency room with sudden onset of GBS symptoms, the first question the doctors will ask you is: “Did you recently get the flu shot?”
The only thing that is disputed is: how many people does it affect?
The government’s official response is that the flu vaccination causes two cases of GBS per one million doses. From what I can tell, the rationale for those numbers mainly comes from here, and here. Most flu vaccine manufacturers’ packet inserts, however, are still listing the old numbers at one out of one million.
But are these rates accurate?
I think there is ample evidence to provide reasonable doubt that these rates are accurate, and that they are actually much higher.
The first place to look is in settlements for GBS caused by the flu vaccine in the Vaccine Court. U.S. law prevents you from suing vaccine manufacturers for any damage or deaths due to vaccines. By an Act of Congress in 1986 that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011, a special court was set up to handle all vaccine cases. The funds for settlements are paid via a tax on the sales of vaccines.
Just a quick cursory view of cases that are being compensated by this vaccine court shows that the most cases, by far, are cases for GBS and the flu vaccine.
The U.S Court of Federal Claims provides a referral list of attorneys that specialize in representing clients wanting to file claims for vaccine damages. The list is here, and contains 123 attorneys.
One of the law firms representing clients in the Vaccine Court is Maglio, Christopher, & Toale. This law firm has actually listed cases they have settled in the past couple of years here.
From what appears to be some point in 2010 through 2013, they have settled 132 cases:
CLIENT COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE INJURIES Vaccine Name
Illness or Symptoms
Link to Court Decision
MMR, Hepatitis B Myopathy, Polyneuropathy, Quadraparesis Case No.11-0143V $550,000 Hepatitis B Vaccine Multiple Sclerosis Case No. 11-731V $575,000 Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis Vaccine (DTaP) Cerebral Palsy, Encephalopathy, Seizure Disorder,Cognitive Delays Case No. 08-463V $61 Million Influenza Vaccine Transverse Myelitis Case No. 09-144V $600,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 12-533V $850,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-0662V $60,000 Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccine Neurologic Injury Case No. 08-348V $200,000 HPV, Menactra Vaccines Multiple Sclerosis Case No. Redacted $3.5 Million Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-550V $160,000 Influenza Vaccine Myelopathy, Frozen Shoulder Syndrome Case No. 10-802V $82,500 Influenza Vaccine Transverse Myelitis Case No. 12-308V $370,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-719V $55,000 Influenza Vaccine Neuralgic Amyotrophy, Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Case No. 12-387V $80,000 Hepatitis B, Trivalent Influenza Neuralgias Case No. 09-744V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-792V $350,000 TDaP, Influenza Vaccines Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) Case No. 11-604V $125,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-768V $100,000 Tetanus (Tdap), Gardasil, Menactra Vaccines Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Case No. 11-21V $70,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-373V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Transverse Myelitis Case No. 11-242V $250,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-143V $100,000 Flu Vaccine Death, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-620V $125,000 Trivalent Influenza Guillain-Barre Syndrome Case No.10-549V $150,000 Influenza Vaccine Death; Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-767V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Bell’s Palsy, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-619V $230,000 Flu Vaccine Miller Fisher Variant of GBS Case No. 11-119V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Death, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-364V $350,000 Flu Vaccine Death, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-123V $235,000 Influenza Vaccine Ventricular Fibrillation, Cardiac Arrest Case No. 09-816V $225,000 MMR, Hep B Vaccines Myopathy, Polyneuropathy, Quadraparesis Case No. 10-129V $550,000 Influenza Vaccine Encephalitis Case No. 10-132V $205,000 Influenza Vaccine Brachial Neuritis Case No. 09-50 V $530,000 Influenza Vaccine Death Case No. 09-707 $250,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 08-833V $425,000 Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis Vaccine (DTaP) Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-834 V $175,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No.09-0382V $150,000 Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-216V $175,000 Influenza Vaccine Brachial Plexus Injury Case No. 09-248 V $75,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-24V $205,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-697V $90,000 Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-705V $82,892 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-545V $85,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-451V $210,000 Influenza (Flu) Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-331V $300,000 HPV Vaccine, Hepatitis A Vaccine, Menactra/Meningococcal Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-277V $55,000 Hib Vaccine Menningitis Case No. 08-672V $10,961 HPV Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 08-429V $50,000 Influenza Vaccine Chonic Inflamatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 07-290V $895,012 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 12-417V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 12-112V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-865V $75,000 Tetanus (Tdap) Chonic Inflamatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-864V $150,000 Tdap Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-793V $450,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-730V $40,000 Tetanus (Tdap), Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-648V $130,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-635V $310,000 Influenza (Flu) Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-630V $50,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-493V $175,000 Flu Vaccine Encephalitis Case No. 11-484V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine, Tetanus (Tdap) Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-387V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-369V $50,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-367V $85,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-307V $85,000 Tetanus (Tdap), Hepatitis B Vaccine, Varicella Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-305V $50,000 Influenza Vaccine Neuropathy, Myelopathy Case No. 11-28V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-243V $125,000 Hepatitis B Vaccine Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Case No. 11-220V $78,419 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-121V $60,000 Flu Vaccine Chonic Inflamatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Case No. 11-120V $35,000 Tetanus (Tdap) Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-105V $90,000 Dtap, Polio, Varicella, Hepatitis A Vaccines Ideopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Case No. 10-818V $87,500 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-79V $315,000 Influenza Vaccine Ideopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Case No. 10-795V $75,000 Tetanus, Diptheria Vaccines Brachial Neuritis Case No. 10-783V $180,000 Influenza Vaccine Acute Inflammatory Polyradiculopathy, GBS Case No. 10-687V $166,959 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-601V $130,000 Flu Vaccine Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Case No. 10-562V $150,000 Influenza Vaccine Encephalitis Case No. 10-550V $202,000 Tetanus Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-527V $110,000 Tdap, Menactra Vaccines Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Case No. 10-516V $40,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-514V $95,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-499V $35,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-497V $85,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-440V $285,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-438V $109,962 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-419V $185,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-407V $300,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-406V $120,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-376V $400,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-344V $300,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-333V $300,000 Flu Vaccine Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, Guillain Barre Syndrome Case No. 10-31V $125,000 Influenza Vaccine Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Case No. 10-314V $160,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-305V $140,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-292V $162,500 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-267V $85,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-19V $100,000 Gardasil, Hepatitis A Vaccines Chronic Headache, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-161V $25,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-159V $100,000 Gardasil Sequential Peripheral Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Case No. 10-116V $30,000 Influenza Vaccine Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), GBS Case No. 09-859V $150,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-858V $175,000 Rotavirus Vaccine Recurrent Intussusception Case No. 09-855V $10,000 Influenza Vaccine Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, Guillain Barre Syndrome CaseNo. 09-853V $140,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) CaseNo. 09-831V $125,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-773V $140,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-173V $100,000 Diphtheria, Tetanus Pertussis Vaccine (DTaP),Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR),Hepatitis A Vaccines Acute Allergic reaction,Gastrointestinal and Behavioral Symptoms Case No. 08-158V $75,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) CaseNo. 09-0696V $100,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-266V $100,000 Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-423V $100,000 Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-873V $125,000 Influenza Vaccine Burning Pain; Left Brachialplexitis Case No. 10-209V $50,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-782V $51,701 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) CaseNo. 09-321V $70,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-80V $50,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-417V $104,481 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-520V $80,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-790V $275,000 Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-281V $300,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome/ (GBS) Case No. 09-550V $160,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS), Transverse Myelitis, Death Case No. 09-552V $200,000 Menactra, DTaP, Varivax Vaccines Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 09-867 $100,000 Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-265V $125,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 10-524V $165,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome Case No. 11-027V $145,000 Influenza Vaccine Demyelinating Polyneuritis Case No. 11-061V $105,000 Influenza Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome Case No. 11-198V $38,564 Flu Shot Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-306V $220,000 Influenza Shot Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 11-368V $345,000 Influenza Vaccine Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Case No. 12-149V $80,000 Flu Vaccine Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) Case No. 12-416V $110,000
Out of those 132 cases, 93 were for GBS, and most of those for the flu vaccine, as you can see above. There were 34 settlements in 2011, 35 in 2012, and 15 so far listed in 2013 for GBS. And this is just one law firm!
The law firm has 9 attorneys, but I don’t know if all of them represent vaccine injuries and deaths. This is out of 123 attorneys listed on the U.S Court of Federal Claims website, which is not an exhaustive list. We could not find other law firms providing the kinds of stats that Maglio, Christopher, & Toale did on their website.
Another place to find clues regarding the rate of GBS from the flu vaccine is with the Department of Justice’s reports from the attorneys that litigate on behalf of the U.S. government and pharmaceutical companies’ interests to avoid paying out settlements. Some of these cases are recorded and found online. The most common one found is Vincent J. Matanoski, J.D., from the DOJ Torts branch. You can find the most recent report from Sept. 5, 2013, and covering the period of 5/16/2013 to 8/15/2013 here.
There were 77 cases settled during these 3 months, according to this report, as you can see above. Fifty of those cases were for the flu shot, and 31 for GBS. It is not clear if this represents the total number of cases the DOJ settled, or just for this particular attorney. The Justice Department has about 45 attorneys in their Civil Torts division.
Note that these statistics, which clearly show that the vast majority of cases settled in the Vaccine Court are for GBS related to the flu vaccine, are only a portion of those filing cases in the vaccine court. Besides these and others who file claims in the Vaccine Court, how many more are there that never file, either because they simply did not know this special court existed, or were not in a position to fight a lengthy legal battle with the government?
Attorney Howard Gold of Gold Law Firm, who settled a case for GBS due to a flu vaccine in 2011 remarked:
Petitioners have three (3) years from the onset of the injury (or two years from date of death) to file a claim. Gold states that the “Program is not used as much as it could be because the American public is just not aware of it. I receive at least 5 calls a month from individuals who cannot obtain compensation because the deadline has passed. They just found out about it too late. We all need to do a better job in getting the word out to the public that the Program exists.” (Source.)
The other point to consider is that GBS symptoms can range anywhere from a few days to a month after receiving a vaccination, so many people who are suffering from GBS may not even associate their GBS to the flu shot.
The CDC stated before the 2012 flu season that manufacturers had in stock “as many as” 145 million doses of the flu vaccine ready to be sold. It is unlikely that all were sold, but even if they were, given the “official” stats of the government, there should only have been 290 cases of GBS in 2012. Or if you believe what the vaccine manufacturer’s inserts are claiming about GBS rates at one out of one million, then there should only have been 145 cases of GBS due to the flu vaccine last year.
According to the CDC, the total number of GBS cases reported in the U.S. is “about 80 to 160 cases of GBS each week,” or 4,160 to 8,320 cases per year. Of course they make the assumption that most of these are not vaccine related. The official medical view is that the cause of most cases of GBS is “unknown.”
What is Guillain-Barré Syndrome? Here is the definition the CDC gives:
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disorder in which a person’s own immune system damages their nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis. GBS can cause symptoms that last for a few weeks. Most people recover fully from GBS, but some people have permanent nerve damage. In very rare cases, people have died of GBS, usually from difficulty breathing.
The CDC definition for Polio:
Polio is an infectious disease caused by a virus that lives in the throat and intestinal tract. Up to about 72% of susceptible persons infected with polio have no symptoms. However, infected persons without symptoms can still spread the virus and cause others to develop polio. About 24% of infected susceptible persons have minor symptoms such as fever, sore throat, upset stomach, or flu-like symptoms and have no paralysis or other serious symptoms. About 1-5% develop aseptic meningitis with stiffness of the back, back, or legs, and in some persons increased or abnormal sensations a few days after the minor illness resolves. These symptoms typically last from two to ten days, followed by complete recovery. Less than 1% of polio cases result in paralysis of the limbs (usually the legs). Of those cases resulting in paralysis, 5-10% of the patients die when the respiratory muscles are paralyzed.
Of course, the pro-vaccine crowd wants everyone to believe that polio was eradicated by vaccines a long time ago. Read Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ excellent article: Did Vaccines Really Eradicate Polio?, as well as Dr . Viera Scheibner’s article: The REAL History Behind the Polio Vaccine.
Polio, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and any other names of disease are simply arbitrary names assigned to groups of symptoms and conditions. The symptoms of polio and GBS are so similar, some people feel that Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s condition was really GBS, and not polio (See: Did FDR Have Guillain-Barré?) There were no flu shots in 1921 when FDR contracted polio, but the tuberculosis vaccine was introduced that year.
It is very obvious from the evidence of cases settled for damages, including death, due to the influenza vaccine, that there is great risk in the seasonal flu shot. And yet these shots are dispensed at pharmacies with no prescription from a physician as if they are completely safe. Sadly, this is probably a result of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program enacted by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court that gives complete legal immunity to those who produce and sell vaccines in the United States.
Read the full package insert for any of this year’s flu vaccines at the National Vaccine Information Center. You need to educate yourself on the dangers of the flu vaccine, because it is obvious the government and medical system will not.
This is the heartbreaking story of a former professor of nursing at a Connecticut university. She and her daughter, Katie, talk about what happened to their lives after a Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) complication of a routine flu shot led to strokes and ended in complete paralysis for this once active, vibrant mother and grandmother.
KOSA Acupuncture 4 Professional Dr. Suite 115 Gaithersburg, MD, 20879, USA
a suspending fluid (sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein) preservatives and stabilizers (for example, albumin, phenols, and glycine) adjuvants or enhancers that help improve the vaccine’s effectiveness very small amounts of the culture material used to grow the virus or bacteria used in the vaccine, such as chicken egg protein. (1)
Here is information to understand the process of how vaccines are made.
Vaccines That Contain Potential Allergens Potential Allergens as Vaccine Ingredients: Amphotericin B Casein (Bovine) Chlortetracyclin Ovalbumin (Egg) Gelatin (Bovine) Gelatin (Porcine) Gentamicin Sulfate Latex Neomycin Ovalbumin Polymyxin B Serum Fetal Bovine Sodium taurodeoxycholate Streptomycin Thimerosal Yeast
Ingredients in Each Vaccine Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary – Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine (updated 2/15) Vaccine Excipients per 0.5mL (updated 3/26/13) Vaccine Ingredient Summary – CDC (2010, has info regarding all human cell lines, monkey kidney cells, etc)
INGREDIENTS, EXCIPIENTS, ADDITIVES, ADJUVENTS
Human Cell Lines: Vaccines from Aborted Fetal Cell Lines (and ethical alternatives) CDC Version – Vaccines containing aborted fetal tissue A Brief History of Human Diploid Cell Strains Children of God for Life – for more information on using aborted fetal tissue 1. HeLa Cells (polio vaccine) 2. MRC-5 Cells 3. PER.C6 (Crucell) 4. WI-38 (adenovirus, MMR, MMRV, Varicella, Zoster Vaccines)